Monthly Archives: March 2017

CA10: Random drug testing of juvenile detention supervisors was reasonable

The special needs doctrine justified warrantless random drug testing of juvenile detention officers. A documented problem of drug abuse is not required before they can be tested. The government satisfies its burden for random drug testing in this context balanced … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA10: Random drug testing of juvenile detention supervisors was reasonable

DE: Heavy foot traffic between a house there is PC as to doesn’t make the other subject to search

Heavy foot traffic between two homes is not indicative of criminal activity even where there is plenty of probable cause as to one. The other home is not guilty by association. State v. Harding, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 113 (March … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: Heavy foot traffic between a house there is PC as to doesn’t make the other subject to search

E.D.Cal.: Def satisfies Franks burden to get a hearing because nexus in affidavit for SW is weak

Defendant satisfies the Franks preliminary showing of false or misleading statements about alleged victims to get a Franks hearing. The nexus requirement of the affidavit is just barely met, and the hearing could undermine the probable cause showing. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Def satisfies Franks burden to get a hearing because nexus in affidavit for SW is weak

EFF: Border Agents Need A Warrant to Search Travelers’ Phones, EFF Tells Court

EFF: Border Agents Need A Warrant to Search Travelers’ Phones, EFF Tells Court (press release): The Border Isn’t a Constitution-Free Zone Richmond, Virginia—Border agents must obtain a warrant to search travelers’ phones, tablets, and laptops, which contain a vast trove … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on EFF: Border Agents Need A Warrant to Search Travelers’ Phones, EFF Tells Court

D.Ariz.: Immigration checkpoint stop can be enlarged because of smell of marijuana

During an immigration checkpoint on a state highway in Arizona, the smell of marijuana coming from the car allowed the stop to go longer under Rodriguez. “Ruiz-Hernandez has not pointed to any authority, in any context, where law enforcement is … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Immigration checkpoint stop can be enlarged because of smell of marijuana

D.Minn.: SW for “pornography” that “constitutes a crime” is specific enough to include CP

A search warrant for “pornography” that “constitutes a crime” is specific enough to include child pornography despite the fact that adult pornography isn’t a crime. There was also probable cause for issuance of the search warrant. United States v. Barthman, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: SW for “pornography” that “constitutes a crime” is specific enough to include CP

E.D.Pa.: Citizen informant pointing out def face-to-face presumptively reliable

A citizen informant pointing out defendant as having a gun, right in front of him, is entitled to presumptive credibility because she exposed her knowledge to defendant and risked retaliation. United States v. Slone, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38515 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Citizen informant pointing out def face-to-face presumptively reliable

CA10: QI isn’t determined by violation of state law; has to be violation of federal law

In a fractured panel decision, the Tenth Circuit holds that federal law governs qualified immunity, not state law. Here, defendant violated clearly established state law, but the district court didn’t decide whether it violated clearly established federal law. Remanded. Stanley … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: QI isn’t determined by violation of state law; has to be violation of federal law

IL: Dropping bottle when officer rolled down his window and said “come here” was not in response to a seizure

Defendant abandoned bottle of cannabis by dropping it when the officer rolled down his window and said “come here.” The court spends many paragraphs agreeing with the trial court that defendant hadn’t been seized at that point because it was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: Dropping bottle when officer rolled down his window and said “come here” was not in response to a seizure

W.D.Ky.: Even if there wasn’t PC for a home search, there was RS for a parole search

Even if the officer’s showing was insufficient to show probable cause, the officer could rely on defendant’s parole search waiver for the search because the information clearly provided at least reasonable suspicion. United States v. Ickes, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Even if there wasn’t PC for a home search, there was RS for a parole search

D.Del.: Dog sniff at a storage unit not a search

A dog sniff at a storage unit didn’t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. It isn’t the same as curtilage of the home. Defendant’s attempt to show a Franks discrepancy because he originally rented C43 but moved two weeks later … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on D.Del.: Dog sniff at a storage unit not a search

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: South Carolina police shot a man to pieces over $100 worth of pot, then lied about it

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: South Carolina police shot a man to pieces over $100 worth of pot, then lied about it by Radley Balko: Prosecutors drop drug charges against Julian Betton after cops’ account of the raid that paralyzed him … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Police misconduct | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: South Carolina police shot a man to pieces over $100 worth of pot, then lied about it

The Libertarian Republic: Rand Paul Reintroduces “FAIR Act” to Restore Respect for the 5th Amendment [in forfeitures]

The Libertarian Republic: Rand Paul Reintroduces “FAIR Act” to Restore Respect for the 5th Amendment [in forfeitures] Kentucky conservative Senator Rand Paul reintroduced S. 642, the FAIR (Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration) Act on Wednesday. The intention of the bill is … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on The Libertarian Republic: Rand Paul Reintroduces “FAIR Act” to Restore Respect for the 5th Amendment [in forfeitures]

S.D.Ala.: RS supported stop of defs’ boat in international waters; scuttling a sinking ship after full investigation not spoliation of evidence

The government showed reasonable suspicion to believe that defendants’ ship was engaged in drug smuggling when it was seen again off the Colombian coast heading to the U.S. along a known smuggling route. The USCG elected to scuttle the boat … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: RS supported stop of defs’ boat in international waters; scuttling a sinking ship after full investigation not spoliation of evidence

S.D.Fla.: Pictures on def’s Instagram account corroborated CIs

Defendant’s Instagram pages allowed agents to see photographs of firearms and bottles of promethazine with codeine (“molly”) and marijuana. Defendant was already a suspected molly distributor with two prior cocaine convictions, and that substantially helped show probable cause for a … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Pictures on def’s Instagram account corroborated CIs

AL: Lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory

The lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory. Keith v. State, 2017 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14 (March 17, 2017):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on AL: Lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory

TN: Overbroad certified question for appeal, such as “the [in]validity of the search and seizure,” leads to dismissal

In a non-search case, the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals dismisses an appeal for an overbroad “certified question” for appeal, citing from a 2001 search and seizure case where the issue was presented as “the validity of the search and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on TN: Overbroad certified question for appeal, such as “the [in]validity of the search and seizure,” leads to dismissal

W.D.Pa.: Telling def to stop moving his hands in a car wasn’t a seizure

Telling defendant to stop moving his hands around while he’s sitting in a car isn’t a “seizure.” When defendant complied, the officer who stopped him could see the corner of a baggie for drugs in plain view on the console, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Telling def to stop moving his hands in a car wasn’t a seizure

W.D.Ark.: Def counsel has apparent authority to receive property returned after arrest

In a civil action for return of property: “In the specific context of the disposition of property, district courts have found that the government acts appropriately when it disposes of property in a manner consistent with actions or representations made … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Def counsel has apparent authority to receive property returned after arrest

S.D.W.Va.: Flagrant violation of 4A with warrantless GPS on def’s car doesn’t get suppressed because of def’s lack of standing at time of search

The police flagrantly violated the Fourth Amendment by placing a GPS device on a car without a warrant. Defendant was the target, but he’d sold and relinquished control of the car to another days later by the time of the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Flagrant violation of 4A with warrantless GPS on def’s car doesn’t get suppressed because of def’s lack of standing at time of search