Three on consent

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress a search by consent where the consenter admitted during a pretrial deposition that she consented. Banks v. State, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 893 (April 20, 2017).*

Defendant’s father consented to the entry to arrest him and the police had probable cause. Therefore, his statement was correctly admitted. State v. Griffin, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 706 (La.App. 3 Cir. April 19, 2017).*

Defendant’s consent given after an entry assumed by the court to be unlawful that he didn’t know about was purged of any taint. State v. Barcus, 2017 N.H. LEXIS 43 (Feb. 15, 2017) .*

This entry was posted in Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.