Category Archives: Franks doctrine

TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to this warrant. He signed it but didn’t acknowledge swearing to it. “the Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically explained that ‘to convey the solemnity and critical … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

N.D.Ind.: Pro se def’s post-trial motion to dismiss for 4A issue he didn’t fully appreciate timely is denied

Pro se defendant can’t raise a post-trial Fourth Amendment claim because he didn’t fully understand the FBI 302 discussing the search. “What Defendant is experiencing are the real-world consequences that he was warned of when he elected to proceed pro … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Pro se def’s post-trial motion to dismiss for 4A issue he didn’t fully appreciate timely is denied

GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

Defendant’s argument about admission of a search warrant affidavit at trial was deemed abandoned even for plain error review. Coston v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 123 (June 10, 2025).* (Caution readers: I had this issue just this year: The prosecution … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

Paying daily “rent” in drugs is a business transaction without standing. “Although Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

S.D.Tex.: If you’re moving to suppress, at least say what is to be suppressed

Defendant moves to suppress without saying what it is that should be suppressed. [So why not just find it moot?] Defendant raises a Franks challenge and a lack of probable cause. He doesn’t prevail on either. United States v. Alhemoud, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: If you’re moving to suppress, at least say what is to be suppressed

D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

Reading a prisoner’s legal mail may violate the First Amendment, but he can’t show that it violated the Fourth Amendment because there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in prison and nothing interfered with his cases. Lewis v. Conway, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the government can justify a warrantless search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States v. Childs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101370 (D.N.J. May 28, 2025). Plaintiff’s false arrest claim isn’t barred by Heck, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

S.D.Cal.: FinCEN’s SWB GTO for financial reporting enjoined for APA reasons; 4A not reached yet

FinCEN’s Southwest Border Geographic Targeting Order (SWB GTO) for enhanced reporting requirements in certain zip codes appears to have been adopted without proper authority under the Administrative Procedure Act. The Fourth Amendment claim is deferred until later as unnecessary at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: FinCEN’s SWB GTO for financial reporting enjoined for APA reasons; 4A not reached yet

MT: No RS for continued stop, but def consented to it

The officer’s observation of “a driver’s nervousness, an unspecified prior history of drug use, and the officer’s assertion that the driver failed to pull over quickly enough do not alone combine to show particularized suspicion of illegal drug activity.” Nevertheless, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: No RS for continued stop, but def consented to it

D.Neb.: The fact of omissions from the affidavit for warrant that might have made it less incriminating doesn’t help any here; there was PC and evidence to be found

The fact the omissions from the warrant application might make it appear less incriminating doesn’t help here; the warrant was based on jail calls and pointed to evidence in defendant’s safe. That’s not a Franks violation. United States v. Wright, … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on D.Neb.: The fact of omissions from the affidavit for warrant that might have made it less incriminating doesn’t help any here; there was PC and evidence to be found

TX8: Motorcycle parked on driveway closer to road than house wasn’t on curtilage

Officers didn’t enter the curtilage to look at defendant’s motorcycle. It was parked on dirt strip driveway closer to the street than the house, all confirmed by bodycam. Groh v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3572 (Tex. App. – El … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX8: Motorcycle parked on driveway closer to road than house wasn’t on curtilage

S.D.Ind.: No REP in ALPR tracking; not as intrusive as GPS

Tracking defendant’s vehicle with automatic license plate readers can’t be equated with GPS placement, so Jones distinguished. There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in an LPN. There is also interesting Franks and staleness issues. Defendant got a Franks hearing but … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: No REP in ALPR tracking; not as intrusive as GPS

PA: No REP in data on use of EBT card

Appellant’s argument that the search incident failed because of a lack of an arrest warrant wasn’t presented below so it’s waived. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the data on his EBT card that Wawa wouldn’t turn over … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on PA: No REP in data on use of EBT card

TX5: Warrantless removal of GSR was reasonable

Warrantless swabbing for GSR from defendant’s hands was reasonable because of exigency because it could likely be immediately lost. Argumedo v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3375 (Tex. App. – Dallas May 16, 2025). Defendant’s Franks claim is more like … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on TX5: Warrantless removal of GSR was reasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks claim fails. The omitted allegedly exculpatory evidence either wasn’t material to the probable cause finding or wasn’t known by law enforcement at the time the warrant issued. In this circuit, the collective knowledge doctrine applies to warrantless searches, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge

E.D.Tenn.: Late discovery of a bodycam video supports reopening def’s Franks challenge

A late disclosed bodycam video support a Franks challenge, and defendant gets to reopen his suppression hearing. United States v. Price, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88965 (E.D. Tenn. May 9, 2025). A time gap in when a confederate checked into … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Border search, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Late discovery of a bodycam video supports reopening def’s Franks challenge

CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

Defendant’s nodding yes to a request to search was consent to search the car. The officers might have believed he didn’t have standing since he was a mere passenger at the time. He didn’t mention facts supporting standing until at … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

CA4: Where materiality fails under Franks, falsity doesn’t matter

The district court concluded that there was no false statement for Franks purposes, but that doesn’t even have to be decided. It certainly wasn’t material. Hedgepeth v. Nash Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868 (4th Cir. May 6, 2025).* It … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Where materiality fails under Franks, falsity doesn’t matter

IL: Paperwork discrepancies permitted a truck safety inspection

Continuation of a commercial moving truck stop for a safety inspection was reasonable after there were “paperwork discrepancies.” People v. Ivanchuk, 2025 IL App (4th) 241230, 2025 Ill. App. LEXIS 856 (May 1, 2025). Mere negligent omissions for a Franks … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Privileges | Comments Off on IL: Paperwork discrepancies permitted a truck safety inspection

W.D.N.Y.: SW application wasn’t defective because it used “reasonable cause” instead of “probable cause”

The search warrant application wasn’t defective because it used “reasonable cause” instead of “probable cause.” They are interchangeable. United States v. Tundo, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84283 (W.D.N.Y. May 2, 2025). Four months of pole camera surveillance on the front … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW application wasn’t defective because it used “reasonable cause” instead of “probable cause”