Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

OH10: Officers don’t need RS to approach someone on the street

Officers don’t need reasonable suspicion to approach a person for a potential consensual encounter. State v. Howard, 2021-Ohio-1792, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1734 (10th Dist. May 25, 2021). Defendant’s Facebook Live posting of him holding an AK-47 and smoking marijuana … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Officers don’t need RS to approach someone on the street

CA6: Disclosure of medical records to LEO by subpoena duces tecum doesn’t violate 4A

“[T]he disclosure of the plaintiffs’ medical records to law enforcement officers for the purpose of investigating Dr. Pompy’s allegedly illegal activities did not violate their Fourth Amendment rights or their constitutional right to privacy.” Micks-Harm v. Nichols, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA6: Disclosure of medical records to LEO by subpoena duces tecum doesn’t violate 4A

CA10: Nexus for CP can logically move when def does

Police had probable cause defendant uploaded child pornography from home. Then he moved. It was reasonable to assume his computers went with him to the new address, so nexus was sufficiently shown for probable cause there. United States v. Kilgore, … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA10: Nexus for CP can logically move when def does

AZ: Even if NCMEC was not private actor, it didn’t expand the prior private search

In Arizona, Fourth Amendment claims are decided first, then state constitutional claims. Google+, acting completely on its own, searched defendant’s photos folder stored with there. Moreover, it was only shown to be protecting its private business interests, not aid the … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on AZ: Even if NCMEC was not private actor, it didn’t expand the prior private search

NY1: Pretrial detainee doesn’t have equal protection right not to have jail calls recorded

A pretrial detainee at Riker’s Island didn’t have an equal protection right or a reasonable expectation of privacy in his telephone calls from the jail. People v. Jennings, 2021 NY Slip Op 03262, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3363 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: Pretrial detainee doesn’t have equal protection right not to have jail calls recorded

NY3: Dog sniff of person requires RS

On a matter of first impression, NY’s Third Department concludes that reasonable suspicion is required for a dog sniff of the person, and here there was reasonable suspicion. People v. Butler, 2021 NY Slip Op 03222, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Dog sniff of person requires RS

KS: Officer’s two calls to dispatch telling him there was a warrant was reasonable under Herring

Defendant’s arrest based on the officer’s two calls to dispatch insisting there was a warrant for defendant was reasonable reliance on a mistake of another under Herring. State v. Gilliland, 2021 Kan. App. LEXIS 21 (May 14, 2021). The French … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: Officer’s two calls to dispatch telling him there was a warrant was reasonable under Herring

E.D.N.C.: Window tint violations always require a stop

Window tint violations require a stop to verify. “But the Supreme Court has said that ‘[t]o be reasonable is not to be perfect, and so the Fourth Amendment allows for some mistakes on the part of government officials, giving them … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Window tint violations always require a stop

IA: Trespassing on RR property was RS for stop

Defendant’s parking on railroad property was trespassing at least, and it was reasonable for the officer to investigate whether it was drug use or underage drinking, what he’d usually find. “Assuming without deciding King was acting on a mere hunch … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Trespassing on RR property was RS for stop

D.Colo.: Federal law criminalizing marijuana makes dog sniff in recreational use state reasonable

Even though Colorado has decriminalized personal use of marijuana, a dog sniff is still reasonable under federal law because possession of marijuana is still a violation of federal law because it’s unlawful for “any purpose.” United States v. Spikes, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Federal law criminalizing marijuana makes dog sniff in recreational use state reasonable

PA: Stop for no LPN permitted running names of occupants

Not having a license plate justified defendant’s stop and then running names. Commonwealth v. Malloy, 2021 PA Super 90, 2021 Pa. Super. LEXIS 278 (May 7, 2021). The backup light being on while driving justifies a stop. People v. Ambrose, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Stop for no LPN permitted running names of occupants

CA7: Possibility an interloper put drug residue in trash out for collection doesn’t negate PC or what it might prove

The fact it’s possible that someone else could have dropped drug residue in defendant’s trash container at the street doesn’t negate probable cause. [It also shows the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy in trash containers at the street.] … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Possibility an interloper put drug residue in trash out for collection doesn’t negate PC or what it might prove

Cal.6: Fire capt’s search of cabinet of backyard shed unrelated to house fire wasn’t part of the exigency of the fire

A fire department captain in Santa Clara County searched a cabinet in a shed behind defendant’s house. The fire department was called to a house fire. He was looking for the source of smoke, and it wasn’t readily apparent the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.6: Fire capt’s search of cabinet of backyard shed unrelated to house fire wasn’t part of the exigency of the fire

WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

Where the stop exceeded reasonableness, the district court’s finding it was de minimus was error. It was less than the time for the dog sniff, but the dog had time to arrive. Mahaffy v. State, 2021 Wyo. LEXIS 71 (May … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

KS: 24 minute wait for drug dog with RS wasn’t unreasonable

A wait of 24 minutes for the drug dog to arrive after reasonable suspicion developed was reasonable and not excessive. State v. Arrizabalaga, 2021 Kan. LEXIS 50 (Apr. 30, 2021). The Border Patrol request to local police to stop defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Collective knowledge, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: 24 minute wait for drug dog with RS wasn’t unreasonable

KY: Violation of city code doesn’t justify stop

Defendant’s alleged violation of the city code, a violation, didn’t authorize a warrantless arrest and his stop. Commonwealth v. Wilson, 2021 Ky. App. LEXIS 65 (Apr. 30, 2021). Without explanation, there was probable cause for search of defendant’s cell phone … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Violation of city code doesn’t justify stop

FL1: Def’s setting up date via cell phone app where he sexually battered victim led to PC for SW for his cell phone

Defendant’s victim claimed to the police she was met through a phone app, sexually battered, and robbed. She identified defendant by his truck. “This information would have been enough to obtain a search warrant of Ferguson’s cell phones, even without … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on FL1: Def’s setting up date via cell phone app where he sexually battered victim led to PC for SW for his cell phone

PA: Asking for consent while DL and registration in hand unreasonably extended stop

Defendant’s alleged excessive nervousness during a traffic stop caused the officer to have him get out of the car after the warrant check came back clean. He had defendant’s DL and registration in hand when he asked for consent, and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Asking for consent while DL and registration in hand unreasonably extended stop

W.D.La.: When cash and heroin found in car search, a notebook could be seized

When heroin and cash were found in the search of a car based on the smell of marijuana, seizure of a notebook was reasonable. The notebook was limited information compared to a cell phone. United States v. Pierre, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.La.: When cash and heroin found in car search, a notebook could be seized

IA: Officer’s complying with 4A is not an element of the underlying crime for the jury

The officer’s complying with the Fourth Amendment in the stop and arrest is not an element of defendant’s crime [or any crime]. State v. Chivalan, 2021 Iowa App. LEXIS 381 (Apr. 28, 2021) [one can, in some cases, get an … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Officer’s complying with 4A is not an element of the underlying crime for the jury