Category Archives: Good faith exception

CA10: PC doesn’t need to be decided where GFE would apply; overbroad SWs are severed

Probable cause does not have to be decided where the good faith exception would apply. The warrant was for firearm evidence and had a cell phone search provision. If the cell phone provision was overbroad, that should be severed and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Overseizure, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: PC doesn’t need to be decided where GFE would apply; overbroad SWs are severed

S.D.W.Va.: Uncorroborated CI, criminal history, and inconclusive trash pull didn’t support SW for house; no GFE

“Pending before the court is Defendant’s motion to suppress 48 pounds of methamphetamine, $41,000 in cash, and all other evidence seized during a search of his residence by the Metropolitan Drug Enforcement Network Team (‘MDENT’). I find that neither the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Uncorroborated CI, criminal history, and inconclusive trash pull didn’t support SW for house; no GFE

E.D.Mo.: Constitutionality of window tint statute doesn’t have anything to do with PC for a stop for overtinting

Even if Missouri’s window tint statute was unconstitutional, something in doubt, it wouldn’t have any affect on the reasonableness of defendant’s stop for violating it, and the exclusionary rule would not apply. Factually, the officer said he couldn’t see into … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Constitutionality of window tint statute doesn’t have anything to do with PC for a stop for overtinting

N.D.Okla.: SW for Native American lands issued by state court judge that may be invalid under McGirt v. Oklahoma is saved by GFE

A state search warrant for Native American lands that later may be invalid because it was not issued by a tribal or federal court under McGirt v. Oklahoma is saved by the good faith exception. United States v. Hamett, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Foreign searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: SW for Native American lands issued by state court judge that may be invalid under McGirt v. Oklahoma is saved by GFE

GFE is not an exception to warrant requirement, only the exclusionary rule (dissent)

Per the dissent, the Michigan Court of Appeals erred in holding in an unpublished opinion that the good faith exception is an exception to the warrant requirement, not the exclusionary rule. People v. Mead, 2020 Mich. App. LEXIS 6223 (Sept. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GFE is not an exception to warrant requirement, only the exclusionary rule (dissent)

CA4: Def had burden on GFE, and he failed

Assuming without deciding the probable cause question, defendant fails to prove that the good faith exception should not be applied. United States v. Parrish, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10533 (4th Cir. Apr. 13, 2021). The officer had probable cause to … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: Def had burden on GFE, and he failed

N.D.Iowa: 27 month delay in seeking SW for cell phone was unreasonable, and GFE not applied

A 27 month delay in getting a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was unreasonable, and the good faith exception is not applied. United States v. Tu Anh Nguyen, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70671 (N.D. Iowa Mar. 16, 2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: 27 month delay in seeking SW for cell phone was unreasonable, and GFE not applied

CA8: Lack of nexus saved by GFE

Even without an adequate showing of nexus, search warrants have been sustained under the good faith exception. This is one of those cases where the inference is close enough. United States v. Mayweather, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10208 (8th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA8: Lack of nexus saved by GFE

GA: Valid strategic choice to forego search claim to support defense

Involving pre-Carpenter CSLI, the defense had valid strategic reasons to forego a motion to suppress to support the defense arguments at trial. “Because we hold that Thomas’s trial counsel did not perform deficiently because she had a reasonable strategic purpose … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on GA: Valid strategic choice to forego search claim to support defense

CA8: While the stated reason for the stop was maybe legally erroneous, there was a valid unstated alternative basis

Officers stated an improper lane change as their basis for a stop, but it might not have been illegal under Nebraska law. However, they already had reason to believe the registration on the vehicle was lapsed, and that’s a proper … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: While the stated reason for the stop was maybe legally erroneous, there was a valid unstated alternative basis

S.D.N.Y.: Def counsel’s strategic decisions about how to argue a suppress issue is entitled to deference

Defense counsel’s strategic decisions about to argue a suppression motion is entitled to nearly total deference. Brown v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63948 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 1, 2021). Petitioner’s 2255 claim is based on defense counsel’s not raising … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def counsel’s strategic decisions about how to argue a suppress issue is entitled to deference

CA6: When the question of nexus is close, GFE is the answer

When the question of nexus of probable cause of a crime to a defendant’s home is close, the good faith exception provides the answer. United States v. Reed, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 9526 (6th Cir. Apr. 1, 2021):

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: When the question of nexus is close, GFE is the answer

IL: CSLI 11 years before Carpenter obtained in good faith

CSLI data obtained 11 years before Carpenter was obtained in good faith at the time and would not be suppressed. People v. Potts, 2021 IL App (1st) 161219, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 166 (Mar. 31, 2021). Defense counsel was not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IL: CSLI 11 years before Carpenter obtained in good faith

W.D.Ark.: Officer acting outside his local jurisdiction isn’t 4A issue

“Mr. van Leeuwen also claims that Boone County officers were without jurisdiction when they arrested him in his Marion County home, in alleged violation of Arkansas Code § 14-15-501. However, ‘[a] police violation of state law does not establish a … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Officer acting outside his local jurisdiction isn’t 4A issue

D.V.I.: CI’s information of def was commonly known and in paper; yet, GFE applies

The search warrant here was based on the CI’s relating largely publicly-known information, some of which was in the newspaper online. It wasn’t predictive, but all historical of criminal record, the kind of car, etc. This is close but no … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on D.V.I.: CI’s information of def was commonly known and in paper; yet, GFE applies

LA1: Evading a traffic stop justifies a patdown

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense. His evading justified a patdown. State v. Young, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 377 (La. App. 1 Cir. Mar. 18, 2021). “In this case, the Court need not determine whether the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA1: Evading a traffic stop justifies a patdown

W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant had a duty to address the good faith exception in his motion and amended motion to suppress a search under a warrant, but he did not. United States v. Lyons, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48780 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

Defendant prevails in his Franks challenge. The police withheld that defendant was at worst a suspect in personal use of marijuana, but made it look like he was a trafficker when they had no evidence of it. That means that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

CA7: Pre-Riley warrantless cell phone search saved by GFE

Defendant’s cell phone was searched without a warrant pre-Riley under law at the time. “If the evidence collected during the search was to be admitted, he contends, it was only through the application of the good-faith exception recognized in Davis … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA7: Pre-Riley warrantless cell phone search saved by GFE

S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation

The Franks hearing established that the officer didn’t know that certain things happened during the investigation, so the officer wasn’t withholding information or misleading the court. Probable cause and nexus is [less than] tenuous: “This evidence, standing alone, does not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation