M.D.Fla.: Def failed to show equitable right to return of property under 41(g) while he’s in jail

Defendant failed to make a showing for equitable relief for return of property under Rule 41(g) while he’s in jail. United States v. Rehaif, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61019 (M.D. Fla. April 4, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Def failed to show equitable right to return of property under 41(g) while he’s in jail

S.D.N.Y.: Issue preclusion: Same search litigated in NJ state courts in 2014 and def lost; can’t relitigate here. Besides, he’d lose on merits, too

Defendant was charged in New Jersey as a result of the same search as here. He fully litigated in state court and lost, and appealed and lost. That qualifies for issue preclusion in federal court in NYC because he had reason to litigate fully and did. On the merits, he loses anyway. United States v. Shaw, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58433 (S.D. N.Y. April 13, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Issue preclusion: Same search litigated in NJ state courts in 2014 and def lost; can’t relitigate here. Besides, he’d lose on merits, too

IA: Where IAC claims based on persuading for overruling of settled law, def counsel hardly ineffective

Defendant’s argument on post-conviction that defense counsel should have argued for overruling of state authority on the search incident and automobile exception doctrines because of subtle changes in the law isn’t grounds for post-conviction. All that shows is that the law was essentially settled at the time and defendant can’t show prejudice. White v. State, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 366 (April 19, 2017)

Defense counsel wasn’t timely in filing a motion to suppress the search in this case, but the trial court also denied it on the merits. The court of appeals considers the merits, too, and defendant wasn’t prejudiced where he loses anyway. State v. Kemp, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 373 (April 19, 2017).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IA: Where IAC claims based on persuading for overruling of settled law, def counsel hardly ineffective

Yahoo! Tech: A Former NSA Lawyer Explains Why Searching Phones at the Border Is a Waste of Time

Yahoo! Tech: A Former NSA Lawyer Explains Why Searching Phones at the Border Is a Waste of Time by Brian Feldman

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Yahoo! Tech: A Former NSA Lawyer Explains Why Searching Phones at the Border Is a Waste of Time

Arkansas Times: State spends $30,000 drug testing TANF recipients for drugs, nabs 2

Think Progress: States spend millions to drug test the poor, turn up few positive results by Josh Isreal (“They spent $1.3 million to find just 369 drug users.”)

My own state: Arkansas Times: State spends $30,000 drug testing TANF recipients for drugs, nabs 2 by Leslie Newell Peacock:

In Arkansas, there were 3,040 applicants for TANF in 2016 after the legislation passed in 2015. Only six people were tested. Two came back positive. Cost: $30,243.

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Arkansas Times: State spends $30,000 drug testing TANF recipients for drugs, nabs 2

WaPo: Why it matters that Google Home can now identify you by voice

WaPo: Why it matters that Google Home can now identify you by voice by Hayley Tsukayama:
Consumers should also think about how this information could be used outside of the company, Shear said. He pointed to a recent murder case in Arkansas in which police asked Amazon for audio recorded from the suspect’s home hub, the Echo.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Why it matters that Google Home can now identify you by voice

N.D.Cal.: Google mail stored overseas but only accessible from U.S. subject to SW here

The Stored Communications Act can apply extraterritorially when the data is stored overseas but it can only be accessed from Google here in the U.S. In re Search of Content that is Stored at Premises Controlled by Google, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59990 (N.D. Cal. April 19, 2017) (distinguishing In the Matter of a Warrant to Search a Certain EMail Account Controlled & Maintained by Microsoft Corp., 829 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2016)):
Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Google mail stored overseas but only accessible from U.S. subject to SW here

Three on consent

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress a search by consent where the consenter admitted during a pretrial deposition that she consented. Banks v. State, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 893 (April 20, 2017).*

Defendant’s father consented to the entry to arrest him and the police had probable cause. Therefore, his statement was correctly admitted. State v. Griffin, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 706 (La.App. 3 Cir. April 19, 2017).*

Defendant’s consent given after an entry assumed by the court to be unlawful that he didn’t know about was purged of any taint. State v. Barcus, 2017 N.H. LEXIS 43 (Feb. 15, 2017) .*

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on Three on consent

WaPo: Civil Rights Attorneys Raise Concerns About NYPD Body-Camera Program

WaPo: Civil Rights Attorneys Raise Concerns About NYPD Body-Camera Program by Zolan Kanno-Youngs:
Policy gives officers too much discretion for when to activate devices, police-reform advocates say

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: Civil Rights Attorneys Raise Concerns About NYPD Body-Camera Program

CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

The discovery of the contraband was by inevitable discovery because an inventory was going to occur in any event. The fact the policy wasn’t written isn’t determinative as long as it is reasonable. United States v. Bullette, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6886 (4th Cir. April 20, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

CA5: Arrest w/o PC can be retaliatory for refusing to answer questions at stop w/o RS

Plaintiff claimed he was arrested, handcuffed, and shackled simply for refusing to give his name and answer questions when he was stopped in a hotel parking lot apparently solely because of the officer’s curiosity. [At least plaintiff so plead because this was decided on a motion to dismiss.] He stated a claim for retaliatory arrest without probable cause under the Fourth Amendment. His Fifth and First Amendment retaliation claims, however, fail. Alexander v. City of Round Rock, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6692 (5th Cir. April 18, 2017).

WaPo: Can the police retaliate against a citizen for refusing to answer police questions? by Orin Kerr:
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: Arrest w/o PC can be retaliatory for refusing to answer questions at stop w/o RS

MT: Def was driving parents’ car and they had equal or superior authority to consent to its search

Defendant, a known drug user and suspected dealer, was driving his parents’ car, and they gave consent to search it. “Miller had permission from his parents to use the vehicle and thus had common, if not superior, authority to Baty to consent to the of search the vehicle. Additionally, the record supports the conclusion that the police removed Baty from the vehicle because he was operating it unlawfully, not because they sought to avoid a possible objection from Baty regarding the search.” State v. Baty, 2017 MT 89, 2017 Mont. LEXIS 172 (April 18, 2017).

