Daily Archives: May 4, 2016

techdirt: National Intelligence Office’s Top Lawyer Fires Off Spirited Defense Of Bulk Surveillance, Third Party Doctrine

techdirt: National Intelligence Office’s Top Lawyer Fires Off Spirited Defense Of Bulk Surveillance, Third Party Doctrine by Tim Cushing: Robert Litt, General Counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, has been given space at the Yale Law … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on techdirt: National Intelligence Office’s Top Lawyer Fires Off Spirited Defense Of Bulk Surveillance, Third Party Doctrine

IN: Walking into a house during a drug raid justifies a frisk

Defendant drove up to a house in the process of a drug raid. Eight people were in custody. Defendant was stopped when he got to the door, and he was frisked and a gun was found. The search was valid … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Walking into a house during a drug raid justifies a frisk

KS: State gets benefit of GFE in DUI cases in a post-McNeely stop but before state supreme court ruled

While McNeely was decided in April 2013 and defendant’s DWI stop was in September 2013, the state supreme court had not held the implied consent statute unconstitutional until later. Therefore, the good faith exception applied. State v. Kraemer, 2016 Kan. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: State gets benefit of GFE in DUI cases in a post-McNeely stop but before state supreme court ruled

AL SWs must be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed

Search warrants in Alabama have to be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed. Here, the warrant was to the Sheriff of Mobile County, but an officer of the Mobile PD executed it. This was invalid execution. … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL SWs must be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed

CA8: POs had RS to seize and search a flash drive from def’s residence during a probation search caused by a tip

Probation officers had reasonable suspicion to seize a flash drive found during a supervised-release search of defendant’s residence. Reasonable suspicion existed because of defendant’s prior conviction for possession of child pornography, a release condition prohibiting him from accessing a computer, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: POs had RS to seize and search a flash drive from def’s residence during a probation search caused by a tip