Daily Archives: May 22, 2016

FL5: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident valid under Davis GFE

Pre-Riley cell phone search incident: “We agree that the initial search violated Burton’s Fourth Amendment rights but nevertheless affirm the denial of his motion to suppress evidence based on the exception to the exclusionary rule articulated by the United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL5: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident valid under Davis GFE

IN: Blanket probation search condition was valid

Defendant was told he had a blanket search condition as a condition of probation. Prior case law in Indiana has held that reasonable suspicion isn’t required, and this court can’t and won’t change it. Hodges v. State, 2016 Ind. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Blanket probation search condition was valid

OH7 follows Hudson; failure to knock-and-announce doesn’t warrant suppression

A failure to properly knock-and-announce an entry does not warrant suppression, following Hudson v. Michigan. State v. Bembry, 2015-Ohio-5598, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 5397 (7th Dist. December 30, 2015). [Yes, just now on Lexis.] The motion to suppress is denied … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Knock and announce | Comments Off on OH7 follows Hudson; failure to knock-and-announce doesn’t warrant suppression

N.D.Cal.: Def’s stop here was really no more than on a hunch; RS lacking for mere proximity to a crime

On the totality, officers lacked reasonable suspicion to stop defendant for mere proximity to a crime. The government’s hypotheticals don’t overcome that this was essentially a hunch. She stared straight ahead when there were a bunch of police cars around, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s stop here was really no more than on a hunch; RS lacking for mere proximity to a crime