Monthly Archives: October 2019

OH5: It was reasonable to run the dog around a car in a traffic stop where it happened without extending the stop during waiting time

The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress where the officer ran the dog around the car within the time of the normal traffic stop. Therefore, the traffic stop was not illegally extended because the purpose … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: It was reasonable to run the dog around a car in a traffic stop where it happened without extending the stop during waiting time

WaPo: Feds to experiment with allowing police officers to wear body cameras on task forces

WaPo: Feds to experiment with allowing police officers to wear body cameras on task forces (“Police chiefs wanted cameras, but no federal agencies wear them. A pilot program will allow cameras during operations in some cities.”)

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: Feds to experiment with allowing police officers to wear body cameras on task forces

IN: SW obtained off of lost drone video wasn’t stale when it was only about four days

A lady found a drone in her yard, and she was already concerned about people flying drones over her house. A computer memory card was in the drone. She looked at it, and called the police and turned it over. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: SW obtained off of lost drone video wasn’t stale when it was only about four days

CA9: Even if there was a Miranda violation, SW still valid

“Because no Miranda violation occurred, the police permissibly relied on Terui’s incriminating statements in obtaining the search warrant for his home. Even if a Miranda violation had occurred, however, suppression of the evidence found pursuant to the warrant would not … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA9: Even if there was a Miranda violation, SW still valid

CA4: The officer knew def had a gun before def’s alleged involuntary confession

The government proved inevitable discovery. “The record makes clear that before Alston made any involuntary admissions, Captain Aleem believed that Alston possessed a gun, had the probable cause necessary to search the car, and intended to find the gun. The … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA4: The officer knew def had a gun before def’s alleged involuntary confession

CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

State DHS case workers are subject to the Fourth Amendment, and their warrantless entry into defendant’s home was unreasonable. People v. Dyer, 2019 COA 161, 2019 Colo. App. LEXIS 1588 (Oct. 24, 2019). Probable cause for search of a car … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

W.D.Va.: Arrest warrant didn’t have to be in hand at time of arrest

When defendant was arrested on an arrest warrant, it was constitutionally required that officers have the warrant in hand at the time of the arrest. Rule 4 only requires the warrant be shown as soon as practical. Defendant was arrested … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Arrest warrant didn’t have to be in hand at time of arrest

IA: Failure to get ruling on state constitutional claim was waiver

Defendant barely raised the state constitutional claim below and why it should be different than the Fourth Amendment claim and in her briefing, but the issue was not decided below so it wasn’t preserved for review. State v. Lasley-Eakins, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Failure to get ruling on state constitutional claim was waiver

NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

The small town police department that obtained the search warrant did not have its own entry team for safety. Using officers from other county and state agencies to assist didn’t violate the warrant. People v. Ward, 2019 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

GA: Passenger’s small quantity of MJ in purse isn’t PC for car

A small amount of marijuana in defendant’s passenger’s purse wasn’t probable cause to search the entire car. Lowe v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 588 (Oct. 23, 2019). A combat veteran with perceived grievances against the police and a prior … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: Passenger’s small quantity of MJ in purse isn’t PC for car

IL: Two anonymous calls of man with a gun resulted in finding only def in the area who walked like he was holding

The frisk of defendant did not violate the Fourth Amendment, so the trial court did not err by denying defendant’s motion to suppress the firearm. The officer encountered defendant after an unknown caller placed two 911 calls, defendant matched the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Two anonymous calls of man with a gun resulted in finding only def in the area who walked like he was holding

E.D.Ky.: Paraphrasing def’s jail calls on hearsay without affiant actually listening to them isn’t a Franks violation

A full forensic search of defendant’s cell phone was authorized by the affidavit which was attached to the search warrant. There were admissions from the defendant on jail calls to others that were reported to the police. The paraphrasing the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Paraphrasing def’s jail calls on hearsay without affiant actually listening to them isn’t a Franks violation

MO: Def’s blood draw while he was unconscious was proper under Mitchell

Defendant was unconscious after a single car accident and he smelled of alcohol. There was probable cause and the blood draw did not violate the Fourth Amendment under Mitchell v. Wisconsin. State v. Gray, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 1671 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on MO: Def’s blood draw while he was unconscious was proper under Mitchell

S.D.Ga.: Def was a passenger in a car and his cell phone was seized and subjected to search with a warrant; the seizure was lawful

Defendant challenged only the seizure of his cell phone from a car he was a passenger in, and not its later search with a warrant. The search warrant makes all the difference, even assuming he had standing, which he likely … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Def was a passenger in a car and his cell phone was seized and subjected to search with a warrant; the seizure was lawful

CA7: PC to arrest doesn’t usually go stale

Probable cause to arrest doesn’t go stale like probable cause to search does. “Haldorson’s primary contention is that the information from the controlled buy was too stale three weeks later to support probable cause for an arrest. The mere passage … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness | Comments Off on CA7: PC to arrest doesn’t usually go stale

N.D.Fla.: Def’s coming to door and at threshold made him capable of being arrested without police entering home

When defendant came to the door and answered the officers’ knock, and moved into the threshold when they said they were “security forces,” he was subject to arrest right there without the officers violating the privacy of the home. They … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Def’s coming to door and at threshold made him capable of being arrested without police entering home

NYTimes: You Got a Brain Scan at the Hospital. Someday a Computer May Use It to Identify You.NYTimes: You Got a Brain Scan at the Hospital. Someday a Computer May Use It to Identify You.

NYTimes: You Got a Brain Scan at the Hospital. Someday a Computer May Use It to Identify You. By Gina Kolata (“In a disturbing experiment, imaging and facial recognition technologies were used to match research subjects to their M.R.I. scans.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: You Got a Brain Scan at the Hospital. Someday a Computer May Use It to Identify You.NYTimes: You Got a Brain Scan at the Hospital. Someday a Computer May Use It to Identify You.

Law.com: Commentary: The Privacy Revolution Has Arrived (in the US)

Law.com: Commentary: The Privacy Revolution Has Arrived (in the US) (“While the European Economic Area, including the European Union, has led the modern privacy revolution, specifically by enacting and enforcing the groundbreaking General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the protection of … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Law.com: Commentary: The Privacy Revolution Has Arrived (in the US)

NYLJ: Analysis: Warrant-Proof Encryption and Lawful Decryption

NYLJ: Analysis: Warrant-Proof Encryption and Lawful Decryption (“In his Cyber Crime column, Peter A. Crusco addresses the legal landscape surrounding the question of what legal options are available for decrypting an electronic device that has been seized via a lawful … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYLJ: Analysis: Warrant-Proof Encryption and Lawful Decryption

CA7: Police officers who obtained def’s blood work from a hospital under an Indiana statute didn’t violate the 4A

Plaintiff sued under § 1983 because police got his blood work from the hospital albeit under Indiana statute. “We turn next to Stewart’s Fourth Amendment claim. The district court entered summary judgment for the defendant police officers on the basis … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Police officers who obtained def’s blood work from a hospital under an Indiana statute didn’t violate the 4A