Monthly Archives: February 2017

The Atlantic: Papers, Please | passengers on a domestic flight ordered to produce ID to prove who they were

The Atlantic: Papers, Please by Garrett Epps:

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Papers, Please | passengers on a domestic flight ordered to produce ID to prove who they were

CNN: Sources: Trump signed off on checking White House staffers’ phones

CNN: Sources: Trump signed off on checking White House staffers’ phones by Jeff Zeleny and Daniella Diaz: President Donald Trump signed off on press secretary Sean Spicer’s decision to check aides’ cell phones to make certain they weren’t communicating with … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on CNN: Sources: Trump signed off on checking White House staffers’ phones

Law.com/The Recorder: Fighting Echo Warrant, Amazon Has Scant Law to Draw On

Law.com/The Recorder: Fighting Echo Warrant, Amazon Has Scant Law to Draw On by Ben Hancock: The showdown over access to data recorded by the Amazon ‘smart’ device is pushing the limits of traditional First Amendment and Fourth Amendment principles.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Law.com/The Recorder: Fighting Echo Warrant, Amazon Has Scant Law to Draw On

CA10 doesn’t defer to police: Travel plans were not implausible in context and did not support reasonable suspicion

Defendant’s speeding stop was valid, but the detention was unnecessarily long and without reasonable suspicion. The dog alert came too late after consent refused. The travel plans were not implausible at all in context and did not support reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10 doesn’t defer to police: Travel plans were not implausible in context and did not support reasonable suspicion

N.M.I.: Can you overcome officer’s credibility questions by calling it a “reasonable mistake of fact”?

Even if the trial court were to credit the defendant’s version that his sudden lane change was to dodge a puddle or a dog, the officer didn’t see a puddle or dog, just the lane change and that made the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.M.I.: Can you overcome officer’s credibility questions by calling it a “reasonable mistake of fact”?

E.D.Mo.: Affiant officers in drug cases don’t have to be chemistry experts to state conclusions about drugs

The affiant officers stated conclusions about the chemistry of some of the drugs in the 24 search warrants issued in this case. The law doesn’t require they be chemistry majors, experts, or Walter White to state those conclusions when the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Affiant officers in drug cases don’t have to be chemistry experts to state conclusions about drugs

NYLJ: Indefinite Gag Orders Under the Stored Communications Act

NYLJ: Indefinite Gag Orders Under the Stored Communications Act by Peter A. Crusco:

Posted in ECPA | Comments Off on NYLJ: Indefinite Gag Orders Under the Stored Communications Act

New Book: H-Net, The Fourth Amendment in an Age of Surveillance

New Book: H-Net, The Fourth Amendment in an Age of Surveillance by David C. Gray Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication Date: 4/30/2017

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on New Book: H-Net, The Fourth Amendment in an Age of Surveillance

D.Colo.: Collective knowledge doctrine does not require that the officer requesting a stop actually tell the other officers the reason why

The collective knowledge doctrine does not require that the officer requesting a stop actually tell the other officers the reason why. United States v. Rubio-Sepulveda, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23866 (D. Colo. Feb. 21, 2017):

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Collective knowledge doctrine does not require that the officer requesting a stop actually tell the other officers the reason why

E.D.Tex.: Cell phone + drug case = PC to search cell phone

Drug dealers commonly use cell phones to ply their trade, and that was stated in the affidavit for the search warrant. The USMJ signed the warrant for cell phones, too. Accordingly, the search warrant was executed in good faith. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Cell phone + drug case = PC to search cell phone

D.Ariz.: SI valid for open container violation

Defendant was stopped by a tribal officer for speeding. He smelled of alcohol, and there were apparent minors in the car. The officer had defendant get out of the car and two open containers were seen. A search incident to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SI valid for open container violation

WaPo: The used car that came with a special option: A GPS device secretly installed by the police

WaPo: The used car that came with a special option: A GPS device secretly installed by the police by Orin Kerr:

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on WaPo: The used car that came with a special option: A GPS device secretly installed by the police

techdirt: Judge: FBI’s NIT Warrant Invalid And IP Addresses Do Have An Expectation Of Privacy, But No Suppression Granted

techdirt: Judge: FBI’s NIT Warrant Invalid And IP Addresses Do Have An Expectation Of Privacy, But No Suppression Granted by Tim Cushing: Thanks to the FBI’s one-to-many NIT warrant, which was issued in Virginia but reached thousands of computers all … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on techdirt: Judge: FBI’s NIT Warrant Invalid And IP Addresses Do Have An Expectation Of Privacy, But No Suppression Granted

NE implied consent law was unconstitutional as applied here, but not on its face

“In this instance, without a warrant, nor exigent circumstance, the State could only rely upon the exception of a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest for drunk driving in order to demand a blood test from McCumber. With the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE implied consent law was unconstitutional as applied here, but not on its face

CO: SW for things that could transmit pictures to a computer fairly included a digital camera

The search warrant was for digital images and was for computers, storage media, and things that could transmit pictures to the computer. That fairly included defendant’s digital camera. People v. Raehal, 2017 COA 18, 2017 Colo. App. LEXIS 199 (Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on CO: SW for things that could transmit pictures to a computer fairly included a digital camera

D.Nev.: Govt responds it won’t use evidence seized at trial so motion for return of property or to suppress granted

The government seized defendant’s iPad and but didn’t search it because they didn’t have a password. Finally, they decided not to attempt to use it as evidence, so the motion for return of property is granted. The government didn’t intend … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Govt responds it won’t use evidence seized at trial so motion for return of property or to suppress granted

W.D.Mo.: The occupant’s stepping back from the door and opening it showed consent to enter to look for def

Officers could conclude that the occupant consented to entry when the police knocked and they said they were looking for somebody inside, and she backed away and opened the door more. United States v. McDaniel, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25372 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: The occupant’s stepping back from the door and opening it showed consent to enter to look for def

Law.com: Eleventh Circuit Questions Calhoun’s Challenge of Injunction on Indigent Bail

Law.com Daily Report: Eleventh Circuit Questions Calhoun’s Challenge of Injunction on Indigent Bail by R. Robin McDonald: Lawyers representing the city of Calhoun appeared Thursday before a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit seeking to … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on Law.com: Eleventh Circuit Questions Calhoun’s Challenge of Injunction on Indigent Bail

TN: Def’s post-conviction burden is to show that the motion to suppress would have prevailed

On a post-conviction petition that defense counsel was ineffective, the defense has to put on proof to show that there is some reason to believe that the motion to suppress would have been granted if it had been pursued at … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Def’s post-conviction burden is to show that the motion to suppress would have prevailed

OR: Automobile exception applies to any lawful stop where PC of a crime develops

The automobile exception applies when a vehicle is lawfully stopped for any reason and then probable cause develops. State v. Bliss, 283 Ore. App. 833, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 256 (Feb. 23, 2017). Defendant requested a meeting with the police … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Automobile exception applies to any lawful stop where PC of a crime develops