M.D.Tenn.: Def’s continual distancing himself in pleadings and at hearing from the cell phone at issue shows no standing

Defendant went to great lengths to distance himself from telephone 3 that was tracked in the suppression motion and hearing. Therefore, he has no standing to challenge the collection of CSLI on it. Carpenter and Byrd do not, as defendant urges, eliminating standing in a cell phone. United States v. Oakes, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128963 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 1, 2018).

The court finds only two of the factors relied upon by the officer to just barely be reasonable suspicion to support it, and the rest were innocuous. United States v. Berg, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128486 (D. Kan. Aug. 1, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.