N.D.Cal.: Some wiretap records are unsealed on request from press

The press sought unsealing of wiretapping related materials, and the parties are asked for their positions. The court orders partial release. United States v. Chow, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114802 (N.D.Cal. August 28, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Some wiretap records are unsealed on request from press

ID: Consent to a BAC test in the face of the sanctions for refusal is not unconstitutional coercion

Consent to a BAC test in the face of the sanctions for refusal is not unconstitutional coercion. State v. Riendeau, 2015 Ida. LEXIS 218 (August 24, 2015).

Exigency of looking for the victim of a serious crime justified the entry into the dwelling. [This appeal was 21 years after the conviction, and there is no constitutional right to a speedy appeal.] Crawford v. State, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 445 (August 27, 2015).

Defendant was seized when officers made her lock her purse in her car at the police station and give them the keys. She later asked for her purse and was given it, but she will still not free to leave the presence of law enforcement. State v. Emerson, 2015 MT 254, 2015 Mont. LEXIS 441 (August 26, 2015).*

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Consent to a BAC test in the face of the sanctions for refusal is not unconstitutional coercion

ND: State didn’t even attempt to justify inventory; policy was required to be proved

The trial court did not err in finding that the impoundment and inventory was unreasonable. The vehicle was unlicensed, but the officer did not decide to inventory it until he found out defendant gave him a false identification. The state had the burden on proving validity of inventory and it failed. “The State did not provide the district court with any documents required by this directive. The State did not request a hearing during which it could have presented testimony explaining how impounding the vehicle qualified as a caretaking function, rather than an investigative purpose, nor did it provide an affidavit explaining why the officer impounded the vehicle. While the State is not required to introduce testimony, it must present evidence to demonstrate the warrantless search meets an exception to the warrant requirement. Lanctot, 1998 ND 216, ¶ 9, 587 N.W.2d 568.” State v. Pogue, 2015 ND 211, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 227 (August 25, 2015).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ND: State didn’t even attempt to justify inventory; policy was required to be proved

ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

A drug dog putting his nose up to the open window during an exterior dog sniff was not a search of the interior. The officers didn’t tell him to do it, and the dog was just following his smell (citing cases). State v. Naranjo, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 75 (August 26, 2015).

In a Franks challenge, proof of a knowing falsity is required, and showing a statement might have been merely with reckless disregard for the truth doesn’t measure up. United States v. Barnes, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113842 (E.D.La. August 27, 2015).

The warrantless blood draw here was justified by implied consent. Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging the blood draw under McNeely. Sims v. State, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 74 (August 24, 2015).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

C.D.Ill.: Calls to wife showed exigency for potential removal of drugs hidden in safe in house

Defendant’s calls to his wife showed there was exigency in the contents of a safe at their house because he wanted it moved immediately. That was exigency. Also, she had apparent authority to consent. United States v. Simmons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113332 (C.D.Ill. August 26, 2015).*

Defendant’s wife had apparent authority to consent to a search of his backpack in a domestic battery case. The backpack was always with him, or them if they were together, and held a gun, and she knew it. At the time of the search, it was in a vehicle under her control. United States v. Montemayor, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112204 (S.D.Tex. August 25, 2015).*

Defendant’s IAC claim against defense counsel for failing to cite a specific case that is almost factually identical fails because defendant was a parolee, and that’s a big difference on the reasonable expectation of privacy he had. United States v. Sandlain, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112869 (E.D.Mich. August 26, 2015).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Calls to wife showed exigency for potential removal of drugs hidden in safe in house

OH3: Home burglar alarm company call and partially open door is exigency

Home burglar alarm brought the police via the alarm company. They found the door cracked open, and that was exigent circumstances for an entry. State v. Foster, 2015-Ohio-3401, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3316 (3d Dist. August 24, 2015).

