CA6: Violation of some regulations may be “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation

There was probable cause for this § 1983 plaintiff’s arrest. While there may have been some violations of police regulations in how the controlled buy went down, a little “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation. Womack v. Conley, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23470 (6th Cir. December 11, 2014).

Odd and inconsistent travel plans of somebody with a local DL who said he was lost, towing a boat trailer with no LPN within 100 miles of the border was reasonable suspicion. Proximity to the border can be considered in the reasonable suspicion analysis. United States v. Sauzameda, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23459 (10th Cir. December 8, 2014).

Affidavit for the search warrant as a whole showed probable cause the target doctor sold steroids, and the search warrant wasn’t overbroad. There was no Franks violation. United States v. Rydze, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172658 (W.D. Pa. December 15, 2014).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.