Daily Archives: May 26, 2016

CNET: Senate bill would let FBI read your emails without a court order

CNET: Senate bill would let FBI read your emails without a court order by Shara Tibken The 2017 Intelligence Authorization Act would deal a blow to privacy by making government surveillance easier.

Posted in E-mail, National security | Comments Off on CNET: Senate bill would let FBI read your emails without a court order

TX: Two cases on exigency for warrantless blood draw for DUI

Cole v. State, 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 84 (May 25, 2016) (dissent), found exigency, reversing the court of appeals. Defendant here drove 110 mph down a city street, ran a red light, and the ensuing accident resulted in a … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on TX: Two cases on exigency for warrantless blood draw for DUI

CA9: It was obvious by signs and longstanding practice that military bases are secure; having to lockup belongings before a consensual interview on the base wasn’t a seizure

Plaintiff was employed by the military, and NCIS had him come to a base for an interview about budgetary matters. The base was secure and everybody entering was subject to search and knew it from the signs. In the interview … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Special needs | Comments Off on CA9: It was obvious by signs and longstanding practice that military bases are secure; having to lockup belongings before a consensual interview on the base wasn’t a seizure

PA: Trial court erred in finding separate room in apt searched with SW was somebody else’s separate living quarters

The search warrant was for an apartment, and there was no justification for the trial court’s finding that a separate room inside was really separate living quarters for somebody else. There was no separate entrance or no mailbox. Commonwealth v. … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Trial court erred in finding separate room in apt searched with SW was somebody else’s separate living quarters

Slate: If You Fly a Drone, so Can Police

Slate: If You Fly a Drone, so Can Police by Stephen E. Henderson: What the Fourth Amendment says about law enforcement use of unmanned aerial vehicles.

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Slate: If You Fly a Drone, so Can Police

AZ: When statute unambiguous, officer’s mistake of law a little hard to argue

The officer’s stop of defendant based on a mistake of law about the taillight being a backup light was not reasonable. The statute was unambiguous, and Heien provides no support. State v. Stoll, 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 89 (May 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on AZ: When statute unambiguous, officer’s mistake of law a little hard to argue

D.Neb.: Controlled buys and watching def to go his storage unit for more was PC

Defendant had been coming and going from a storage unit where the police knew he stored methamphetamine. “There had been controlled purchases of methamphetamine directly from Leyva-Martinez. Officer Milone and other OPD officers had sufficient probable cause to stop the … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Controlled buys and watching def to go his storage unit for more was PC

CA9: 911 call about two black male teenagers involved in a crime didn’t give PC to arrest three Samoan teenagers; immediately recognizing a toy gun as such wasn’t RS

The court of appeals had jurisdiction to consider defendant officers’ appeal from denial of qualified immunity on plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment unlawful arrest and search claims, but the court’s jurisdiction was limited to deciding whether the officers were entitled to qualified … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: 911 call about two black male teenagers involved in a crime didn’t give PC to arrest three Samoan teenagers; immediately recognizing a toy gun as such wasn’t RS

CA4: Failure to make eye contact or acknowledge police not RS

Defendant was stopped because he was the only person seen in a three block radius from a shots fired call. His failure to respond to the police or make eye contact was ambiguous and within his rights, so it couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Failure to make eye contact or acknowledge police not RS

Cal.6: RS existed for only a few seconds and dissipated but police continued the detention; consent came during invalid arrest

Defendant consented to a patdown which produced a small hard object that resulted in his handcuffing. It was a diamond, and the handcuffing stopped, but the stop didn’t. “We agree with defendant that, once police realized the object was a … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.6: RS existed for only a few seconds and dissipated but police continued the detention; consent came during invalid arrest