The certified search question here is not dispositive of the case, so the appeal is dismissed. State v. Snider, 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 681 (August 25, 2015).*

Defendant was driving a rental car in somebody else’s name, and he gave a false name. It took awhile, but the officers ascertained that defendant had a parole warrant out for him. He lacked standing in the car. United States v. Byrd, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113281 (M.D.Pa. August 26, 2015).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on OH3: Home burglar alarm company call and partially open door is exigency

CA3: Sexual advances in a gov’tal workplace are not a Fourth Amendment search or seizure

“While Fourth Amendment protections may extend to ‘[s]earches and seizures by government employers or supervisors,’ O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 715, 107 S. Ct. 1492, 94 L. Ed. 2d 714 (1987), we agree with the District Court that the Fourth Amendment does not provide a cause of action for unwanted sexual advances in the workplace, and Goodall-Gaillard points to no caselaw and offers no cogent argument supporting such a claim.” Goodall-Gaillard v. N.J. Dep’t of Corr., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14887 (3d Cir. August 24, 2015).

A Mirandized defendant produced a key to a storage unit and consented to its search. United States v. Zuhrieh, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113324 (D.N.M. July 21, 2015).*

Posted in Consent, Search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Sexual advances in a gov’tal workplace are not a Fourth Amendment search or seizure

CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

Not a search and seizure case, but we need to know it:

It was established in 1984 at the time of one plaintiff’s conviction and 1991 of the other plaintiff that police had a duty to provide exculpatory evidence to the prosecutor. Qualified immunity denied. Plaintiffs can see damages under § 1983 since they secured habeas relief. Carrillo v. County of Los Angeles, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15066 (9th Cir. August 26, 2015) (“Here, the right being violated is, by its terms, significantly more specific than the ‘extremely abstract’ right of freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. See Anderson, 483 U.S. at 639.”).

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

S.D.Ala.: Asking def about his money unlawfully extended stop

After the traffic stop, defendant should have been released. As he tried to go, questions about his money unreasonably extended the stop. United States v. Snowden, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112966 (S.D.Ala. August 26, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Asking def about his money unlawfully extended stop

CA1: Govt proved independent source for SW; nexus to computer shown by its proximity to forged documents

Removing the information from the alleged illegal search from the affidavit for search warrant still shows probable cause from independent sources, and the motions to suppress were properly denied. Nexus to search one defendant’s computer came from his carrying it into the bank where fraudulent cashier’s checks were obtained and its proximity to forged documents. United States v. Santos-Soto, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14964 (1st Cir. August 25, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Nexus | Comments Off on CA1: Govt proved independent source for SW; nexus to computer shown by its proximity to forged documents

CA5: Using a Taser on a person no longer resisting is excessive force

Using a Taser on a person no longer resisting is excessive force. The mentally ill plaintiff was at first resisting but then stopped. At that point, it became excessive. Carroll v. Ellington, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15098 (5th Cir. August 26, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Using a Taser on a person no longer resisting is excessive force

D.C.Cir. dissolves injunction against telephony metadata collection sanctioned by FISA

D.C.Cir. dissolves injunction against telephony metadata collection sanctioned by FISA. Klayman v. Obama, 15-5001 (D.C.Cir. August 28, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on D.C.Cir. dissolves injunction against telephony metadata collection sanctioned by FISA

Baltimore Sun: Public defender’s office to review cases involving stingray technology

Baltimore Sun: Public defender’s office to review cases involving stingray technology by Jessica Anderson:

The Baltimore public defender’s office said it plans to review nearly 2,000 cases in which police used a controversial cellphone surveillance tool without defense attorneys’ knowledge, and decide whether to challenge them….Defense attorney Andrew Alperstein said a ‘systematic review needs to happen’ in stingray cases because the state’s attorney’s office might have secured a conviction without proper disclosure. ‘It’s a national problem,’ Alperstein said, noting the issue was a hot topic at a recent meeting of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Baltimore Sun: Public defender’s office to review cases involving stingray technology

Ars Technica: License plate reader led police to man who killed reporter, cameraman

Ars Technica: License plate reader led police to man who killed reporter, cameraman by David Kravets (“As soon as it was entered, it came up with a positive hit.'”):

The man who authorities said infamously killed two Virginia television journalists Wednesday was tracked down by police via license plate reader technology, according to law enforcement.

