Daily Archives: February 7, 2026

CA11: Jury gets to decide here that stop lacked RS

There’s a dispute for the jury whether there was reasonable suspicion for plaintiff’s continued detention. The stop was based on an anonymous tip, and plaintiff didn’t match it, which the officers had to know. Jarvis v. City of Daytona Beach, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Jury gets to decide here that stop lacked RS

CA6: Stone requires that a habeas petitioner had a method to make 4A claims, not that they would succeed

Petitioner had his opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and did, and the outcome doesn’t matter. The fact that he could do so does. CoA denied. Bugno v. Walters, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA6: Stone requires that a habeas petitioner had a method to make 4A claims, not that they would succeed

NY Co.: State showed PC for DNA test for firearm possession

Here, the state showed probable cause and reasonableness to seek DNA from defendant to compare it to alleged touch DNA found on the firearm he’s alleged to have possessed in threatening two ADAs. People v. Hightower, 2026 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY Co.: State showed PC for DNA test for firearm possession

M.D.Fla.: Postal workers have no REP in their work trucks

Postal workers have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their work trucks. It’s owned by the USPS and others always have access and they well know they are subject to surveillance on the job. United States v. Ayala, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Postal workers have no REP in their work trucks

CA5 explaining clearly established law, again; fair notice to police

CA5 explaining clearly established law, again. Elizondo v. Hinote, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3713 (5th Cir. Feb. 5, 2026)*:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5 explaining clearly established law, again; fair notice to police

CA6: Flock violated no duty to ptf when he was stopped based on police mistake, if there was one

Plaintiff sued Flock because he was stopped but then released because his LPN was put on a “hot list” by police, apparently mistakenly. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his LPN, and his stop was by the police, … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Flock violated no duty to ptf when he was stopped based on police mistake, if there was one

D.Mass.: Use of confidential taxpayer information to conduct immigration arrests and entries is enjoined

The use of confidential taxpayer information by ICE for immigration raids without any statutorily required procedures is enjoined. There is also the problem of no judicial warrant from judicial officer, just an immigration judge if at all. Cmty. Econ. Dev. … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Use of confidential taxpayer information to conduct immigration arrests and entries is enjoined

D.Md.: Premature filing of FTCA case over a search denies jurisdiction

Because plaintiff filed his FTCA case before the six-month window was up, the court lacks jurisdiction over it. There is also a Bivens claim for execution of a search warrant which the court finds different than Bivens. Wood v. United … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Federal Tort Claims Act, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Premature filing of FTCA case over a search denies jurisdiction

CA6: No standing in a group chat SW of another person’s account

Defendant had no standing to challenge a group chat obtained by search warrant from a social media provider of another person’s account. (Defendants discussed a kidnapping over group chat.) United States v. Blake, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: No standing in a group chat SW of another person’s account

MI: Def not in custody during execution of DNA warrant where she chose to talk

In a 25-year-old cold case of a buried infant, officers got a warrant for defendant’s DNA. She argued she was in custody for purposes of her statement given at the time, but she wasn’t. The officers were clear on that. … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, DNA, Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MI: Def not in custody during execution of DNA warrant where she chose to talk