Category Archives: Warrant execution

E.D.Mich.: When SW arrived for house, def’s vehicle parked two doors down could be searched with PC under automobile exception

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s house that included vehicles that were parked or came there. Defendant’s vehicle was parked two houses down from his house. The search of the vehicle was justified by the automobile exception. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: When SW arrived for house, def’s vehicle parked two doors down could be searched with PC under automobile exception

CA6: Looking under bed in a protective sweep still was plain view

The officer had to kneel down to look under defendant’s bed in a protective sweep, and he saw a gun. The gun was still in plain view, and the officer was legitimately in place. United States v. Fields, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA6: Looking under bed in a protective sweep still was plain view

N.D.Ohio: Officer doesn’t have to defer to mere chance motorist has CCL before seizing firearm in car

When a firearm was seen in defendant’s car, the officer did not have to even consider whether he was had a concealed carry license to seize it. Ferguson v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229451 (N.D.Ohio Dec. 1, 2021); … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Officer doesn’t have to defer to mere chance motorist has CCL before seizing firearm in car

D.Mass.: SW for premises included def’s separate locked bedroom

The search warrant for the premises also permitted a search of defendant’s locked separate bedroom only accessible from the common area. United States v. Cecchetelli, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224649 (D.Mass. Nov. 22, 2021). A host of things added up … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SW for premises included def’s separate locked bedroom

WV: Family court judge can’t conduct searches for marital property; search and seizure is an executive function

In a judicial discipline case, a family court judge who had a 20 year practice of searching parties’ homes for marital property is censured. Search and seizure is an executive function, not a judicial one. This is just inappropriate. In … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WV: Family court judge can’t conduct searches for marital property; search and seizure is an executive function

E.D.Mo.: One who could freely come and go from the house of another had standing

Defendant had a relationship with the property of another but he didn’t spend the night. He could come and go. That was sufficient for standing. The co-defendant’s case, however, already found probable cause. United States v. Futrell, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: One who could freely come and go from the house of another had standing

MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

A court can take judicial notice that execution of a search warrant at 11 pm is not during daylight hours in Mississippi. Doe v. Doe, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 473 (Nov. 9, 2021) (only recognizing rule; this is not a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nighttime search, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

UT: DNA SW can be executed by force; def has burden of showing unreasonable force was used to execute a DNA warrant on his person

A search warrant was issued for defendant’s DNA, and he resisted efforts to take it by buccal swab. He doesn’t challenge the probable cause, only the method of execution. He carries the burden of proof on the question of unreasonableness … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, DNA, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: DNA SW can be executed by force; def has burden of showing unreasonable force was used to execute a DNA warrant on his person

OH5: Def’s consent after being told drug dog was coming for her car wasn’t voluntary

The trial court held defendant’s consent was involuntary. She was asked for consent and told that a drug dog was coming so she might as well give it up. The conclusion is supported by the evidence and isn’t clearly erroneous. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Voluntariness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s consent after being told drug dog was coming for her car wasn’t voluntary

W.D.N.C.: Using a key to open a lockbox named in a SW rather than breaking it open is hardly unreasonable

Using defendant’s key to unlock a lockbox within the terms of the search warrant was not unreasonable. United States v. Frady, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205784 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2021).* [Does he really expect that breaking into it is the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Voluntariness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Using a key to open a lockbox named in a SW rather than breaking it open is hardly unreasonable

MA: PC and risk of destruction of evidence permitted warrantless entry into co-conspirator’s apartment after warning of raid created exigency

When police were executing a search warrant for evidence of identity theft and fraud, one of the co-conspirators called another in another apartment in the same building to say the police were on to them. That sufficiently raised fears of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MA: PC and risk of destruction of evidence permitted warrantless entry into co-conspirator’s apartment after warning of raid created exigency

D.Idaho: SW for stolen iPhone permitted plain view and seizure of drugs seen on execution

An iPhone was stolen. The owner reported to police it had been turned on at a particular address. Officers got a search warrant for that address, and entered. Drugs in plain view could be seized. United States v. Curiel, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Idaho: SW for stolen iPhone permitted plain view and seizure of drugs seen on execution

IL: Mere visitor present at time of SW execution could not be searched without reason

Defendant was merely on the premises raided, and he was clearly not the person sought. There were no furtive gestures or other justification. The search of his person was unreasonable. People v. Duffie, 2021 IL App (1st) 171620, 2021 Ill. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IL: Mere visitor present at time of SW execution could not be searched without reason

MO: SW for cell phone at def’s house wasn’t properly executed on his phone at police station

This cell phone search warrant was for a black Samsung in a black case at defendant’s address. It was executed at the police department, not defendant’s house. The trial court properly suppressed and properly held the good faith exception did … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MO: SW for cell phone at def’s house wasn’t properly executed on his phone at police station

WaPo: Prince George’s officer accused of erasing cellphone as agents executed search warrant

WaPo: Prince George’s officer accused of erasing cellphone as agents executed search warrant by Katie Mettler (“Edward “Scott” Finn, a former Prince George’s County police officer who faced previous allegations of misconduct, has been indicted by a federal grand jury … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Prince George’s officer accused of erasing cellphone as agents executed search warrant

CA11: Govt filter team for review of seized materials not per se unreasonable; stringent protocol followed

The use of a government filter time to review seized materials implicating the attorney-client privilege is not per se unreasonable. The USMJ ordered compliance with a more stringent protocol than approved in other cases. Injunction denied. In re Sealed Search … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Govt filter team for review of seized materials not per se unreasonable; stringent protocol followed

C.D.Ill.: Failure to execute state SW in 10 days doesn’t automatically trigger exclusionary rule

Failure to execute a state search warrant within 10 days (F.R.Crim.P. 41) where state law says 60 days does not automatically trigger the exclusionary rule. The affidavit for the warrant showed probable cause, and the good faith exception also applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Failure to execute state SW in 10 days doesn’t automatically trigger exclusionary rule

W.D.Tex.: SJ denied for raid on wrong house

Police raided the wrong house and got sued. Summary judgment is denied. The supervising officer and others there knew within one minute they had the wrong house, but they continued and kept plaintiff handcuffed. And nobody in the raiding party … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: SJ denied for raid on wrong house

S.D.N.Y.: Late return of SW materials in discovery wasn’t at all prejudicial

The return of the search warrant materials was late, but defendant shows no prejudice, and he had them in discovery. United States v. Lesane, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137777 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2021). Defendant’s discovery claim that the government must … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Late return of SW materials in discovery wasn’t at all prejudicial

TN: AT&T’s requirement cell phone record SWs go through FL office doesn’t deprive court of jurisdiction

The fact AT&T wants cell phone search warrant for a Tennessee cell phone to be served at West Palm Beach, Florida for its convenience does not make the warrant without jurisdiction. The digital information could be accessed from anywhere, but … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: AT&T’s requirement cell phone record SWs go through FL office doesn’t deprive court of jurisdiction