A Virginia state trooper told a news conference Wednesday that she hit Vester Lee Flanagan’s plate number on her first try along Interstate 66 around 11:20am ET. “As soon as it was entered, it came up with a positive hit that that vehicle just passed me less than three minutes earlier,” she said. “I let my dispatch know that the vehicle has passed me and I attempted to catch up with the vehicle, which was travelling eastbound on 66.”

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Ars Technica: License plate reader led police to man who killed reporter, cameraman

Daily Business Review: Employers Need Policies on Searching Worker Smartphones

Daily Business Review: Employers Need Policies on Searching Worker Smartphones by Suhaill Morales:

In the wake of NFL quarterback Tom Brady destroying his cell phone in the midst of the NFL Deflategate investigation, the incident took a turn from sports scandal into a question of workplace privacy.

Brady’s subsequent comment about how his employer should respect his “rights as a private citizen” also brought to light the issue of whether an employee’s personal cell phone is truly private. So can an employer legally search through its employees’ personal cell phones? Well, it depends mostly on the employer’s written policies.

Posted in Cell phones, Private search | Comments Off on Daily Business Review: Employers Need Policies on Searching Worker Smartphones

ACLU blog: ACLU Suit Shows the DOJ Gathered Location Data Without Probable Cause

ACLU blog: ACLU Suit Shows the DOJ Gathered Location Data Without Probable Cause by Linda Lye:

After three years of litigation, we’ve finally settled a portion of one of our long-running Freedom of Information Act suits against the federal government for information about its location tracking practices. A person’s digital location information reveals detailed, private information that the government should only be able to get through a warrant based on probable cause. As part of this settlement, the government provided us with information about the types of court orders it obtains to get location information.

In particular, we learned that from 2008 to 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California overwhelmingly relied on so-called “hybrid orders” to obtain location information. Unlike more privacy-protective warrants that require probable cause, hybrid orders have a lower burden of proof. In other words, with hybrid orders, the government doesn’t need to show an especially good reason to snoop into your location history.

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on ACLU blog: ACLU Suit Shows the DOJ Gathered Location Data Without Probable Cause

CA11: Wife having computer password showed her apparent authority over it

It was reasonable for police to believe that defendant’s wife had apparent authority to consent to providing the password to them to search his laptop. He argued that he gave it for the limited purpose of fixing a printer problem, but the police had every reason to believe she had apparent authority to consent to it. United States v. Groover, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14966 (11th Cir. August 25, 2015).

Defendant’s wife had apparent authority to consent to a search of their joint property, even though they were in a domestic dispute. United States v. Montemayor, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112204 (S.D.Tex. August 25, 2015).*

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on CA11: Wife having computer password showed her apparent authority over it

The Guardian: Digital surveillance ‘worse than Orwell’, says new UN privacy chief

The Guardian: Digital surveillance ‘worse than Orwell’, says new UN privacy chief by Adam Alexander

Joseph Cannataci describes British oversight as ‘a joke’ and says a Geneva convention for the internet is needed.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Guardian: Digital surveillance ‘worse than Orwell’, says new UN privacy chief

HuffPo: Roadside Strip Searches and Other Police State Indignities

HuffPo: Roadside Strip Searches and Other Police State Indignities by John W. Whitehead.

(The URL says “the raping of america roa”)

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on HuffPo: Roadside Strip Searches and Other Police State Indignities

M.D.La.: Search incident couldn’t be used to justify search here days after the controlled buy that gave cause

The search incident doctrine can’t be used to justify a search incident to a warrantless arrest days after the event that gave the probable cause. The arrest can’t be manipulated like that. An arrest warrant could certainly have issued, but they didn’t get one here. United States v. Clark, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112076 (M.D.La. August 24, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search incident | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Search incident couldn’t be used to justify search here days after the controlled buy that gave cause