Monthly Archives: August 2018

OK: Trial court’s granting motion to suppress without even considering GFE on state’s request was an abuse of discretion

The trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion to suppress the search warrant without even considering the good faith exception after the state raised it. State v. Haliburton, 2018 OK CR 28, 2018 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OK: Trial court’s granting motion to suppress without even considering GFE on state’s request was an abuse of discretion

CA9: No justification for probation search of locked bedroom of non-probationer roommate brother

Defendant lived with his brother who was on probation in a locked room. Officers came to conduct a probation search of the brother, and it was unreasonable to search defendant’s locked room. They had no reason to believe the brother … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: No justification for probation search of locked bedroom of non-probationer roommate brother

NPR: The Pot Breathalyzer Is Here. Maybe

NPR: The Pot Breathalyzer Is Here. Maybe by Eric Westervelt: As legalization of recreational and medical marijuana continues to expand, police across the country are more concerned than ever about stoned drivers taking to the nation’s roads and freeways, endangering … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NPR: The Pot Breathalyzer Is Here. Maybe

NYLJ: Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: ‘Carpenter’ Nails It

NYLJ: Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: ‘Carpenter’ Nails It: “In his column on Criminal Law and Procedure, Barry Kamins analyzes ‘Carpernter v. U.S.,’ a landmark decision significantly affecting digital privacy.”

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NYLJ: Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: ‘Carpenter’ Nails It

E.D.Ky.: Carpenter doesn’t apply to CSLI gathered 17 months before under GFE

In January 2017, defendant was in a car where the driver was arrested, and he was detained too. Calls were made from their cell phones to tell the codefendant’s father to “clean out” the house before a search warrant arrived. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Carpenter doesn’t apply to CSLI gathered 17 months before under GFE

MI: Def’s admission he took a sleeping pill before driving added to PC for his blood

The affidavit for the blood search warrant here included that defendant admitted taking some kind of sleeping pill before driving and getting in the accident. That was probable cause and the good faith exception applies in any event. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Def’s admission he took a sleeping pill before driving added to PC for his blood

D.Conn.: A safe could be searched under SW in a homicide case; logical place for weapon or ammunition

There was probable cause to search a safe found in defendant’s house for evidence in a murder case because the firearms, ammunition, clothing, or electronic devices could be there. United States v. Fable, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129527 (D. Conn. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Scope of search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Conn.: A safe could be searched under SW in a homicide case; logical place for weapon or ammunition

D.Md.: Regular visitor with run of the house who never spent the night didn’t have standing

Defendant was a regular visitor at the place searched, but he did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. He was a regular social visitor about once a week for three years and had free run of the … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Md.: Regular visitor with run of the house who never spent the night didn’t have standing

E.D.Mich.: Carpenter doesn’t apply where CSLI was obtained nearly a year before

The SCA request for CSLI was issued here nearly a year before Carpenter. The good faith exception applies, and there will be no exclusion. United States v. Williams, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129639 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2018):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Carpenter doesn’t apply where CSLI was obtained nearly a year before

FL1: Inevitable discovery requires actual effort to get SW or exception swallows rule

There was no attempt by the officers to secure a search warrant. Probable cause alone isn’t enough: there has to be an effort to get a warrant for inevitable discovery to apply. “Any other result would allow the exception to … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on FL1: Inevitable discovery requires actual effort to get SW or exception swallows rule

N.D.Ill.: Cell phone SW in white collar case also for proof of perjury was a virtual computer search but it was still one issued on PC

In an investigation into job promotion and hiring fraud in the Cook County Circuit Clerk’s office, a cell phone search warrant was issued, and it was with probable cause. “Because the affidavit established probable cause to believe that Beena’s cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Cell phone SW in white collar case also for proof of perjury was a virtual computer search but it was still one issued on PC

E.D.Mich.: Cell phone SWs have to be considered like a computer search; this was broad yet still particular enough

The search warrant for defendant’s phone was broad, yes, but it was sufficiently particular, and the good faith exception applies as well. A cell phone is a computer, and the issue is analyzed the same. United States v. Chang, 2018 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Cell phone SWs have to be considered like a computer search; this was broad yet still particular enough

M.D.Tenn.: Def’s continual distancing himself in pleadings and at hearing from the cell phone at issue shows no standing

Defendant went to great lengths to distance himself from telephone 3 that was tracked in the suppression motion and hearing. Therefore, he has no standing to challenge the collection of CSLI on it. Carpenter and Byrd do not, as defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Def’s continual distancing himself in pleadings and at hearing from the cell phone at issue shows no standing

D.D.C.: Def’s IAC claim a Stingray was used was speculative at best; govt already had plenty from lawful sources

Even if a Stingray was used to get defendant’s information, which is speculative at best, the government lawfully used a host of other information gathering devices and orders to get the same information. Therefore, he wasn’t prejudiced. IAC claim denied. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Def’s IAC claim a Stingray was used was speculative at best; govt already had plenty from lawful sources

ID: Cell seizure of def’s notes for conversation with defense lawyer presumptively prejudicial; remanded to see if state can overcome prejudice and whether DA disqualified

Defendant was convicted of attempted murder. “While he was incarcerated prior to trial, Robins’s cell was searched and handwritten notes he had prepared in anticipation of a meeting with counsel were seized and delivered to the prosecuting attorney. The district … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on ID: Cell seizure of def’s notes for conversation with defense lawyer presumptively prejudicial; remanded to see if state can overcome prejudice and whether DA disqualified

IL: To argue defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing “seizure” instead of “search” is frivolous here

Defendant claimed his counsel was ineffective for not arguing the seizure was unreasonable rather than the search. That’s frivolous. People v. Lee, 2018 IL App (3d) 160100, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 569 (Aug. 1, 2018). [I had the same argument … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IL: To argue defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing “seizure” instead of “search” is frivolous here

CA11: Officer’s slight misnaming prior sex offense against a child in a CP warrant affidavit wasn’t a Franks violation

Petitioner raised 78 grounds in his 2255 against a life sentence for child pornography. “As to Ground 6, Freeman’s various arguments largely mischaracterize the supposedly false statements in the warrant affidavit. And although the affidavit seemingly incorrectly stated that his … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA11: Officer’s slight misnaming prior sex offense against a child in a CP warrant affidavit wasn’t a Franks violation

C.D.Ill.: 18 month pole camera surveillance of def’s house didn’t violate REP

18 month pole camera surveillance of defendant’s house didn’t violate his reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Tuggle, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127333 (C.D. Ill. July 31, 2018):

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: 18 month pole camera surveillance of def’s house didn’t violate REP

NY3: Cell phone SW must be based on fact and inference, not just “common sense”

A search warrant for a cell phone must be based on fact and inference not just on “common sense.” People v. Jemmott, 2018 NY Slip Op 05632, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5576 (3d Dept. Aug. 2, 2018). The application … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY3: Cell phone SW must be based on fact and inference, not just “common sense”

S.D.Ala.: That state court warrant was missing two pages when filed doesn’t matter when the whole SW produced in federal court

The search warrant was issued by a state court, and two pages were missing from the filed version. The complete version was presented in federal court, and the fact part was missing in state court is not a Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: That state court warrant was missing two pages when filed doesn’t matter when the whole SW produced in federal court