The officer had reasonable suspicion for a stop for a lane violation, and he then saw and smelled the defendant and had reasonable suspicion he was DUI. State v. Andrews, 2017-Ohio-1383, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 1405 (2d Dist. April 14, 2017).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on MT: Def was driving parents’ car and they had equal or superior authority to consent to its search

C.D.Ill.: Long term borrower of car has standing

One who borrows a car for a long time has standing. “And the Court is persuaded that society is prepared to accept as reasonable a person’s subjective expectation of privacy in a car borrowed for months on end from a friend. Without such an expectation, the very notion of ‘borrowing’ would make little sense.” “Additionally, Coleman also likely has standing to challenge the search of the car because it was a consequence of the seizure of his person.” United States v. Coleman, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59110 (C.D. Ill. April 18, 2017).

Defendant claimed his counsel was ineffective for not telling him that a guilty plea waived his search and seizure claims. He can’t show prejudice because the search wasn’t invalid anyway. United States v. Hardee, 2017 CCA LEXIS 263 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. April 17, 2017).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Long term borrower of car has standing

D.Nev.: Def’s unsupported allegation judge didn’t sign SW overcome by officer’s testimony

Defendant’s unsupported testimony that the search warrant does not appear to have a judge’s original signature on it fails in the face of testimony from the officer that he saw the judge sign it. The fact it took 120 days to complete the forensic investigation of the seized hard drives isn’t worthy of suppression where the warrant didn’t specify a time. Failure to return property doesn’t require suppression either. United States v. Gibson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58133 (D.Nev. Jan. 11, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58136 (D. Nev. April 14, 2017).* [Note: I have seen what appears to be digital pdf signatures inserted into warrants. If the warrant is being transmitted by email and the judge did it or caused it to be done, having read the affidavit and warrant, a pdf signature is not a constitutional violation.]

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def’s unsupported allegation judge didn’t sign SW overcome by officer’s testimony

CA2: Open container violation supports SI

Open container violation in NYC supported a search incident to an arrest. The officer was first going to issue a summons but did a patdown and arrested when the gun was found. United States v. Diaz, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6579 (2d Cir. April 18, 2017).

Defendant’s “multifaceted” attack on the search warrant at issue fails because there is probable cause. United States v. Hollis, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58110 (W.D.Ky. April 17, 2017).*

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on CA2: Open container violation supports SI

CA2: Def’s attempted flight from a stop added to the RS

Officers were on a drug stakeout and saw the defendant watching the street, although there were no cars. He went in a building and came out with a plastic bag with a brick shaped object in the bottom. Officers tried to stop him and he kept going for 5-8 minutes. That heightened their reasonable suspicion. Seizure of defendant’s cell phones in the house without a warrant was reasonable in the murder for hire part of the case and there was no search of the cell phones without a search warrant. United States v. Babilonia, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6515 (2d Cir. April 17, 2017).

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Def’s attempted flight from a stop added to the RS

OH8: Being legally parked in a “high gang area” is not reasonable suspicion

Being legally parked in a “high gang area” is not reasonable suspicion. State v. Jackson, 2017-Ohio-1369, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 1420 (8th Dist. April 13, 2017).

Fake drugs were substituted for the real thing in a delivery to a house by carrier. The recipient left the house with the package, and that was reasonable suspicion and the package was in plain view in the car when it was stopped. United States v. Bully, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185944 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Being legally parked in a “high gang area” is not reasonable suspicion

D.P.R.: Just being a driver of vehicle doesn’t give standing; two traffic tickets in past in vehicle not enough

Defendant at the suppression hearing showed no possessory interest in the vehicle he claimed not to own at the time of the stop and search. Two traffic tickets in the past driving the same vehicle wasn’t enough. United States v. Morales-Torres, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57131 (D. P.R. March 14, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57809 (D.P.R. Apr. 13, 2017).

The search of defendant’s property was on reasonable suspicion of his using methamphetamine, and he and his father specifically consented to this search. United States v. Wolff, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187805 (D.N.D. March 18, 2015).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Just being a driver of vehicle doesn’t give standing; two traffic tickets in past in vehicle not enough

WaPo: D.C. appeals court poised to rule on whether police need warrants for cellphone tracking

WaPo: D.C. appeals court poised to rule on whether police need warrants for cellphone tracking by Tom Jackman:

Last year, a Maryland appeals court agreed and ruled that Baltimore police could not use evidence collected by a cell-site simulator in an attempted-murder case. On Tuesday, the District’s highest appeals court heard oral arguments on the Jones case and is ready to be the second appellate court in the nation to weigh in on whether capturing an individual’s cell signal is covered by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on WaPo: D.C. appeals court poised to rule on whether police need warrants for cellphone tracking

CO: Unconscious [and dead] drivers have consented to a blood draw

Unconscious drivers have consented to a blood draw by statute, and it’s constitutional. People v. Hyde, 2017 CO 24, 2017 Colo. LEXIS 282 (April 17, 2017); People v. Simpson, 2017 CO 25, 2017 Colo. LEXIS 283 (April 17, 2017); Fitzgerald v. People, 2017 CO 26, 2017 Colo. LEXIS 284 (April 17, 2017).

Statements from named theft victims on the totality gave probable cause to believe that defendant had stolen high grade wire worth over $200k at his home. As to a later consent search claim, the fact that none of that ended up in evidence is moot. Long v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 3350 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) April 18, 2017).*

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CO: Unconscious [and dead] drivers have consented to a blood draw