Monthly Archives: March 2021

N.D.Okla.: Failure to pay arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A

A failure to pay arrest warrant issued on probable cause doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment because that’s only to start the process, not end it. Graff v. Aberdeen II, Inc., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46760 (N.D. Okla. Mar. 12, 2021):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Failure to pay arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A

OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

Defendant was searched and arrested for a concealed weapon. That did not prohibit the officers from further searching his personal effects in his clothes. State v. Zepernick, 2021-Ohio-719, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 724 (7th Dist. Mar. 4, 2021). 2254 petitioner’s … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

Defendant prevails in his Franks challenge. The police withheld that defendant was at worst a suspect in personal use of marijuana, but made it look like he was a trafficker when they had no evidence of it. That means that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

OR: Entry onto curtilage to closely examine car for evidence of hit-and-run exceed implied consent of entry

After a hit-and-run accident, police took a bumper part left at the scene. They ultimately located the probable car at defendant’s house. The police, as any other visitor, had implied authority to enter the curtilage but not to look at … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OR: Entry onto curtilage to closely examine car for evidence of hit-and-run exceed implied consent of entry

M.D.Ala.: Some force inheres in any arrest; de minimus force is reasonable

Some amount of force occurs in any arrest. The question is unreasonableness. “Garrett’s conclusory allegation regarding Williams’s specific actions establishes no more than the use of de minimis force by Williams, which does not constitute a Fourth Amendment violation.” Garrett … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Some force inheres in any arrest; de minimus force is reasonable

CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

The protective sweep finding defendant’s guns on execution of his arrest warrant was reasonable. Defendant does not show that the officers intentionally delayed his arrest with the purpose of exploiting a protective sweep. United States v. Cammon, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

NE: Police have no const’l duty to fully interrogate a citizen informant

A citizen informant told police of a motorist that might need assistance, and that led to defendant’s arrest. There is no constitutional requirement for police to interrogate the citizen informant. State v. Montoya, 29 Neb. App. 563, 2021 Neb. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk | Comments Off on NE: Police have no const’l duty to fully interrogate a citizen informant

CA7: Claim of lack of PC for arrest not insulated from later review by a judicial finding of PC for trial

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim they were arrested without probable cause survives the state trial court finding enough to hold them for trial. “The Supreme Court held that a Fourth Amendment theory based on lack of probable cause survives a judicial … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Claim of lack of PC for arrest not insulated from later review by a judicial finding of PC for trial

GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

Failure to object on Fourth Amendment grounds at the agency level before the zoning board in a zoning administrative case was waiver for appeal. Forsyth County v. Mommies Props. LLC, 2021 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Mar. 11, 2021). “The first … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

FL1: Sheriff’s Office failed to show TV and PlayStation were lawfully seized during drug search

The Bay County SO executed a drug search warrant at claimant’s father’s house and seized a flat screen TV and PlayStation. Claimant sought return, and the state claimed it was lawfully taken and became county property by operation of law. … Continue reading

Posted in Overseizure, Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on FL1: Sheriff’s Office failed to show TV and PlayStation were lawfully seized during drug search

W.D.Mo.: Govt moots motion to suppress by deciding not to use challenged evidence

When the defendant files a motion to suppress and the government elects not to use the evidence at trial, the motion becomes moot. United States v. Bowers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45445 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 11, 2021). Defendant’s 2255 for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Govt moots motion to suppress by deciding not to use challenged evidence

TX13: State showed exigency for BAC without SW because it would have taken one of two officers off-duty

The state showed exigency in not getting a search warrant for defendant’s BAC after a serious car crash left him unconscious. It would have taken hours to get the warrant back then [2013] and it would have taken one of … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX13: State showed exigency for BAC without SW because it would have taken one of two officers off-duty

C.D.Ill.: Prison strip searches are always permitted, unless done unreasonably

Inmates seen naked in prison is not a constitutional claim unless it was all done in an unreasonable manner. The limited facts here fail to show that. Danuk v. Downey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45383 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 11, 2021):

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Prison strip searches are always permitted, unless done unreasonably

E.D.Pa.: Just because defense counsel finds an omitted fact interesting doesn’t make it “material”; not all facts need be included

The 121 page affidavit for search warrant for evidence of drug trafficking was neither stale nor lacked nexus. Defendant’s Franks challenge also fails for lack of a substantial preliminary showing. United States v. Briggs, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44653 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Just because defense counsel finds an omitted fact interesting doesn’t make it “material”; not all facts need be included

CA11: Encounter was consensual; race of occupants of car never a valid concern

The court finds that the police-citizen encounter here was consensual, so the question of reasonable suspicion doesn’t have to be decided. The race of the occupants is never a concern in consent. United States v. Knights, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Encounter was consensual; race of occupants of car never a valid concern

CA11: Immediate response to gunshot report justified warrantless entry

Nearby officers heard a gunshot and they arrived to locate the cause and source. “[T]the emergency doctrine justified the warrantless search. The officers had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that there was an immediate need to protect themselves and … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA11: Immediate response to gunshot report justified warrantless entry

CA9: DV victim, def’s wife, consented to search for firearms

Defendant’s wife called the police as a domestic violence victim, and she was found to have consented to a search of their garage and gun safe. She was emotional, considering what she’d been through, but consent wasn’t involuntary. She was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: DV victim, def’s wife, consented to search for firearms

D.Conn.: Stripped down and strapped to bed in prison states 4A claim

In PLRA screening over a jail strip search and leaving plaintiff naked strapped down to his bed, “[t]he Court cannot discern a legitimate justification for leaving Smith in four-point restraints without a gown or a blanket to cover his naked … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Stripped down and strapped to bed in prison states 4A claim

CA11: Tasing grand mal seizure sufferer held down by four men was excessive on its face; no QI

The officer’s repeated Tasings of the teenager who was suffering a grand mal seizure amounted to excessive force. The district court properly denied qualified immunity, because the constitutional violation was clearly established based on both materially similar case law and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Tasing grand mal seizure sufferer held down by four men was excessive on its face; no QI

D.Me.: Even a perjury claim about state court search testimony doesn’t get over Stone bar

2254 petitioner’s claim that the search and seizure testimony in state court was based on perjury still doesn’t get him over Stone v. Powell. Wilson v. Maine, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44260 (D. Me. Mar. 10, 2021). A § 1983 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Even a perjury claim about state court search testimony doesn’t get over Stone bar