Monthly Archives: March 2021

CA5: 4A generally only applies to pretrial govt activities

The Fourth Amendment only applies to pretrial alleged constitutional deprivations. Trial related constraints are not Fourth Amendment issues. United States v. Emakoji, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6843 (5th Cir. Mar. 9, 2021):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: 4A generally only applies to pretrial govt activities

Forbes: Drones With ‘Most Advanced AI Ever’ Coming Soon To Your Local Police Department

Forbes: Drones With ‘Most Advanced AI Ever’ Coming Soon To Your Local Police Department by Thomas Brewster (“Founded by Google veterans and backed by $340 million from major VCs, Skydio is creating drones that seem straight out of science fiction—and … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Forbes: Drones With ‘Most Advanced AI Ever’ Coming Soon To Your Local Police Department

CA5 declines to extend Bivens to 4A claims outside the home

Court declines to extend Bivens to a search in parking lot because it thinks SCOTUS would agree. Bivens was a search of the home. Byrd v. Lamb, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6844 (5th Cir. Mar. 9, 2021). “Henriquez-Perez has not … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA5 declines to extend Bivens to 4A claims outside the home

WA: Uncorroborated CI’s story not RS or PC

CI was not shown to be sufficiently reliable by an attempt to corroborate her to justify defendant’s stop and subsequent search. “Unlike a citizen informant calling 911, a criminal informant is not presumed to be acting out of civic responsibility. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on WA: Uncorroborated CI’s story not RS or PC

WY: Mere citation to state constitution without cogent argument for different treatment is waiver

Citation alone to the state constitution’s search and seizure without cogent argument for differentiating Fourth Amendment cases is waiver. The totality of information before the officer in the traffic stop justified it. Elmore v. State, 2021 Wyo. LEXIS 48 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, State constitution | Comments Off on WY: Mere citation to state constitution without cogent argument for different treatment is waiver

CA5: Warrantless entry to seize suicidal ptf was reasonable

The officer’s warrantless entry to seize the allegedly suicidal plaintiff was based on probable ause and exigency. “The exigency of a credible risk that a person is about to end their life justifies the warrantless entries into Clark’s hotel room … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Warrantless entry to seize suicidal ptf was reasonable

CA5: Police accidentally shooting a hostage isn’t an intentional seizure

“Here, the only plausible reading of the allegations is that Doe accidentally shot Ulises while trying to help him by ending the hostage situation. Such accidental conduct does not result in a Fourth Amendment seizure. See Brower, 489 U.S. at … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Police accidentally shooting a hostage isn’t an intentional seizure

D.Conn.: When govt raises an exception to warrant requirement, def must rebut in briefing, but cell phone seizure shown unjustified

In response to defendant’s motion to suppress, the government argued search incident, which the defense didn’t rebut in the papers. Motion denied in part. Defendant’s cell phone seizure is suppressed, however, because the government didn’t show justification for its seizure. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Overseizure, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Conn.: When govt raises an exception to warrant requirement, def must rebut in briefing, but cell phone seizure shown unjustified

Cal.2: Litigating a motion to suppress with an affidavit sealed in part from the defense

People v. Washington, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 196 (2d Dist. Mar. 9, 2021):

Posted in Informant hearsay, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on Cal.2: Litigating a motion to suppress with an affidavit sealed in part from the defense

WaPo: Massive camera hack exposes the growing reach and intimacy of American surveillance

WaPo: Massive camera hack exposes the growing reach and intimacy of American surveillance by Drew Harwell (“A breach of the camera start-up Verkada ‘should be a wake-up call to the dangers of self-surveillance,’ one expert said: ‘Our desire for some … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Massive camera hack exposes the growing reach and intimacy of American surveillance

CA10: Successor habeas denied on claim state judges denied 4A claims because they were racist

2254 petitioner’s claim the state courts failed to adequately consider his Fourth Amendment claim because they were racist was still barred as a successive habeas. White v. Crow, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6769 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2021):

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Successor habeas denied on claim state judges denied 4A claims because they were racist

EFF: App Stores Have Kicked Out Some Location Data Brokers. Good, Now Kick Them All Out.

EFF: App Stores Have Kicked Out Some Location Data Brokers. Good, Now Kick Them All Out. by Bennett Cyphers:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: App Stores Have Kicked Out Some Location Data Brokers. Good, Now Kick Them All Out.

OH11: Driver being passed out behind the steering wheel with the engine running is RS

The driver being passed out behind the steering wheel with the engine running and radio playing is reasonable suspicion. State v. Cassel, 2021-Ohio-661, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 654 (11th Dist. Mar. 8, 2021).* Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Pretext | Comments Off on OH11: Driver being passed out behind the steering wheel with the engine running is RS

VICE: Dashcam Video Shows a State Trooper Ordering His Dog to Bite Man for Nearly 4 Minutes

VICE: Dashcam Video Shows a State Trooper Ordering His Dog to Bite Man for Nearly 4 Minutes by Trone Dowd (“After an investigation, Parker Surbrook has been charged with felony assault.”)

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on VICE: Dashcam Video Shows a State Trooper Ordering His Dog to Bite Man for Nearly 4 Minutes

CO: POs reasonably believed def parolee consented to broad search of apt, including boyfriend’s stuff

Defendant’s girlfriend was on parole, and the parole officers came to the house for a search. The parole officers reasonably believed that she had apparent authority to consent to a search of the premises. She believed she was moving there, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CO: POs reasonably believed def parolee consented to broad search of apt, including boyfriend’s stuff

OH5: Def didn’t abandon cell phone but it was still reasonable for officer to turn it on to see if he could ID owner

Defendant did not abandon his cell phone by leaving it charging in a vehicle (actually, it had fallen out but the charging cable was attached) where he was away from it. However, the officer reasonably could turn on the phone … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH5: Def didn’t abandon cell phone but it was still reasonable for officer to turn it on to see if he could ID owner

D.D.C.: 6A, due process, and F.R.Crim.P. 43 don’t mandate in person 4A suppression hearings during Covid

The court prefers to hold suppression hearings in person because, in many cases, it is the most important pretrial proceeding. But, while a suppression hearing is a critical stage where the right to effective assistance of counsel has attached, the … Continue reading

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: 6A, due process, and F.R.Crim.P. 43 don’t mandate in person 4A suppression hearings during Covid

CA6: No suppression remedy for no-knock violation

The remedy for a no-knock violation is not suppression of the evidence—it’s a § 1983 action for violating the Fourth Amendment. Moreover, “An issuing judge need not eliminate every alternative explanation to find a ‘fair probability’ that contraband will be … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: No suppression remedy for no-knock violation

CA9: Violent take down of traffic detainee not resisting could be found excessive; no QI

Qualified immunity is denied officers for excessive force in a violent take down on a passively resisting plaintiff in a traffic stop without there being any exigency justifying it. “Viewing the facts, as we must, in the light most favorable … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Violent take down of traffic detainee not resisting could be found excessive; no QI

CA5: District court’s failure to credit def’s claim of possessory interest in car is affirmed

Defendant was a passenger in a car in which he claimed he had a possessory interest because it belonged to his domestic partner and he claimed to have paid $2000 toward the car. The district court didn’t credit that testimony … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: District court’s failure to credit def’s claim of possessory interest in car is affirmed