Monthly Archives: January 2017

NC: Def waived issue of RS for appeal by arguing PC instead; on merits, there was RS anyway

Defendant abandons his argument that there was no reasonable suspicion for his stop by providing no argument on reasonable suspicion and instead focusing on probable cause. Going to the record, however, the court finds reasonable suspicion for the stop because … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on NC: Def waived issue of RS for appeal by arguing PC instead; on merits, there was RS anyway

LA4: Search incident for curfew violation arrest was reasonable

An arrest of a juvenile for even the minor offense of a curfew violation justified a search incident when the juvenile was placed in the police car. State ex rel. R.M., 2017 La. App. LEXIS 68 (La.App. 4 Cir. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LA4: Search incident for curfew violation arrest was reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: When state officers seize and hold property in federal case, return of property under Rule 41(g) not possible

State officers obtained a search warrant for defendant’s property which they held but was being used in a federal prosecution. Rule 41(g) does not enable the defendant to get return of property held by state officials even though there is … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: When state officers seize and hold property in federal case, return of property under Rule 41(g) not possible

CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure. May v. City of Nahunta, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), same result on rehearing, May v. City of Nahunta, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

W.D.Va.: Leaving cell phone outside fed courthouse under ashtray, where CSOs commonly recommended hiding phones, was a waiver of REP in phone, albeit not abandonment

Defendant came to the federal courthouse because his mother was being arrested, and DHS officers invited him there. He did not know that he had an arrest warrant, too. When he got to the courthouse, he was told he couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Leaving cell phone outside fed courthouse under ashtray, where CSOs commonly recommended hiding phones, was a waiver of REP in phone, albeit not abandonment

E.D.Mich.: Sex trafficking a minor in a hotel room was exigency for warrantless entry on PC

Defendant rented his hotel room under a known alias of his for which he had an ID card. That gave him standing. The exigency of sex trafficking a minor justified the officer’s warrantless entry, and it’s apparent there was probable … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Sex trafficking a minor in a hotel room was exigency for warrantless entry on PC

WA: There must be a nexus between the scope of a parole search and what is being looked for

“¶17 We agree with [State v. Jardinez, 184 Wn. App. 518, 338 P.3d 292 (2014)] that the [Sentencing Guidelines] Commission’s comment is strong evidence that the legislature intended that there must be a nexus between the suspected violation and the … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WA: There must be a nexus between the scope of a parole search and what is being looked for

IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question

IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question by John Ribeiro: The company has objected in a lawsuit to unreasonable US government requests for customer data

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question

VA: While def didn’t have standing as to whole car, he did in the space immediately around him, relying on Jones GPS case

Defendant passenger was removed from a car after a traffic stop, and the officer with the defendant directed another to look for what he thought was a gun, which the other officer found. Defendant was held not to have standing … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on VA: While def didn’t have standing as to whole car, he did in the space immediately around him, relying on Jones GPS case

WaPo: Justice Frankfurter speaks

WaPo: Justice Frankfurter speaks by Orin Kerr: The Harvard Law Library recently posted a neat 46-minute interview of Justice Felix Frankfurter from the early 1960s. Frankfurter, who is interviewed by Professor Paul Freund, speaks about legal education, the role of … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: Justice Frankfurter speaks

E.D.Pa.: Seizure of years of emails by SW for later discriminating search was still reasonable

This email search warrant sought specific information over a several year period, and the Google production was somewhat limited yet still substantial. Yet, included were emails between attorney and client and there were no search protocols. The court declines to … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Seizure of years of emails by SW for later discriminating search was still reasonable

N.D.Ind.: 911 caller stayed on phone and gave a “play-by-play” of what the defendant was doing that was quickly corroborated by the police

911 caller stayed on phone and gave a “play-by-play” of what the defendant was doing that was quickly corroborated by the police. That was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Jeanes, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181601 (N.D.Ind. Nov. 29, 2016), adopted, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: 911 caller stayed on phone and gave a “play-by-play” of what the defendant was doing that was quickly corroborated by the police

N.D.Ind.: 911 caller’s info was transmitted and she revealed enough about herself to not be an anonymous CI

911 calls aren’t always truly anonymous. A 911 caller, whose number was captured by the system, called about a man pacing in a motel parking lot with a gun in hand. The caller gave enough information about herself that she … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: 911 caller’s info was transmitted and she revealed enough about herself to not be an anonymous CI

JD Supra: Is There an Opening to Withdraw or Modify Electronic Logging Device Rule [for motor carriers]?

JD Supra: Is There an Opening to Withdraw or Modify Electronic Logging Device Rule? by Lawrence Hamilton II & Jameson Rice. The Electronic Logging Device for over the road truckers goes into effect February 17th with full compliance by December … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on JD Supra: Is There an Opening to Withdraw or Modify Electronic Logging Device Rule [for motor carriers]?

D.P.R.: PC permits a warrantless arrest for a felony; no right to arrest at earliest possible time

If there is probable cause for an arrest without a warrant, it doesn’t matter that officers had time to get an arrest warrant and didn’t or that they didn’t arrest at the earliest possible time. An arrest warrant is not … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.P.R.: PC permits a warrantless arrest for a felony; no right to arrest at earliest possible time

D.V.I.: Def’s failure to move or respond to officers shouting then pounding on windows justified opening door under emergency exception

Defendant’s failure to respond at all to officers standing next to his stopped vehicle justified opening the door under the emergency exception. United States v. Nisbett, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4067 (D.V.I. Jan. 11, 2017):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Def’s failure to move or respond to officers shouting then pounding on windows justified opening door under emergency exception

CA6: Sheriff’s deputy relying on writ of execution didn’t violate 4A

Defendant deputy sheriff and the state court plaintiffs acting on a writ of execution issued by the trial court couldn’t be sued over it. Without even considering Tennessee’s post-judgment execution law and even assuming the writ was improperly issued, no … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Sheriff’s deputy relying on writ of execution didn’t violate 4A

AZ: Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny; this one lacked all particularity and no GFE applies

Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny. The search warrant for defendant’s computer lacked any particularity, and it could not be saved by the good faith exception. State v. Dean, 2017 Ariz. App. LEXIS 12 (Jan. 12, 2017):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on AZ: Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny; this one lacked all particularity and no GFE applies

OH2: Def providing key when asked was consent to opening locked drawer

The record supports the conclusion that defendant consented to opening a locked drawer by providing the key when the officer asked for it. State v. Muncy, 2017-Ohio-121, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 89 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2017). Defendant was stopped … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH2: Def providing key when asked was consent to opening locked drawer

OH8: 911 call about a door open and a possible break-in justified police entry to check

A minister called the police to report the door of a warehouse across the street was open, and he felt something was wrong and it must be a break-in. The police respond and enter and see a marijuana grow operation. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH8: 911 call about a door open and a possible break-in justified police entry to check