D.Md.: While def’s statement is suppressed for a Miranda violation, he still consented to a search of his car during the suppressed statement

While defendant’s confession was suppressed for a Miranda violation, his consent to search was still valid because his will was not overborne. United States v. Woodland, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 319 (D. Md. Jan. 2, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Md.: While def’s statement is suppressed for a Miranda violation, he still consented to a search of his car during the suppressed statement

MN: Birchfield not retroactive

Application of Birchfield in Minnesota was determined to be procedural rather than substantive for purposes of retroactive effect. Johnson v. State, 2018 Minn. App. LEXIS 10 (Jan. 2, 2018).

Defendant’s detention was with reasonable suspicion. “Considering the totality of the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing in the light most favorable to the Government-including the blood-covered scene at the salon, witness observations, Mendoza-Torrecialls’s and Rea’s proximity to the crime scene, the absence of anyone else in the vicinity, and Rea’s bloodied appearance-we conclude that the facts known to police at the moment they encountered Mendoza-Torrecialls sufficed to give rise to a fair probability that he had engaged in criminal activity.” United States v. Mendoza-Torrecialls, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 36 (5th Cir. Jan. 2, 2018).*

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: Birchfield not retroactive

CA5: Forgoing license check not unreasonable under Rodriguez where investigation is proceeding apace

“Burcham’s argument based on Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 1609 (2015), is unavailing. Rodriguez is distinguishable; the district court did not err in finding that Jenkins’s decision to extend the stop was justified by additional reasonable suspicion developed from Burcham’s responses to traffic-related questions. See United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 508-09 (5th Cir. 2004) (en banc). [¶] Jenkins also did not violate Rodriguez by forgoing a check on Burcham’s driver’s license and vehicle registration. See Brigham, 382 F.3d at 511. Nothing in Rodriguez requires an officer to perform such checks; the Supreme Court merely recognized that the Fourth Amendment tolerated the checks as incident to an officer’s traffic mission. See Rodriguez, 135 S.Ct. at 1614-15.” Defendant validly consented to a search. United States v. Burcham, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 21 (5th Cir. Jan. 2, 2018).

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5: Forgoing license check not unreasonable under Rodriguez where investigation is proceeding apace

OH8: Drug dog on scene while ticket being written caused no additional detention

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion based on corroborated informant hearsay. “Because the police were still in the process of writing the traffic ticket when the canine arrived and conducted the sniff, and thus the stop was not unlawfully extended.” State v. White, 2018-Ohio-18, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 3 (4th Dist. Jan. 2, 2018).

There is obviously no reasonable expectation of privacy in a jail surveillance video of a hallway where defendant assaulted a guard on video. Roemisch v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 12112 (Tex. App. – Eastland Dec 29, 2017) (why would anybody think there’s privacy in a jail hallway?).

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH8: Drug dog on scene while ticket being written caused no additional detention

MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants

MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants by Toni McAllister:
Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants

D.D.C.: Suppressed evidence [a confession] leads to grant of pretrial release

The question of the effect of suppressed evidence on the question of bail is considered at length in United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205 (D.D.C. Jan. 2, 2018), albeit here in a suppressed confession. The court concludes that the weight of the government’s case is iffy-er and, thus, the risk of flight is reduced. Therefore, defendant gets release.
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Suppressed evidence [a confession] leads to grant of pretrial release

CA8: Denying any knowledge of a car or its contents is abandonment of a cell phone found inside it; cell phones subject to abandonment

Defendant was believed connected to a shooting involving a Buick. He was taken back to the Buick after arrest, and he denied all knowledge of the Buick. Inside was found a cell phone that the police seized and obtained a warrant for, and pictures were found of defendant with a firearm similar to the one used in the shooting. He abandoned the cell phone by disclaiming any interest in the Buick. The validity of the search warrant is thus moot. The court rejects the argument that cell phones can’t be abandoned. United States v. Crumble, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 14 (8th Cir. Jan. 2, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA8: Denying any knowledge of a car or its contents is abandonment of a cell phone found inside it; cell phones subject to abandonment

W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

The court finds defendant consented to a search of his bag on a bus by a shrug of his shoulders. United States v. Salas-Lopez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212709 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 16, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212286 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 28, 2017).

“The specificity of the vehicle description, the reference to seizure of drug proceeds, and the attestations of a nexus between the vehicle and drug proceeds lead us to conclude the constitutional particularity requirement was satisfied.” State v. Ford, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 1264 (Dec. 20, 2017).*

AFOSI CI’s controlled buy from defendant was probable cause for issuance of a search warrant for his house. The CI went to defendant’s house and made the buy. People v. Gallo, 2017 Guam 24, 2017 Guam LEXIS 23 (Dec. 29, 2017).*

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas versions of Search and Seizure

Want to write a version of Search and Seizure for your state? Have two years to spend on advancing your own knowledge of the subject? Lexis plans state specific versions of Search and Seizure for these states. Email the author and we’ll forward your name to Lexis to contact you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas versions of Search and Seizure

AP: “Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine” because a drug dog said it was cocaine

AP: Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine:

OVIEDO, Fla. (AP) — A Florida man spent 90 days in jail after police officers who stopped him for driving without headlights said white powder found in his car was cocaine.

Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on AP: “Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine” because a drug dog said it was cocaine

KS declines to decide whether odor of MJ on the person is PC because here there was more than just that

Defendant didn’t dim headlights and officers stopped the car suspecting inattentive driving. The smell of marijuana coming from the car was obvious. “We decline the State’s offer to embark on a new legal proposition that would allow Kansas law enforcement officers to search a person simply because there was an odor of marijuana about that person.” There was inattentive driver in addition to just smell from the car and the person. State v. Hadley, 2017 Kan. App. LEXIS 91 (Dec. 22, 2017).

Defendant doesn’t show in his 2255 how filing a motion to suppress would have aided his defense because there was no conceivable ground on which it would have succeeded. United States v. Zamudio-Beltran, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192265 (D. N.M. May 12, 2016).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on KS declines to decide whether odor of MJ on the person is PC because here there was more than just that

OH3: Narc told patrol officer def was drug suspect, and patrol officer ran DL and found it was suspended; stop valid despite pretext claim

A patrol officer was told that defendant was a drug suspect. He was told because he had stopped defendant before and was familiar with him. He ran defendant’s name through the state computer and it showed that defendant had no valid DL. When he happened upon defendant going about his shift, he stopped the car. The stop had a factual basis, and the pretext did not make the stop unreasonable. “In this case, Bethel did not make a random traffic stop. Rather, Bethel had probable cause to believe that McDonald was committing a traffic violation because, at the time of the traffic stop, Bethel had actual knowledge that McDonald was operating a motor vehicle without a valid driver’s license.” State v. McDonald, 2017-Ohio-9250, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 5727 (3d Dist. Dec. 26, 2017).

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH3: Narc told patrol officer def was drug suspect, and patrol officer ran DL and found it was suspended; stop valid despite pretext claim

OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

Defendant was initially stopped with information from a CI amounting to reasonable suspicion that he was purchasing precursors and ingredients to manufacture methamphetamine. When the police got to his house, it was apparent there was a working meth lab, and that’s exigency. State v. Freeders, 2017-Ohio-9278, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 5745 (5th Dist. Dec. 26, 2017).

“A reliable confidential informant personally made two controlled buys, and this information was verified by the police who supervised the buys ….” That’s probable cause. People v. Clemente, 2017 NY Slip Op 09235, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9311 (1st Dept. Dec. 28, 2017).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

MI: Electric company’s use of smart meters is not state action for 4A purposes

The electric company’s decision to install smart meters is not a Fourth Amendment issue because the company is a private actor. In re Consumers Energy Co., 2017 Mich. App. LEXIS 2161 (Oct. 10, 2017, published Dec. 28, 2017).

The state trial court may have misidentified the search and seizure issue, but the court of appeals did not, and defendant thus had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the Fourth Amendment claim in state court. Haakenstad v. Symdon, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212933 (W.D. Wis. Dec. 29, 2017).*

Posted in Private search, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MI: Electric company’s use of smart meters is not state action for 4A purposes

There are six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

Six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on There are six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

NYTimes: The Failed War on Drugs

NYTimes: The Failed War on Drugs by George P. Shultz and Pedro Aspe:
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: The Failed War on Drugs

Book on sale through midnight PT Jan. 2

Enter NEW2018 at checkout or Call 800.223.1940

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Book on sale through midnight PT Jan. 2

Today is [or maybe] the 414th anniversay of Semayne’s Case and judicial recognition of knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine

Today (as best as can be determined) is the 414th anniversary of Semayne’s Case recognizing both knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine at common law. Back then, the dates of decisions weren’t as important and they appeared in reporters well after the fact. The date has been given as 1603 and 1604. Consensus seems to be January 1, 1604.
Continue reading →

Posted in Common law, Knock and announce, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Today is [or maybe] the 414th anniversay of Semayne’s Case and judicial recognition of knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine

OH6: Warrantless blood draw from believed to be dying motorcyclist valid

A warrantless blood draw from defendant was reasonable where, at the scene of his motorcycle accident on I-75 hitting the rear of a car when it was travelling approximately 102 in a 65 and killing his passenger throwing her 450′ beyond where the motorcycle stopped, the officers came upon defendant and thought he was going to bleed out and die before help arrived. He was unconscious and unresponsive, his face was torn off, and he was only making gurgling noises. He was no better at the ER. State v. Speelman, 2017-Ohio-9306, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 5777 (6th Dist. Dec. 29, 2017).

Defendant has no standing to claim a tracking device was improperly placed in a package shipped to his address where he did not claim any interest in the package. United States v. Ruffin, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213253 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 29, 2017).*

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on OH6: Warrantless blood draw from believed to be dying motorcyclist valid

IN: DRE exam requires warning of right to counsel under state const.

The Indiana Constitution recognizes a right to warning that counsel may be consulted of a person in custody before a consent search is sought in Pirtle v. State, 323 N.E.2d 634 (Ind. 1975). That has been held not to apply to FSTs or PBTs because they are so short in duration. A DRE, however, takes 30 minutes, so Pirtle applies. Dycus v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 887 (Dec. 29, 2017).

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: DRE exam requires warning of right to counsel under state const.