Author Archives: Hall

E.D.N.Y.: iCloud SW was particular to time and offenses

“The Court finds both the iCloud and Midwood Lumber Warrants were sufficiently particularized and tethered to the Affidavits’ probable cause showings, thereby meeting the Fourth Amendment’s requirements.” … “[I]he iCloud Warrant identifies the property to be searched as “information associated … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Forfeiture, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: iCloud SW was particular to time and offenses

D.Nev.: Affidavit accompanying cell phone SW provided particularity

If the affidavit accompanies the warrant it can cure particularity problems. Here it did. United States v. King, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103299 (D. Nev. June 11, 2024).* Plaintiff stated a claim for arrest without probable cause by the defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Affidavit accompanying cell phone SW provided particularity

OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

A violation of the state prosecuting attorney’s subpoena power in felony cases was not subject to the exclusionary rule. In addition, obtaining third party information from an IP address is not a search. State v. Diaw, 2024-Ohio-2237, 2024 Ohio App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Independent source, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

DE: Consent to search cell phone after false statement officers had SW was invalid

Defendant’s alleged consent to search his cell phone came after officers told him they had a warrant, which they didn’t, until the next day. Defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search. Matthews v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 202 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Consent to search cell phone after false statement officers had SW was invalid

W.D.Ky.: State law alleged defects in warrant process not applicable in federal court without showing why suppression is an appropriate remedy

A state search warrant was used to prosecute in federal court. Defendant raised numerous state law defects to the warrant that did not constitute Fourth Amendment violations. “Even if these warrants were procedurally deficient under state law, Gray has supplied … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: State law alleged defects in warrant process not applicable in federal court without showing why suppression is an appropriate remedy

CA5: Psychological injuries can support a 4A claim; unintended shooting victim has claim

If the facts were resolved against the police here, they violated clearly-established Fourth Amendment law by unjustifiably shooting into an occupied house and hitting an intended victim. Also, psychological injuries may sustain a Fourth Amendment claim. No qualified immunity. Singleton … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Psychological injuries can support a 4A claim; unintended shooting victim has claim

CA7: Manual border search of cell phone revealing CP was reasonable

Manual border search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable and revealed child pornography, and that justification for a more intensive search. United States v. Mendez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14058 (7th Cir. June 10, 2024). Defendant rented his hotel room, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Manual border search of cell phone revealing CP was reasonable

MN: Warrantless DNA swabbing of apt door violated curtilage

The warrantless DNA swabbing of defendant’s apartment door was within the curtilage because it required physical contact, which is different than a dog sniff. “Although members of the public and law-enforcement officers generally have an implied license to approach a … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, DNA, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on MN: Warrantless DNA swabbing of apt door violated curtilage

CA10: Kansas Pet Animal Act did not satisfy the closely regulated industries exception

The Kansas Pet Animal Act did not satisfy the closely-regulated-industries standards of Burger and Patel. Johnson v. Smith, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14019 (10th Cir. June 10, 2024):

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA10: Kansas Pet Animal Act did not satisfy the closely regulated industries exception

D.Mont.: A helpful summary of how to look at a potential Franks challenge

United States v. Howard, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101989 (D. Mont. June 7, 2024):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mont.: A helpful summary of how to look at a potential Franks challenge

wired: The Age of the Drone Police Is Here

wired: The Age of the Drone Police Is Here (“In Chula Vista, drone flight paths trace a map of the city’s inequality, with poorer residents experiencing far more exposure to the drones’ cameras and rotors than their wealthier counterparts, a … Continue reading →

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on wired: The Age of the Drone Police Is Here

CA3: Failure to provide a complete list of all that was seized under a warrant wasn’t justification for suppression

Failure to provide a complete list of all that was seized under a warrant wasn’t justification for suppression. United States v. Jackson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13913 (3d Cir. June 7, 2024). The dashcam video supported the claim defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA3: Failure to provide a complete list of all that was seized under a warrant wasn’t justification for suppression

D.Minn.: Calling in wrong LPN made stop unreasonable

Defendant’s stop based on a mistaken belief the vehicle was stolen was not objectively reasonable when it was based on calling in the wrong number. United States v. Fields, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99668 (D. Minn. June 5, 2024), rejecting … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Calling in wrong LPN made stop unreasonable

CA9: Fact question shooting ptf’s decedent without warning who wasn’t posing threat was potentially unreasonable

The district court’s grant of qualified immunity is reversed. There are factual disputes for trial that the shooting death of plaintiff’s decedent was unreasonable because he presented no threat and was shot without warning. Calonge v. City of San Jose, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Fact question shooting ptf’s decedent without warning who wasn’t posing threat was potentially unreasonable

CA10: No REP in fire scene premises totally destroyed

Taking of photographs of a fire scene of a mobile home that burned to the ground was not a Fourth Amendment violation. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the remains. United States v. Hernandez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA10: No REP in fire scene premises totally destroyed

E.D.N.Y.: There was RS for def’s border cell phone search for drug importation

While the law isn’t completely clear on the justification for a cell phone search at the border, the justification for either standard is satisfied. There was clearly reasonable suspicion of drug importing at JFK for search of his cell phone. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: There was RS for def’s border cell phone search for drug importation

D.Minn.: Parole cell phone search under MN law was reasonable under 4A

Defendant’s parole cell phone search under Minnesota law was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Guevara, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100403 (D. Minn. June 6, 2024). Driving one’s car to controlled buys gives probable cause for the vehicle. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Parole cell phone search under MN law was reasonable under 4A

D.V.I.: 19 warning shots from USCG helicopter to effect stop of boat wasn’t unreasonable

The Coast Guard did not use unreasonable excessive force in firing 19 warning shots from a helicopter to get defendants to stop their boat. United States v. Menocal-Mero, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99881 (D.V.I. June 5, 2024). Viewing the bodycam, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Custody, Excessive force, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.V.I.: 19 warning shots from USCG helicopter to effect stop of boat wasn’t unreasonable

N.D.Tex.: Prison shakedown search that included strip searches was reasonable

Prison shakedown search that included strip searches was reasonable. “The foregoing sufficiently demonstrates the fittingness of these strip searches under the Fourth Amendment. These routine strip searches, which occur only twice per year, require the upheaval of all prisoners and … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Prison shakedown search that included strip searches was reasonable

CA11: Shooting ptf’s dog gets no QI here

Alleged unnecessary shooting of plaintiff’s dog stated claim with no qualified immunity. Plowright v. Miami Dade Cty., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13613 (11th Cir. June 5, 2024):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting ptf’s dog gets no QI here