Category Archives: Franks doctrine

N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

A criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment. United States v. Sole, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2025).* Defendant’s stop for clearly overtinted windows was reasonable. Disagreement by witnesses over minor details didn’t matter. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

The search warrant was in the S.D. Tex., and the affiant found a mistake before it was finalized that he communicated to the AUSAs involved. The correction, however, wasn’t made before he signed it, and he didn’t notice it. When … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

NY Monroe Co.: The constitution doesn’t apply to citizen’s arrest

In a citizen’s arrest, if the citizen, not a law enforcement officer, violates the constitution or statute, the arrest will not be suppressed for that reason alone. His statement to an officer captured on video will not be suppressed because … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Private search, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY Monroe Co.: The constitution doesn’t apply to citizen’s arrest

TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

“Although the warrant did not specifically state that the blood was to be ‘tested,’ ‘analyzed,’ or ‘examined’ for such intoxicants, a logical, commonsense reading of the warrant shows that the warrant was meant to authorize such analysis because an intoxicating … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

S.D.Fla.: Def showed enough for a Franks violation with reckless false material fact

A misstated fact in the search warrant affidavit was material to probable cause because there was so much other stuff. United States v. Ibanez-Molina, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225948 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 25, 2024)*:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Def showed enough for a Franks violation with reckless false material fact

S.D.N.Y.: No stay of execution of a computer and cell phone SW after def was indicted

Defendant was arrested in Malaysia and a computer and cell phones were seized. He was then indicted in NYC. The nine-day delay in getting a warrant was not unreasonable considering defendant was in custody and unable to use them. A … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No stay of execution of a computer and cell phone SW after def was indicted

VI: GPS monitoring for pretrial release can be reasonable; here it was consented to as well

The VI code and rules of criminal procedure provide for electronic monitoring as a condition of pretrial release. GPS tracking is a search and involves a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy and would be reasonable if justified. Here it was … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VI: GPS monitoring for pretrial release can be reasonable; here it was consented to as well

S.D.W.Va.: Issuance of a criminal citation is not a seizure

Issuance of a hunting violation citation is not a seizure. Even if it was, there was probable cause. Defendant wildlife officer’s seizure of antlers from a taxidermist can proceed. Craft v. Gills, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219453 (S.D. W.Va. Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Issuance of a criminal citation is not a seizure

W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not arguing that state law was violated by the search in his federal case. Clark v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219107 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024).* Defense counsel could not be ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

CA2: No less intrusive measures requirement before seeking CSLI

“The CSLI and cell-site simulator warrants provided evidence of the general and specific location of one of Brown’s cell phones and, therefore, of Brown’s likely movements between his indictment and arrest. Brown contends that investigators procured these warrants by falsely … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: No less intrusive measures requirement before seeking CSLI

IN: Handswabbing for evidence doesn’t require advice of rights under state constitution

Handswabbing didn’t require advice of Pirtle rights under Indiana Constitution. DNA swabs don’t. Owens v. State, 2024 Ind. App. LEXIS 316 (Nov. 20, 2024).* The false statements in the affidavit for warrant were neither reckless nor intentional nor even material. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: Handswabbing for evidence doesn’t require advice of rights under state constitution

D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

A 48 hour pretrial detainee in a dry cell has no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209407 (D. Alaska Nov. 18, 2024).* Defendant’s Franks officer of proof with a proffered corrected affidavit for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

W.D.Tenn.: Def succeeds in a Franks challenge

Something we don’t see hardly ever: The omitted information was material to probable cause and the affiant omitted it thinking it didn’t matter. But it did. And the good faith exception doesn’t apply here. United States v. Pettigrew, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Def succeeds in a Franks challenge

E.D.Va.: The affiant’s passing on alleged exaggerations from other officers wasn’t material to PC

Relying on reports of other officers that could have been exaggerations in part didn’t show that the affiant was intentionally or recklessly misleading the court. Also, “the Defendant has failed to demonstrate that Officer Granville’s inclusion of the exaggerated statement … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: The affiant’s passing on alleged exaggerations from other officers wasn’t material to PC

PA: CI tip gave RS for dog sniff during stop

The CI’s tip gave reasonable suspicion to extend the stop for a dog sniff. Commonwealth v. Ortiz, 2024 PA Super 249, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS 467 (Oct. 29, 2024).* “Moreover, as noted above, Trooper Klun’s personal observation of Harris driving … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: CI tip gave RS for dog sniff during stop

OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

The record supported the finding that defendant’s wife consented to the search. Her behavior, including standing in the open doorway and not protesting the officer’s entry, indicated implied consent. In addition, the court found that he did not expressly deny … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

CA2: That a DNA sample was potentially excludable didn’t need to be disclosed in SW affidavit

There were two DNA samples here. The fact the second was potentially subject to suppression didn’t need to be disclosed in the affidavit for more testing. United States v. Green, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25836 (2d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: That a DNA sample was potentially excludable didn’t need to be disclosed in SW affidavit

S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable during a traffic stop to ask about firearms in the car

The traffic stop was reasonable, and it was also reasonable for the officer to just ask whether there was a gun in the car for safety reasons because carrying in legal in this state. United States v. Martin, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable during a traffic stop to ask about firearms in the car

IA: A brief detention at the scene is not “arrest” for speedy trial purposes

“Arrest” for speedy trial purposes doesn’t include a brief detention at the scene before the actual arrest. State v. Harris, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 79 (Oct. 4, 2024). Defendant satisfied his first Franks burden of a substantial preliminary showing of … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on IA: A brief detention at the scene is not “arrest” for speedy trial purposes

CA6: New evidence of possible Franks violation for successor habeas not adequate to possibly alter outcome

2255 petitioner’s successor petition claims newly discovered evidence from an FOIA response that casts doubt on the affidavit for the search warrant obtained in 2011. “So Duval has not shown that the search warrant affidavit contained a false statement. Nor … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: New evidence of possible Franks violation for successor habeas not adequate to possibly alter outcome