OH8: Drug dog on scene while ticket being written caused no additional detention

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion based on corroborated informant hearsay. “Because the police were still in the process of writing the traffic ticket when the canine arrived and conducted the sniff, and thus the stop was not unlawfully extended.” State v. White, 2018-Ohio-18, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 3 (4th Dist. Jan. 2, 2018).

There is obviously no reasonable expectation of privacy in a jail surveillance video of a hallway where defendant assaulted a guard on video. Roemisch v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 12112 (Tex. App. – Eastland Dec 29, 2017) (why would anybody think there’s privacy in a jail hallway?).

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.