Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA6: Handcuffing for open carry in Ohio stated a claim; no qualified immunity

The Ohio legislature decided that open carry is permissible with a CCW. Plaintiff was stopped and handcuffed for thirty minutes and let go. He states a claim and qualified immunity is no defense. “Where it is lawful to possess a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Handcuffing for open carry in Ohio stated a claim; no qualified immunity

CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

Michigan Hutaree militia members were indicted, tried, and acquitted. Their Bivens action for malicious prosecution fails. The indictment was not based on provably false testimony, and there was thus probable cause for the case to go forward. “The indictment in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

boingboing: Court says DEA is allowed to secretly fill your truck with weed, get into firefights with Zetas

boingboing: Court says DEA is allowed to secretly fill your truck with weed, get into firefights with Zetas by Cory Doctorow: Craig Patty asked his employee Lawrence Chapa to help take one of his two trucks to the garage, not … Continue reading

Posted in Police misconduct, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on boingboing: Court says DEA is allowed to secretly fill your truck with weed, get into firefights with Zetas

CA5 en banc: Border Patrol agent’s shooting of unarmed teenager across border gets qualified immunity

On en banc review, the panel decision is reinstated. The U.S. government has sovereign immunity for the shooting death of an armed Mexican teenager standing in Mexico shot from the U.S. at Ciudad Juarez, across the border from El Paso. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5 en banc: Border Patrol agent’s shooting of unarmed teenager across border gets qualified immunity

CA3: Officers confronted with an unknown call of a screaming woman were not unreasonable in waiting to sort it out, even though it resulted in a delay of getting a woman to the hospital where she died

In a “tragic” case of a young woman dying from lock of oxygen to the brain from an asthma attack, police responded to a 911 call of a “woman screaming” and didn’t know what they had. When they arrived, the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Officers confronted with an unknown call of a screaming woman were not unreasonable in waiting to sort it out, even though it resulted in a delay of getting a woman to the hospital where she died

CA11: The beating of ptf to “subdue” him after flight from officer was reasonable

Defendant fled from an officer reaching into his truck to stop him from leaving. Ultimately he wrecked his truck. Despite his desire to surrender, “he noticed a small retention pond and — for reasons he asserts are unknown even to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: The beating of ptf to “subdue” him after flight from officer was reasonable

CA4: Without emotional distress claim, knock-and-announce violation worth only nominal damages

A knock-and-announce violation is clearly established law, so no qualified immunity. But here, without an emotional distress claim, it’s only worth nominal damages, so the damages should be remitted. Here, there was a death of another, but plaintiff waived any … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Without emotional distress claim, knock-and-announce violation worth only nominal damages

OH2: Anonymous tip of shooting was corroborated enough by witnesses at scene

The anonymous tip defendant was involved in a shooting was corroborated by people at the scene who pointed to defendant’s house and blood drops outside, and it led to a fair inference that the shooter or a victim was inside. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OH2: Anonymous tip of shooting was corroborated enough by witnesses at scene

CA6: Prolonged Tasering known to be excessive force that causes brain injury

Tasering plaintiff’s ward twice for 5 and 21 seconds violated clearly established law and created an unnecessary risk of the brain injury he suffered. It was clear to the officer that applying a Taser for 15 seconds or more was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Prolonged Tasering known to be excessive force that causes brain injury

CA10: An arrest during a larceny sting where a backpack was left near an ATM was not in violation of clearly established law; qualified immunity applies

An arrest during a larceny sting where a backpack was left near an Albuquerque ATM was not in violation of clearly established law, so qualified immunity applies. Quinn v. Young, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3959 (10th Cir. March 13, 2015)*:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: An arrest during a larceny sting where a backpack was left near an ATM was not in violation of clearly established law; qualified immunity applies

CA6: Arrest of school teacher for sex abuse of student was not based on “reasonably trustworthy” information; false arrest case can proceed

School teacher’s arrest for anally sodomizing a student at school arguably lacked probable cause, and the student’s claims were not properly and fully investigated before the arrest after the story became more and more implausible. The student gave an implausible … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest of school teacher for sex abuse of student was not based on “reasonably trustworthy” information; false arrest case can proceed

Does the TSA run warrants on all passengers? Maybe

Defendant’s consent to search a box when he was in custody in a holding cell in Seattle airport’s jail was shown to be voluntary. He said “Go ahead. It’s just helicopter parts.” Heroin and meth were found in a radio … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Does the TSA run warrants on all passengers? Maybe

D.C.Cir.: Affirmance of def conviction for felonious assault on officer was a Heck bar to a Bivens action for his shooting

Plaintiff drove at U.S. Marshals, clipped their car, and fled from them, and they opened fire on him. He was convicted of felonious assault on one of the three officers, and acquitted as to the other two. This was a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Affirmance of def conviction for felonious assault on officer was a Heck bar to a Bivens action for his shooting

DC: 2009 consent was attenuated from 2007 search

2009 consent was attenuated from 2007 search. Dawkins v. United States, 12-CO-1648, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS __ (February 5, 2015), prior appeal 41 A.3d 1265, 1272-73 (D.C. 2012). Considering in detail all the evidence in the case, the court finds … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DC: 2009 consent was attenuated from 2007 search

CA10: Qualified immunity, clearly established law, and tasering as excessive force

Qualified immunity, clearly established law, and tasering as excessive force. Aldaba v. Pickens, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1822 (10th Cir. February 4, 2015): B. Clearly Established Law Having held that the alleged facts regarding the initial taser strike would be … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Qualified immunity, clearly established law, and tasering as excessive force

CA5: Use of deadly force to stop a fleeing driver with officer on running board was objectively reasonable

An officer attempted to arrest the driver of a vehicle on a warrant, but the driver refused to submit and drove off, with the officer on the running board. Ultimately, the officer shot and killed the driver. The use of … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Use of deadly force to stop a fleeing driver with officer on running board was objectively reasonable

CA7: Detention of a minor based on a report from a friend she was suicidal was reasonable

This minor’s § 1983 suit alleges a Fourth Amendment violation when she was taken to a hospital and subjected to a mental health examination based a report from a school friend that she had attempted to kill herself. The police … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Detention of a minor based on a report from a friend she was suicidal was reasonable

Cal.4: DV improper in state § 1983 case; 14 detention of guests at house at time of raid was likely unreasonable, and no QI

Plaintiff had a big annual Halloween party at his Orange County mansion that the neighbors always complained about. This one was called “Casino Night,” so the OCSO decided to get a search warrant and raid the place with the SWAT … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.4: DV improper in state § 1983 case; 14 detention of guests at house at time of raid was likely unreasonable, and no QI

OH2: Jaywalking supports a stop but not a frisk

Jaywalking supports a stop but not a frisk. State v. Millerton, 2015-Ohio-34, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 31 (2d Dist. January 9, 2015). Probable cause cuts off a state malicious prosecution and § 1983 action. Henderson v. City of Euclid, 2015-Ohio-15, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH2: Jaywalking supports a stop but not a frisk

CA5: Knock-and-announce still lives: No § 1983 qualified immunity for violation of rule

After discussing at length the purposes of the knock-and-announce rule and how well established it is, the court finds that the officer was not entitled to qualified immunity for a violation of the rule for entry into plaintiffs’ home without … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Knock and announce, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Knock-and-announce still lives: No § 1983 qualified immunity for violation of rule