Daily Archives: February 25, 2026

CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

An administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established at the time this one happened. Qualified immunity denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5197 (6th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Not the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Pretext | Comments Off on CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files by Maddie Varner (“The US Justice Department disclosures give fresh clues about how tech companies handle government inquiries about your data.”)

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

Defendant’s frisk on entering a VA hospital could be justified as an area entry search, but the facts known to the officers, that defendant was already considered a safety risk, justified it by reasonable suspicion under Terry. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition

When a person on parole owns property and lets others use or rent it, the others aren’t subject to the parolee’s search waiver. United States v. Perez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5305 (4th Cir. Feb. 23, 2026):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition