Daily Archives: February 24, 2026

D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

Defendant was driving a borrowed car without a valid DL. He still has standing, and that’s not conditioned on a driver’s license. United States v. Huggins, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34758 (D.N.J. Feb. 20, 2026). Defendant’s vehicle was parked unlocked … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

“Considering the totality of the circumstances, there are insufficient facts before the court to establish reasonable suspicion that would allow Officer Embley to prolong the stop and inquire about Kummer’s drug history. Reasonable suspicion is a low standard, but it … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what is shared with a cloud AI program, even if it’s in anticipation of litigation. Therefore, no attorney-client privilege in what the client shares with AI trying to help his attorney. United … Continue reading

Posted in AI, Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

Plaintiff didn’t sufficiently plead a Fourth Amendment violation and overcoming qualified immunity from the officer’s seizing his notebook and perusing it and handing it to another officer. It’s his burden to deal with qualified immunity, and he didn’t adequately respond. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

An arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest. Hernandez v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. LEXIS 7 (Feb. 19, 2026). There was no rationale entitlement to discovery of the name of the informant in this case, so defense counsel wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

Plaintiff sued while his criminal trespass case was pending in state municipal court. The action is stayed because plaintiff can raise his constitutional claims there. Younger also counsels that. Spiehs v. Allen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35038 (D. Kan. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop

“The district court correctly held that the officers did not violate Torres’s Fourth Amendment rights by asking him whether he was armed. The officer’s question to Torres, which took no more than three seconds to ask and answer, did not … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop

E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

Plaintiff finances cars. When Suffolk County seized the cars from the buyers, they were allegedly really slow in returning them to Santander. Plaintiff admits the initial seizure was lawful, so the retention doesn’t ipso facto violate the Fourth Amendment. Santander … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

This blog is 23 today

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on This blog is 23 today