Daily Archives: May 30, 2016

N.D.Ind.: CI was adequately corroborated and predictive info proved correct

The CI had been working with the drug officers for four months, and his significant information had been significantly corroborated. He also accurately predicted that $400,000 would be packaged and shipped by defendant. That was probable cause. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: CI was adequately corroborated and predictive info proved correct

OH10: Plain view during consent search supported SW when consent withdrawn

Officers responding to a shots fired call asked defendant about a gun in his house. He denied there was one and consented to a search of the first floor. In the bathroom, officers saw crack cocaine in plain view. They … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH10: Plain view during consent search supported SW when consent withdrawn

D.Neb.: Protective sweep justified by arrest on weapons charges, somebody peeking through blinds, and sounds from inside

Officers executing an arrest warrant for weapons charges had reasonable suspicion for a protective sweep based on sounds from the basement and somebody peeking through the blinds. United States v. Alatorre, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69171 (D.Neb. May 26, 2016). … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Protective sweep justified by arrest on weapons charges, somebody peeking through blinds, and sounds from inside

S.D.Ala.: No suppression hearing if defense doesn’t contradict govt’s assertions of fact

When the defendant doesn’t controvert the material facts in the government’s response to his motion to suppress, a hearing isn’t required because all the court has is to apply the law to the facts. United States v. Sledge, 2016 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: No suppression hearing if defense doesn’t contradict govt’s assertions of fact

N.D.Ga.: The question is PC for a SW, not what else officers could do to get more information; if they have PC, that’s all that’s required

The fact officers could have done more to validate their suspicions about a Facebook picture and who the child was and defendant and child pornography allegedly involving the same child, it isn’t constitutionally required if probable cause exists. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: The question is PC for a SW, not what else officers could do to get more information; if they have PC, that’s all that’s required

SC: Where def avoided a DUI checkpoint, he couldn’t challenge its constitutionality

Where defendant was stopped because he avoided a checkpoint, the constitutionality of the checkpoint isn’t relevant to the appeal because there was no stop. An officer pursued and found the car parked with the lights off. Coming up to the … Continue reading

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on SC: Where def avoided a DUI checkpoint, he couldn’t challenge its constitutionality