Monthly Archives: December 2021

HI: “[T]he gravity of the crime standing alone cannot establish exigent circumstances” for warrantless entry

Defendant’s unprovoked attack in stabbing a woman on a beach and then fleeing to his home wasn’t exigent by the time the police got there. “[T]he gravity of the crime standing alone cannot establish exigent circumstances.” State v. Willis, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit | Comments Off on HI: “[T]he gravity of the crime standing alone cannot establish exigent circumstances” for warrantless entry

W.D.Wash.: Carpenter does not apply to private searches

Carpenter does not apply to private searches, citing United States v. Miller, 982 F.3d 412, 431 (6th Cir. 2020), and United States v. Ringland, 966 F.3d 731, 737 (8th Cir. 2020). Kleiser v. Chavez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232013 (W.D.Wash. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Private search | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Carpenter does not apply to private searches

CA6: Failure to object to co-occupant’s apparent consent supported consent

An occupant of defendant’s house with apparent authority consented to an entry. When the officers expressed an interest in defendant’s cell phone, he didn’t voice any concerns. “He maintains that the male occupant’s invitation to the officers to enter Mason’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Failure to object to co-occupant’s apparent consent supported consent

WaPo: You’re not paranoid to cover your webcam. But the cameras you can’t cover are scarier.

WaPo: You’re not paranoid to cover your webcam. But the cameras you can’t cover are scarier. by Tatum Hunter:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: You’re not paranoid to cover your webcam. But the cameras you can’t cover are scarier.

N.D.Cal.: Rule 41(g) is for return of things, not suppression of evidence

Rule 41(g) is only for return of seized things, and it can’t be used to suppress evidence, especially in a state court. Christie v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231113 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 2, 2021). Defendant’s motion to suppress cites … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, State constitution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Rule 41(g) is for return of things, not suppression of evidence

D.Ariz.: Covid-19 testing is (essentially) so minimal it is not a 4A intrusion

“Nasal swab testing for COVID-19 does not create an intrusion under the skin, does not involve any genetic testing, and there is no use of the sample for law enforcement purposes. Accordingly, the Court finds that Gold is unlikely to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Search | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Covid-19 testing is (essentially) so minimal it is not a 4A intrusion

SC: Officers obtained text messages in murder case with emergency request

The state’s obtaining CSLI here is not suppressed. Officers worked backwards from the murder victim’s cell phone and an emergency request for text messages and got them and linked them to defendant. It was inevitable that defendant’s CSLI would be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on SC: Officers obtained text messages in murder case with emergency request

D.Colo.: A shared driveway is not curtilage

A shared driveway is not curtilage. United States v. Vasquez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230603 (D.Colo. Dec. 2, 2021). 2254 petitioner admits that he had a full and fair opportunity to litigate his search issue and did. The fact he … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Colo.: A shared driveway is not curtilage

MO: Even if 4A IAC, no prejudice

Even if defense counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress files found on his computer that corroborated his child rape victim, he can’t show prejudice because of other exhibits in evidence which were incontestable. The post-conviction court erred in … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on MO: Even if 4A IAC, no prejudice

N.D.Iowa: Referring to social media posts as “open source” when friending is required isn’t materially false

It was not a Franks violation to refer to defendant’s social media posts as “open source” when defendant limited it to only “friends.” United States v. Smith, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230826 (N.D.Iowa Dec. 2, 2021), adopting 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Referring to social media posts as “open source” when friending is required isn’t materially false

N.D.Tex.: RS from various admissions, and wearing a t-shirt with Pablo Escobar on it

Reasonable suspicion here from, inter alia, conflicting travel plans, admitting heading to South Carolina for further instructions from an unknown person [dumb], and having on a t-shirt with Pablo Escobar on it. United States v. Lopez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: RS from various admissions, and wearing a t-shirt with Pablo Escobar on it

N.D.Ga.: Failure to record videoconference SW application under state law not 4A violation

Georgia has allowed video conferencing search warrant application for years. The statute requires a recording, but the federal courts have never held that a failure to record violates the Fourth Amendment when a state search warrant ends up in federal … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Failure to record videoconference SW application under state law not 4A violation

S.D.N.Y.: Warrant overbreadth claim fails because of PC and GFE

“Suppression of digital photographs, videos and bank records that fell outside the April 1, 2019 through October 25, 2019 timeframe seized from the Subject Device is not warranted, as the December 2020 Warrant was sufficiently particularized and not overbroad.” On … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Warrant overbreadth claim fails because of PC and GFE

CA8: Child porn knock-and-talk leads to valid exigency-based warrantless entry

This case started with a knock-and-talk about defendant visiting websites involving commercial sex acts with children. “While talking with William Meyer outside his home, federal agents grew worried that, if he went back inside, he would destroy evidence. Rather than … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Child porn knock-and-talk leads to valid exigency-based warrantless entry

OH4: Failure to corroborate CI was a complete failure of PC, so no GFE either

The affidavit for search warrant here failed to show probable cause at all. It relied on informant hearsay from an identified informant. The trial court erroneously concluded that an identified informant didn’t have to be corroborated. In addition, probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH4: Failure to corroborate CI was a complete failure of PC, so no GFE either

D.Utah: In IAC claims, how did the failure to move to suppress affect the decision to plead?

Defendant’s 2255 doesn’t show that the failure to move to suppress a silencer was unreasonable or would have even been successful. How did the failure to move to suppress affect the decision to plead? Seamster v. United States, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Utah: In IAC claims, how did the failure to move to suppress affect the decision to plead?

DE: Officer’s use of fictitious “friend” account didn’t violate REP in Facebook account

The officer violated no reasonable expectation of privacy of defendant by creating a fictitious Facebook account and then getting “friended” by defendant. Then on defendant’s Facebook account, the officer saw that defendant parolee had firearms. That led to a valid … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Social media warrants | Comments Off on DE: Officer’s use of fictitious “friend” account didn’t violate REP in Facebook account

M.D.Fla.: 4A doesn’t apply to foreign citizens in their own country, even if U.S. arranges the arrest

“Cifuentes-Cuero also argues that the manner in which the United States government brought him into this country, by using ‘falsification [and] unconscionable action[s]’ violated his due process rights and divested the Court of jurisdiction. (Doc. # 1-1 at 14-19). Cifuentes-Cuero … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: 4A doesn’t apply to foreign citizens in their own country, even if U.S. arranges the arrest

D.Minn.: Nexus shown for Facebook account SW

“[T]he totality of the circumstances described in the search warrant affidavit establishes the requisite nexus between Kyle Clark’s Facebook account and evidence of suspected drug-trafficking activities.” United States v. Clark, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229926 (D.Minn. Dec. 1, 2021).* The … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Nexus shown for Facebook account SW

S.D.N.Y.: There was RS for defendant’s 1989 detention where he’s now indicted for murder related to it

Defendant is recently charged with a murder in aid of a drug transaction from 1989. The officers had reasonable suspicion for the encounter. United States v. Merced, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229659 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)*:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: There was RS for defendant’s 1989 detention where he’s now indicted for murder related to it