Category Archives: Franks doctrine

OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

The record supported the finding that defendant’s wife consented to the search. Her behavior, including standing in the open doorway and not protesting the officer’s entry, indicated implied consent. In addition, the court found that he did not expressly deny … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

CA2: That a DNA sample was potentially excludable didn’t need to be disclosed in SW affidavit

There were two DNA samples here. The fact the second was potentially subject to suppression didn’t need to be disclosed in the affidavit for more testing. United States v. Green, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25836 (2d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: That a DNA sample was potentially excludable didn’t need to be disclosed in SW affidavit

S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable during a traffic stop to ask about firearms in the car

The traffic stop was reasonable, and it was also reasonable for the officer to just ask whether there was a gun in the car for safety reasons because carrying in legal in this state. United States v. Martin, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable during a traffic stop to ask about firearms in the car

IA: A brief detention at the scene is not “arrest” for speedy trial purposes

“Arrest” for speedy trial purposes doesn’t include a brief detention at the scene before the actual arrest. State v. Harris, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 79 (Oct. 4, 2024). Defendant satisfied his first Franks burden of a substantial preliminary showing of … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on IA: A brief detention at the scene is not “arrest” for speedy trial purposes

CA6: New evidence of possible Franks violation for successor habeas not adequate to possibly alter outcome

2255 petitioner’s successor petition claims newly discovered evidence from an FOIA response that casts doubt on the affidavit for the search warrant obtained in 2011. “So Duval has not shown that the search warrant affidavit contained a false statement. Nor … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: New evidence of possible Franks violation for successor habeas not adequate to possibly alter outcome

AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

Defendant’s DNA was taken by warrant at the jail, and his admissions about the offense during that captured on bodycam were admitted at trial. There was no questioning; it was voluntary. Torres v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 457 (Sep. 25, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Custody, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

IL: No REP in ER trauma room

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a hospital ER trauma room, even though there is under state precedent in a single bedroom. People v. Turner, 2024 IL 129208, 2024 Ill. LEXIS 469 (Sept. 19, 2024). Defendant argued that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IL: No REP in ER trauma room

FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

Illegally parking [actually standing] in a handicapped spot was an objective basis for defendant’s stop. State v. Diaz, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7143 (Fla. 6th DCA Sep. 13, 2024).* Defendant’s mother’s consent was validly obtained just as a protective sweep … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

Defendant’s electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release. United States v. Ramadan, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23276 (6th Cir. Sep. 11, 2024). Plaintiff pleads an unreasonable strip search in prison, but the necessary … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

The government showed exigency for what they feared was imminent destruction of drugs for a warrantless entry and protective sweep. Then a warrant was obtained with probable cause. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163658 (N.D. Ga. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Pretext, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

M.D.Pa.: Def’s Franks challenge fails for being vague as to what was inadequate and even which warrants were being challenged

“First, on a fundamental level, Bressi’s Franks request is insufficiently specific for this Court to reconstruct the warrants. Bressi does not point to a specific search warrant he claims was obtained through Agent O’Malley’s intentional or reckless disregard for the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def’s Franks challenge fails for being vague as to what was inadequate and even which warrants were being challenged

AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors

AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors by Juan A. Lozano (“A former Houston police officer is responsible for the 2019 deaths of a couple during a raid of their home because his … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors

W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

Plaintiff raised a search issue in her underlying criminal case and lost. Later, she pled nolo and thus could not appeal. That’s final enough for collateral estoppel to apply in her § 1983 case. Harr v. Washington Area Humane Soc’y, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

CA4: A Franks challenge requires an offer of proof, and it cannot be conclusory

A Franks challenge requires an offer of proof, and it cannot be conclusory. United States v. Shaw, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 22585 (4th Cir. Sep. 5, 2024):

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: A Franks challenge requires an offer of proof, and it cannot be conclusory

N.D.Ind.: Slightly different trial testimony doesn’t make a Franks violation; it’s what the officer knew at the time

Slightly different trial testimony here didn’t support a Franks challenge. The officer swore to what he knew when he applied for the warrant, and that wasn’t false. United States v. Bates, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156420 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 30, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Slightly different trial testimony doesn’t make a Franks violation; it’s what the officer knew at the time

CA4: Def’s failure to explain Franks claim means no abuse of discretion in denying motion to suppress

“[W]e agree with the district court that nothing in either motion justified a Franks hearing because, at bottom, Bordeaux did not explain the basis for his multiple assertions of falsity or make a sufficient showing that the officers acting knowingly … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s failure to explain Franks claim means no abuse of discretion in denying motion to suppress

MA: There was exigency and more for a welfare check entry under Caniglia

A welfare check at defendant’s father’s house led to police entering without a warrant. “[O]fficers had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that the victim was in his house and in need of emergency assistance. Although the police may no … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: There was exigency and more for a welfare check entry under Caniglia

OH8: Citizen informant’s 911 call was RS under Navarette

The citizen informant’s 911 call that defendant was drunk, belligerent, and driving gave reasonable suspicion to stop defendant under Naverette. City of Parma v. Coyne, 2024-Ohio-3192, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3019 (8th Dist. Aug. 22, 2024). “And here, even expunging … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Citizen informant’s 911 call was RS under Navarette

N.D.Iowa: Verifying validity of an AW wasn’t unreasonable extension of stop

The stop was concededly valid, and a warrant was found. Verifying that the warrant is still out is not an unreasonable extension of the stop. United States v. Colquhoun, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149487 (N.D. Iowa Aug. 21, 2024). [Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Verifying validity of an AW wasn’t unreasonable extension of stop

N.D.Miss.: Def’s arguments against the PC showing in the SW go more toward a trial defense, not PC

Probable cause and good faith arguments about three images of child pornography in the affidavit out of 121 total, were more toward a defense of the charge and do not undermine probable cause. United States v. Murphy, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Def’s arguments against the PC showing in the SW go more toward a trial defense, not PC