Monthly Archives: May 2016

N.D.Ala.: Flyover revealed MJ plants in backyard; warrantless entry violated curtilage; no exigency shown

Police in a helicopter saw a marijuana grow in defendant’s backyard. The backyard was not visible from the road. Therefore, the backyard was clearly curtilage, and the police warrantless entry into the back yard violated the Fourth Amendment. There was … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Flyover revealed MJ plants in backyard; warrantless entry violated curtilage; no exigency shown

D.S.D.: A pre-Rodriguez delay didn’t warrant suppression despite the lack of reasonable suspicion

Defendant was stopped in an Eighth Circuit state governed by the former de minimus rule three months prior to Rodriguez, and it’s already been held that the old rule applies until that date. The district court finds the officer’s assertions … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.S.D.: A pre-Rodriguez delay didn’t warrant suppression despite the lack of reasonable suspicion

CA7: Excessive lighting at a traffic stop (which this really wasn’t) isn’t excessive force in a high crime area at night

Defendant’s car was parked within 15′ of a crosswalk, a violation of state law unless passengers were getting out. The officers saw no driver and nobody getting out, so they pulled up on the car and shined a light and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA7: Excessive lighting at a traffic stop (which this really wasn’t) isn’t excessive force in a high crime area at night

CA3: Def’s complaint about how CP forensic search was done didn’t rise to “objective unreasonableness”

In a computer search for child pornography, the use of the “hashing” function rather than “gallery view function” is not constitutionally required. That was an issue in United States v. Burgess, 576 F.3d 1078 (10th Cir. 2009), which the court … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s complaint about how CP forensic search was done didn’t rise to “objective unreasonableness”

W.D.N.Y.: Consenter said she had no common authority over a barn but officers assumed it and broke in; suppressed

Defendant’s wife told the officers that she could not consent to entry into the barn on their farm because she told them she didn’t have authority and she wasn’t on the deed. The officers caucused, acknowledged the consent problem amongst … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Consenter said she had no common authority over a barn but officers assumed it and broke in; suppressed

CA6: SW for cell phone based on PC defeats § 1983 case over phone search

“Professional hunter William ‘Spook’ Spann sued his former employee and several officers from the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of his constitutional rights during an investigation into his hunting practices. The district court … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA6: SW for cell phone based on PC defeats § 1983 case over phone search

CA6: Where def refused to provide combination to his safe during execution of a SW, it was reasonable to pry it open

Defendant showed the police that he had marijuana inside his home and the police obtained a warrant to search his home. Thus, suppression was not warranted because there was an outright certainty, not just a “fair probability,” that the house … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: Where def refused to provide combination to his safe during execution of a SW, it was reasonable to pry it open

E.D.Va.: The gov’t had individualized suspicion for a forensic border search of def’s cell phone

The post-arrest, off-site forensic search of defendant’s phone was instead a border search, which did not require a warrant supported by probable cause. The first search of defendant’s phone conducted at the airport was a routine border search that did … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: The gov’t had individualized suspicion for a forensic border search of def’s cell phone

MN: Police had exigency to seize cell phone during murder investigation

Police were interviewing defendant in a murder case. Once her story started making no sense anymore, an officer seized her phone and then applied for a warrant to search it. The officer had exigent circumstances to seize the phone to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MN: Police had exigency to seize cell phone during murder investigation

NC: Lack of findings on justification for stop required; remanded

The basis of the stop was no valid tags, but that was wrong. Yet the trial court found the stop “justified.” “This conclusion consists of a statement of law, followed by the conclusion that Detective O’Hal was ‘justified’ in initiating … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Lack of findings on justification for stop required; remanded

RI: Description of CP sufficient for PC; magistrate doesn’t have to view it

An issuing magistrate doesn’t have to see the child pornography to find probable cause it was on the subject computer; a description will do. IP information tied to the child pornography was probable cause for the residence and computers in … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk, Probable cause | Comments Off on RI: Description of CP sufficient for PC; magistrate doesn’t have to view it

WI: Def’s “custody” during raid was limited to getting DNA sample

Defendant’s house was raided with him in it, but he was not arrested and his “custody” status was limited to getting a buccal swab under the warrant. He was not in custody, albeit Summers permitting it, when he was talking. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on WI: Def’s “custody” during raid was limited to getting DNA sample

W.D.N.Y.: No point in reopening suppression hearing for new evidence that won’t change the outcome

Defendant sought to reopen the suppression hearing, and it’s denied because the new evidence wouldn’t alter the outcome at all on the question of apparent consent. United States v. Archambault, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61783 (W.D.N.Y. May 9, 2016). “The … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of proof | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No point in reopening suppression hearing for new evidence that won’t change the outcome

E.D.Tex.: SW for gun was clearly without PC and no reasonable officer could rely on it; court considers Second Amendment implications in denying govt GFE

The affidavit truly failed to show probable cause, and a reasonably well trained police should have known it. This involved a gun in the home, and considering the Second Amendment right to bear arms and the Fourth Amendment right to … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: SW for gun was clearly without PC and no reasonable officer could rely on it; court considers Second Amendment implications in denying govt GFE

ars technica: Senators put forward new bill to halt expansion of gov’t hacking powers

ars technica: Senators put forward new bill to halt expansion of gov’t hacking powers by Cyrus Farivar: Rule 41 change will let feds search “millions of computers” from just one warrant.

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on ars technica: Senators put forward new bill to halt expansion of gov’t hacking powers

Pacific Standard: Murder at the Border

Pacific Standard: Murder at the Border by Julie Morse In a rare ruling, Border Patrol Agent Lonnie Swartz has been indicted for the murder of Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez, the 16-year-old he shot across border lines.

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Pacific Standard: Murder at the Border

The Hill: Dem introduces bill to block new government hacking powers

The Hill: Dem introduces bill to block new government hacking powers by Katie Bo Williams:

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on The Hill: Dem introduces bill to block new government hacking powers

VI: An investigative subpoena doesn’t have to specify who is under investigation, but it’s helpful to the recipient to identify records

An investigative subpoena doesn’t have to specify who is under investigation, but it’s helpful to the recipient to identify records. “[A] specific person has not yet been associated with the matter. In such cases, an investigative subpoena should generally describe … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on VI: An investigative subpoena doesn’t have to specify who is under investigation, but it’s helpful to the recipient to identify records

OH: Court couldn’t order return of property where statute gave executive branch discretion to not return

A warrant was issued to permit ODA officers to enter property to look for wild animals being kept there. The warrant did not require seizure but referred to the statute that vests that discretion in the Director. The judge thus … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH: Court couldn’t order return of property where statute gave executive branch discretion to not return

IN: Def mom’s arrest outside of home permitted officers to enter to check on unattended young children

Defendant was stopped at night on the way to the store for milk for her kids for morning, and she was arrested and searched because she smelled of marijuana. She told the officers about the children at home alone. The … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: Def mom’s arrest outside of home permitted officers to enter to check on unattended young children