Daily Archives: January 22, 2017

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby, 15-1485 (Jan. 19, 2017). Issues: (1) Whether police officers who found late-night partiers inside a vacant home belonging to someone else had probable cause to arrest the partiers for trespassing under the Fourth Amendment, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

CA6: Franks challenges subject to clearly erroneous standard of review; here, materiality not shown

The District Court’s findings under Franks are subject to the clear error standard of review. Here, the officer learned a new fact between the wiretap application and the search warrant application, and there is some surface appeal to apply Franks. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Franks challenges subject to clearly erroneous standard of review; here, materiality not shown

WV: GSR removal subject to search incident–no SW required

Taking gunshot residue without a warrant incident to arrest is reasonable because it disappears so fast. [The court analogizes blood alcohol, but GSR can disappear easily within minutes, simply by putting one’s hands in pockets or rubbing hands together.] State … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on WV: GSR removal subject to search incident–no SW required

CA11: First offender DNA sample that should have been destroyed under state law but wasn’t could be used in federal prosecution

Under Georgia law, a DNA sample from a first offender should be expunged from the system when he completes his probation or sentence. This one wasn’t. Whatever the statute says, it doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Hinton, … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA11: First offender DNA sample that should have been destroyed under state law but wasn’t could be used in federal prosecution

FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress under the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement because the trial court’s finding that the detective’s intrusion onto the curtilage was justified for officer safety was not supported by … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

OH8: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a 4A claim

Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Gibson, 2017-Ohio-102, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 107 (8th Dist. Jan 12, 2017). Defendant was stopped for swerving on the highway. When he … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a 4A claim