Category Archives: Warrant requirement

SC authorizes video or phone oath and presentation of SW affidavits

Remote communication technology has been used for court proceedings under Covid. It is expressly authorized for many other proceedings, including issuance of search warrants. The swearing of the affiant can be remote. Use of Remote Communications Technology, 2021 S.C. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on SC authorizes video or phone oath and presentation of SW affidavits

TX9: Court clerk can swear officer for SW application

The affidavit for search warrant does not have to be sworn to before the issuing magistrate under Texas law. A clerk will do. Fender v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 6605 (Tex. App. – Beaumont Aug. 9, 2021). No reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX9: Court clerk can swear officer for SW application

NC: Complete failure of SW affidavit to show or infer time voided it

The search warrant’s affidavit complete failure to specify the time couldn’t even be inferred from the totality, so the search warrant failed to show probable cause for issuance. State v. Logan, 2021-NCCOA-311, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 327 (July 6, 2021). … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Waiver, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NC: Complete failure of SW affidavit to show or infer time voided it

W.D.Ark.: Govt motion for voice exemplar granted

A blast from the past not seen in the case law in years: Defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in not providing a voice examplar on the government’s motion. United States v. McClain, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124835 (W.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Govt motion for voice exemplar granted

D.Vt.: CP SW doesn’t need a temporal limitation

A search warrant for child pornography doesn’t really need a temporal limitation, considering the nature of what’s sought. United States v. Johnson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122802 (D. Vt. June 29, 2021):

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Vt.: CP SW doesn’t need a temporal limitation

D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

Where the officers impermissibly delayed obtaining a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone, the good faith exception does not apply. The initial seizure of the phone was valid because it was left at a crime scene. United States v. Tisdol, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

MD: Tracking “court order” didn’t need to be called a “warrant” to be one

A “court order” for tracking defendant’s vehicle satisfied the warrant requirement, and it didn’t have to be called a search warrant. It was issued with probable cause, and the good faith exception applied. Whittington v. State, 2021 Md. LEXIS 255 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MD: Tracking “court order” didn’t need to be called a “warrant” to be one

E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

Redacted search warrant application showed probable cause even with redactions. United States v. Rivers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104195 (E.D. Mich. June 3, 2021). The officer had called for a tow truck for defendant’s car and an inventory was inevitable, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

CA6: Detention with handcuffing on RS permitted putting def in police car

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s detention, including putting him in a police car while they sorted it out. That was not yet an arrest. United States v. Rogers, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16160 (6th Cir. May 27, 2021). The … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA6: Detention with handcuffing on RS permitted putting def in police car

S.D.N.Y.: No precharge right of access to SW materials while investigation ongoing

The target of a search (here Rudy Giuliani) doesn’t have a precharge right of access to the materials where the investigation is ongoing. In re Search Warrants Executed on April 28, 2021, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101348 (S.D. N.Y. May … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No precharge right of access to SW materials while investigation ongoing

C.D.Cal.: SW materials remain sealed because investigation is “undisclosed”

While generally subject to disclosure, search warrant materials here remain sealed for the time being because the investigation has not been disclosed. In re L.A. Times Communications, LLC, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99766 (C.D. Cal. May 26, 2021). Disputed facts … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: SW materials remain sealed because investigation is “undisclosed”

S.D.Ohio: Govt doesn’t overcome right of access to seek to seal SW materials

The defense moved for access to search warrant materials for a potential motion to suppress. The government moved to seal them. The government’s motion is denied. There is generally a right of access in search warrant materials by the defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Govt doesn’t overcome right of access to seek to seal SW materials

N.D.Ind.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to provide the particularity, but it can if incorporated

The search warrant here is directed at a place and it’s not required to tie a person to it, unless it aids particularity. The affidavit for the warrant does not need to be particular but the warrant itself does. The … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to provide the particularity, but it can if incorporated

WV: Emergency order of protection was not functional equivalent of SW for entry into home

Officers with an emergency order of protection used it to enter defendant’s house and seize firearms. The protections of the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution are greater. The order was not, then, the functional equivalent of a warrant, and … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WV: Emergency order of protection was not functional equivalent of SW for entry into home

E.D.N.Y.: Summons to appear is not a 4A seizure

A summons to appear is not a seizure. Jianjun Li v. Village of Saddle Rock, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60705 (E.D. N.Y. Mar. 30, 2021). New York statute that special prosecutors have to give notice to elected DAs about, inter … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Summons to appear is not a 4A seizure

D.Minn.: Pleading warrant process “irregularities” without showing anything prejudicial insufficient

Defendant’s perceived “irregularities” with the warrants raising “troubling and unanswered questions concerning the integrity of the warrant process” essentially invites the court to speculate where he doesn’t. The court won’t do that. United States v. Jones, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Pleading warrant process “irregularities” without showing anything prejudicial insufficient

NY, Westchester Co.: NY’s Red Flag law doesn’t violate 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A, or 14A

As to the Fourth: “This Court finds that the search conducted herein pursuant to the ERPO statute was reasonable. Contrary to respondent’s assertion, the petitioner provided a sworn statement as to the basis for his belief that respondent was recently … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY, Westchester Co.: NY’s Red Flag law doesn’t violate 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A, or 14A

CA1: SWs are directed at places, too, and def didn’t need to be connected in the affidavit

Defendant made a Franks challenge. Removing the allegedly offending material still left probable cause. Defendant’s argument then was that the remainder still didn’t point to him, but that’s not the law: Search warrants are directed at places, too, not just … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA1: SWs are directed at places, too, and def didn’t need to be connected in the affidavit

CT: Police knowledge def’s cell phone was used to communicate with co-conspirators and victim was justification for seizure then SW

There were exigent circumstances for seizure of defendant’s cell phone incident to his arrest and probable cause for a search warrant to search it. The police developed information that the conspirators communicated with the victim by phone before the crime. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CT: Police knowledge def’s cell phone was used to communicate with co-conspirators and victim was justification for seizure then SW

CA3: Petition to revoke has to be based on a 4A showing of PC on oath or affirmation, and this was

The petition to revoke was based on probable cause and oath or affirmation and complied with the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Petlock, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 3865 (3d Cir. Feb. 11, 2021). Police responded to a suicide in progress … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Emergency / exigency, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA3: Petition to revoke has to be based on a 4A showing of PC on oath or affirmation, and this was