Category Archives: Seizure

OH10: Asking for DL of driver of parked car was a stop of everybody in the car

Defendant was in a parked car with others when the police pulled up. It became a stop of everybody in the car under Brendlin when the officer asked for ID, and there was no reasonable suspicion of any crime whatsoever. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH10: Asking for DL of driver of parked car was a stop of everybody in the car

N.D.Cal.: Waving money and looking nervous on a street corner was RS to a trained narcotics officer

A police officer stopping behind an already parked car isn’t a stop of the person who is free to walk away, United States v. Kim, 25 F.3d 1426 (9th Cir. 1994), but it is of the car. Here, officers had … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Waving money and looking nervous on a street corner was RS to a trained narcotics officer

OH9: Where the car in which defendant was a passenger was going to be inventoried, def’s detention for officer safety was reasonable

The continued detention of the defendant passenger in a car, incidental to the stop of the driver, pending the inventory of the car was reasonable. The trial court resolved a fact dispute and concluded that defendant consented to a search … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on OH9: Where the car in which defendant was a passenger was going to be inventoried, def’s detention for officer safety was reasonable

NC: Taking defendant’s driver’s license back to the patrol car to run it is a seizure of the person and not de minimus under Rodriguez; RS required

Taking defendant’s driver’s license back to the patrol car to run it is a seizure of the person and not de minimus under Rodriguez. Reasonable suspicion is required. State v. Leak, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 445 (June 2, 2015) (2-1):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Taking defendant’s driver’s license back to the patrol car to run it is a seizure of the person and not de minimus under Rodriguez; RS required

E.D.Wis.: Circumstantial evidence of drug dealing will support a SW; direct evidence not required

Circumstantial evidence of drug dealing is all that’s required for a search warrant to issue for a house. “Similarly, in United States v. Burton, 288 F.3d 91, 103 (3rd Cir. 2002), the court held that direct evidence of drug-dealing activity … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Circumstantial evidence of drug dealing will support a SW; direct evidence not required

OR concludes that pulling a package out of sorting line violates possessory interest

The recipient of a package has, under U.S. Mail regulations, a limited right to control the package even when in transit because it can be redirected. Here, the package was pulled out for a dog sniff. (Decided under Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on OR concludes that pulling a package out of sorting line violates possessory interest

CA4: Denial of consent to enter but admission of meth justified seizure of house to get a SW

Officers came to defendant’s house to do a knock-and-talk about a methamphetamine lab. “Then one of the troopers asked Appellant if he would consent to a search of the home. He refused to consent and informed the troopers they were … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: Denial of consent to enter but admission of meth justified seizure of house to get a SW

DC Cir.: Asking defendant about having a gun wasn’t a stop before he fled

Officers in the DC Metro PD’s gun recovery unit saw defendant walking, and one asked “[H]ey, it is the police, how are you doing? Do you have a gun?” Defendant didn’t answer, so the car stopped and one got out … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on DC Cir.: Asking defendant about having a gun wasn’t a stop before he fled

CA3: Officers confronted with an unknown call of a screaming woman were not unreasonable in waiting to sort it out, even though it resulted in a delay of getting a woman to the hospital where she died

In a “tragic” case of a young woman dying from lock of oxygen to the brain from an asthma attack, police responded to a 911 call of a “woman screaming” and didn’t know what they had. When they arrived, the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Officers confronted with an unknown call of a screaming woman were not unreasonable in waiting to sort it out, even though it resulted in a delay of getting a woman to the hospital where she died

PA: Fourth Amendment applies to mental commitment proceedings

The Fourth Amendment applies in mental commitment proceedings, and there must be probable cause for the seizure of the person the state seeks to commit. The fact that the criminal rules don’t apply to these proceedings does not mean that … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Fourth Amendment applies to mental commitment proceedings

MD: Painstaking discussion of a mere “accosting” and a stop

Distinguishing between a mere accosting of persons in a parked car and a stop, the court finds this was a detention governed by the Fourth Amendment and without reasonable suspicion. There was a call at 12:11 am about “drug activity” … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on MD: Painstaking discussion of a mere “accosting” and a stop

KS: Davis GFE applied to a blood draw process valid at time but later held unconstitutional

Defendant was involved in a head-on accident and was unconscious at the hospital when his blood was drawn. The good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies because, at the time of the blood draw, it was lawful under state … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on KS: Davis GFE applied to a blood draw process valid at time but later held unconstitutional

IN: Transporting to stationhouse is a seizure

Transporting a juvenile down to the station was a seizure requiring probable cause, and here it was lacking. The patdown was unreasonable. D.Y. v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 147 (March 11, 2015). Officers had probable cause for the search … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on IN: Transporting to stationhouse is a seizure

D.Alaska: It was reasonable to seize a store where heroin was being sold pending getting a SW

Officers could enter a store where heroin sales were allegedly occurring to seize the store. They told the defendant to put down his phone, and that was reasonable to preserve evidence. A call came in to the phone and the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Alaska: It was reasonable to seize a store where heroin was being sold pending getting a SW

W.D.Tenn.: Summers doesn’t prohibit a search of a defendant near execution of a search warrant when there is probable cause for search of person

Summers doesn’t prohibit a search of a defendant near execution of a search warrant when there is probable cause for a search of his person. United States v. Matlock, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181607 (W.D.Tenn. October 24, 2014). Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Summers doesn’t prohibit a search of a defendant near execution of a search warrant when there is probable cause for search of person

D.Minn.: Emergency lights alone doesn’t prove a “stop”; defendant was already parked

Defendant was already parked, so he wasn’t stopped, and the officer’s use of the emergency lights on his police car are not determinative of whether there was a “stop.” There was no display of weapons, touching of defendant, no coercive … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Emergency lights alone doesn’t prove a “stop”; defendant was already parked

OH8: Nine gang officers stopped and surrounded a group of men on the street; no reasonable suspicion

A gang unit was driving in a four vehicle convoy into the hood. When they came upon a group of men, the cars all stopped and nine officers got out and surrounded them. All officers were armed with visible weapons, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH8: Nine gang officers stopped and surrounded a group of men on the street; no reasonable suspicion

NYLJ: Challenge to State’s Retention of Seized Computers Dismissed

NYLJ: Challenge to State’s Retention of Seized Computers Dismissed by Andrew Keshner: The state’s seizure and two-year retention of computers during a criminal case did not amount to unlawful taking, a Fourth Department panel ruled, reversing a Court of Claims … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on NYLJ: Challenge to State’s Retention of Seized Computers Dismissed

OR: Officer pulled into gas station behind defendant and made him talk, thereby making it a stop

Defendant pulled into a gas station, gassed up, and bought a drink. When he came out, a police car was parked behind him, and the officer required him to talk about the reason for the “stop.” This became a stop … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Officer pulled into gas station behind defendant and made him talk, thereby making it a stop

Daily Report: Judge Again Rejects Attorney’s Suit Over Courthouse Security Dispute

Daily Report: Judge Again Rejects Attorney’s Suit Over Courthouse Security Dispute by Alyson Palmer: A federal district court judge has once again rejected a lawsuit by an Atlanta lawyer who claims she was injured in a 2010 dispute with a … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on Daily Report: Judge Again Rejects Attorney’s Suit Over Courthouse Security Dispute