Daily Archives: January 26, 2017

E.D.Cal.: No right to return of iPad and iPhone as long as they have evidentiary value, including through appeal

Defendant does not have a right to return of seized property under Rule 41(g) as long as there is potential evidentiary value, including through appeal. Defendant does not claim that his iPad and iPhone weren’t illegally seized to begin with; … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: No right to return of iPad and iPhone as long as they have evidentiary value, including through appeal

E.D.Mich.: Squeezing bag of MJ when taking it off def wasn’t unreasonable; it was apparent what it was

Squeezing a baggie of suspected marijuana to sense its feel was not unreasonable, if that is part of defendant’s argument, which isn’t obvious. It was at arms length when seized, and its appearance was marijuana anyway. United States v. Barnes, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Squeezing bag of MJ when taking it off def wasn’t unreasonable; it was apparent what it was

N.D.Ga.: Police reports attached to post-hearing brief not in evidence would not be considered

“[T]he Court does not consider the exhibits that Smith attached to his post-evidentiary hearing brief. These documents presumably were in Defendant’s possession at the time of the evidentiary hearings and could have been used to cross-examine the witnesses. Smith does … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Police reports attached to post-hearing brief not in evidence would not be considered

M.D.Pa.: Girlfriend’s misstatement about presence of other persons in house during probation search justified protective sweep

“[O]fficers went to Mr. Owens’ residence to conduct a probationary check. After knocking on the door, officers were told by Mr. Owens’ girlfriend, Ms. Haqq, that he was not present and that she was the only adult at the residence. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Girlfriend’s misstatement about presence of other persons in house during probation search justified protective sweep