Category Archives: Stop and frisk

MA: Crack pipe seen in plain view of passenger compartment justifies search of whole car

“The question presented by this appeal is whether a State trooper’s plain view observation of a used crack pipe in a motor vehicle provides probable cause for a warrantless search of the entire vehicle for contraband drugs. Concluding that it … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Crack pipe seen in plain view of passenger compartment justifies search of whole car

S.D.Miss.: Acting “shifty” during a stop justified patdown for officer safety

The patdown here was reasonable for officer safety because defendant was known to associate with firearms, wore baggy clothing that could have concealed a firearm, and he was acting “shifty” and “favoring his pockets.” United States v. Gillin, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Acting “shifty” during a stop justified patdown for officer safety

CA11: Inventory applied even if automobile exception not satisfied

The search of defendant’s car would have happened as a result of an inventory search whether or not the automobile exception applied. Therefore, inevitable discovery was satisfied. United States v. Russell, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820 (11th Cir. Feb. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA11: Inventory applied even if automobile exception not satisfied

CA9: 4A requires no less intrusive measures for inventory

The officers impounding defendant’s vehicle weren’t constitutionally required to allow him to contact others to take possession of the vehicle for him. United States v. Anderson, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 35865 (9th Cir. Dec. 29, 2022). See Metropolitan News-Enterprise Three … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: 4A requires no less intrusive measures for inventory

M.D.Fla.: 14 years of emails in a complicated tax fraud scheme wasn’t overbroad

Fourteen years worth of emails wasn’t overbroad here. “The case involves a complex tax evasion scheme taking place over many years and across international borders. A wide variety of documents would be relevant to prove this scheme. The warrant in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Neutral and detached magistrate, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: 14 years of emails in a complicated tax fraud scheme wasn’t overbroad

W.D.Wash.: Dog sniff in apt building breezeway violated no REP, and it was moot anyway

On the totality, there was probable cause for cell phone search warrants. One can attempt to explain away the pieces, but the totality shows it. A dog sniff in the breezeway of an apartment complex violated no reasonable expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Dog sniff in apt building breezeway violated no REP, and it was moot anyway

MI: No RS for getting def out of car for a frisk

Defendant’s stop was justified, but getting him out of the vehicle for a frisk was not. Suppressed. People v. Turner, 2022 Mich. App. LEXIS 4943 (Aug. 18, 2022) (2-1). On the totality, defendant consented to an interview in his own … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: No RS for getting def out of car for a frisk

NY2: Search of wallet during a frisk unreasonable

Officers violated the Fourth Amendment during defendant’s frisk when they removed his wallet from his pocket and searched it. People v. Lewis, 2022 NY Slip Op 04920, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4797 (2d Dept. Aug. 10, 2022). The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Overseizure, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NY2: Search of wallet during a frisk unreasonable

MI: Extending stop for photographs and fingerprints unreasonable

The Grand Rapids PD’s policy of photographing and fingerprinting people without probable cause or reasonable suspicion in a Terry stop violated the Fourth Amendment. It was a trespass on the body. Johnson v. Vanderkooi, 2022 Mich. LEXIS 1359 (July 22, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Extending stop for photographs and fingerprints unreasonable

CA4: Def’s Facebook post and demeanor justified stop-and-frisk

Defendant’s Facebook post and his past supported reasonable suspicion for his stop and frisk of his fanny pack at a fair. He was a known member of a violent gang with a felony conviction, his house had been recently shot … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Knock and talk, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s Facebook post and demeanor justified stop-and-frisk

CA7: Stop-and-frisk at gunpoint was reasonable

Defendant’s actions justified a stop and frisk at gunpoint, and it was still a mere detention and not an arrest. United States v. Olson, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 19744 (7th Cir. July 18, 2022):

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: Stop-and-frisk at gunpoint was reasonable

NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. People who live in a “high crime area” do not have lesser constitutional protection. The facts here just didn’t support a frisk, and he had a right to refuse one, and that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

N.D.Ala.: Imprecision in the SW affidavit isn’t a Franks violation

Imprecision in the affiant investigator’s words doesn’t equate to recklessness for Franks purposes. United States v. Tubbs, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73473 (N.D.Ala. Mar. 14, 2022).* Defendant’s alleged Franks violation wasn’t even material based on all the evidence that the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Imprecision in the SW affidavit isn’t a Franks violation

DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

A warrant for premises found a visitor there, and the record shows nothing about why he was searched and the trial court upheld it. “As discussed, the factors the trial court relied upon to validate the patdown of Mr. Bingman—his … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Voluntariness | Comments Off on DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

MS: Open fields covered by state const.; warrant required for administrative search

A warrant is required for administrative searches under the Mississippi constitution, which also protects all land owned by the complainant, including open fields. Plain view is inapplicable here. The exclusionary rule applies to this administrative search and seizure. Okhuysen v. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Open fields, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MS: Open fields covered by state const.; warrant required for administrative search

D.Conn.: CI was personally involved in info he provided, and he was further corroborated by an unrelated wiretap

The CI here was untested for prior reliability, but the information was detailed and had the CI’s personal involvement. Moreover, an unrelated wiretap provided some corroboration of the CI’s involvement. This probable cause finding is not a close call. If … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Conn.: CI was personally involved in info he provided, and he was further corroborated by an unrelated wiretap

N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

A defendant can’t use a 2241 habeas as a way to appeal denial of a motion to suppress by another district judge. Butler v. Cook, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247876 (N.D.Fla. Nov. 30, 2021). Controlled buys from defendant a few … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

MA: Driver’s and passenger’s conduct during traffic stop helped create RS for frisk of passenger in backseat

During a traffic stop, the driver and front seat passenger were argumentative and threatening for a fight. The officers surmised that this was a distraction from the vehicle because it could have a firearm in it. On the totality, there … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Driver’s and passenger’s conduct during traffic stop helped create RS for frisk of passenger in backseat

CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

Officer “Mathieson testified that it is his habit to ask about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies during traffic stops. In any event, police officers are permitted to stop a vehicle for a traffic violation and look for evidence of a … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

TX2: Unlawful stop-and-frisk leads to suppression of patdown and search and abandonment during flight

Defendant’s stop was without reasonable suspicion. His alleged consent was not voluntary and his flight and abandonment were not attenuated but were caused by the illegal stop and frisk. Massey v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 9820 (Tex. App. – … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Attenuation, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TX2: Unlawful stop-and-frisk leads to suppression of patdown and search and abandonment during flight