Daily Archives: May 19, 2016

E.D.Tex.: SW for gun was clearly without PC and no reasonable officer could rely on it; court considers Second Amendment implications in denying govt GFE

The affidavit truly failed to show probable cause, and a reasonably well trained police should have known it. This involved a gun in the home, and considering the Second Amendment right to bear arms and the Fourth Amendment right to … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: SW for gun was clearly without PC and no reasonable officer could rely on it; court considers Second Amendment implications in denying govt GFE

ars technica: Senators put forward new bill to halt expansion of gov’t hacking powers

ars technica: Senators put forward new bill to halt expansion of gov’t hacking powers by Cyrus Farivar: Rule 41 change will let feds search “millions of computers” from just one warrant.

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on ars technica: Senators put forward new bill to halt expansion of gov’t hacking powers

Pacific Standard: Murder at the Border

Pacific Standard: Murder at the Border by Julie Morse In a rare ruling, Border Patrol Agent Lonnie Swartz has been indicted for the murder of Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez, the 16-year-old he shot across border lines.

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Pacific Standard: Murder at the Border

The Hill: Dem introduces bill to block new government hacking powers

The Hill: Dem introduces bill to block new government hacking powers by Katie Bo Williams:

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on The Hill: Dem introduces bill to block new government hacking powers

VI: An investigative subpoena doesn’t have to specify who is under investigation, but it’s helpful to the recipient to identify records

An investigative subpoena doesn’t have to specify who is under investigation, but it’s helpful to the recipient to identify records. “[A] specific person has not yet been associated with the matter. In such cases, an investigative subpoena should generally describe … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on VI: An investigative subpoena doesn’t have to specify who is under investigation, but it’s helpful to the recipient to identify records

OH: Court couldn’t order return of property where statute gave executive branch discretion to not return

A warrant was issued to permit ODA officers to enter property to look for wild animals being kept there. The warrant did not require seizure but referred to the statute that vests that discretion in the Director. The judge thus … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH: Court couldn’t order return of property where statute gave executive branch discretion to not return

IN: Def mom’s arrest outside of home permitted officers to enter to check on unattended young children

Defendant was stopped at night on the way to the store for milk for her kids for morning, and she was arrested and searched because she smelled of marijuana. She told the officers about the children at home alone. The … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: Def mom’s arrest outside of home permitted officers to enter to check on unattended young children

CA7: PC existed because officer recognized HGH on sight and an anonymous tip corroborated his belief

“Agent Cagnoni’s affidavit gave the magistrate judge a robust factual foundation to authorize a search of Dessart’s Reedsville residence.” While the HGH would take a while to test, the officer pretty much knew it when he saw it because that … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA7: PC existed because officer recognized HGH on sight and an anonymous tip corroborated his belief

CA11: Ptf consented to the broader OSHA inspection

The plaintiff was found to have consented to the broad OSHA inspection, and there obviously was no requirement of a Miranda warning before the inspection. There is no small business exception to the OSHA inspection requirements. Peacock Timber Co. v. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Apparent authority | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf consented to the broader OSHA inspection

CA10: “not every domestic call justifies a warrantless entry,” but this one objectively did

“Although not every domestic call justifies a warrantless entry, see id. at 1244 (rejecting ‘a special rule for domestic calls because they are inherently violent’), the officers had information in addition to the call that indicated McCoy’s girlfriend’s safety could … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA10: “not every domestic call justifies a warrantless entry,” but this one objectively did