Category Archives: Seizure

N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies

There were factual mistakes in the affidavit for search warrant, but it doesn’t undermine the probable cause showing. In any event, the mistakes are in good faith and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Naum, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies

PA: “The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.”

“The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.” The brief detention here wasn’t based on reasonable suspicion and implicated the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Adams, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 1734 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: “The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.”

WA: It’s defendant’s burden to show a seizure occurred

“An appellant making an unconstitutional seizure claim has the burden of proving that a seizure occurred. … [¶] Here, Yang consented to Koster’s entry. Throughout their time in the house, Lucas and Koster told Ho what they were doing. They … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: It’s defendant’s burden to show a seizure occurred

S.D.Ga.: Rule 41(g) doesn’t enable return of property the govt doesn’t have

Property not in the hands of the federal government cannot be ordered returned under Rule 41(g). Administratively forfeited case can’t be returned; there was a remedy. United States v. Morris, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45071 (S.D.Ga. Mar. 19, 2019). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Rule 41(g) doesn’t enable return of property the govt doesn’t have

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: New Cert Petition: Does the Fourth Amendment Allow “Information Seeking” Stops of Suspects?

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: New Cert Petition: Does the Fourth Amendment Allow “Information Seeking” Stops of Suspects? by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: New Cert Petition: Does the Fourth Amendment Allow “Information Seeking” Stops of Suspects?

S.D.N.Y.: A prison cell search doesn’t need justification

“‘[P]rison officials are presumed to do their best to evaluate and monitor objectively the security needs of the institution and the inmates in their custody, and then to determine whether and when such concerns necessitate a search of a prison … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: A prison cell search doesn’t need justification

D.Ariz.: Driving below “normal speed of traffic” is undefined and couldn’t form basis for stop

There is no statutory definition of ‘normal speed of traffic.’ And, Officer Anderson did not testify that the SUV was driving less than the ‘normal speed of traffic’ as required by the statute. Rather, he stated that the SUV was … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Driving below “normal speed of traffic” is undefined and couldn’t form basis for stop

CA4: 31 day delay in getting SW for cell phone was unreasonable

The government’s 31 day delay in getting a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone after its seizure was unreasonable and required suppression of the alleged child pornography on the phone. Because defendant was sentenced to life, the error was not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: 31 day delay in getting SW for cell phone was unreasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Destruction of surveillance cameras before search not a “seizure” or due process violation

The government destroyed defendant’s surveillance cameras as a part of the search just before it started. He asserts a Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment due process claim as a result. The court finds no authority that disabling the cameras was … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Destruction of surveillance cameras before search not a “seizure” or due process violation

D.D.C.: Community caretaking function doesn’t apply well to seizures; seizure and frisk suppressed

Officers responded to a drive-by shooting allegedly picked up by ScatterShot. Officers grabbed defendant’s arm ostensibly to see if he’d been shot, and it was readily apparent that he had not been, and he denied it. The community caretaking function … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Community caretaking function doesn’t apply well to seizures; seizure and frisk suppressed

CA2: Remand required for determination for reason for delay in getting computer SW

Defendant was found passed out in a car on a rural road with the car in gear and the engine running. A tablet was on the seat. Searching the car for information about him, an image of child pornography was … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Racial profiling, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA2: Remand required for determination for reason for delay in getting computer SW

CA9: Seizure of a vehicle for 30 days for no DL without alternatives was unreasonable

Plaintiffs get summary judgment on their damages claim against the County and officers for impounding vehicles if the driver never had a valid DL rather than letting others take the vehicle. It was an unreasonable seizure. The state has a … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Seizure of a vehicle for 30 days for no DL without alternatives was unreasonable

CNS: Suit Over Search on Domestic Delta Flight Advances

CNS: Suit Over Search on Domestic Delta Flight Advances by Josh Russell:

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CNS: Suit Over Search on Domestic Delta Flight Advances

KS: Def was already stopped when police approached; he got out of car and locked it and was arrested; no possessory interest involved when a drug dog sniffed his locked parked car

Defendant was stopped on a grocery store parking lot, got out of the car, and locked it. He was searched incident to arrest. A little later a drug dog came and stiffed the car. Defendant was deprived of no possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Seizure | Comments Off on KS: Def was already stopped when police approached; he got out of car and locked it and was arrested; no possessory interest involved when a drug dog sniffed his locked parked car

Orin Kerr: “At what point is a driver asleep in an electric car that is on autopilot ‘seized’ by the police slowing down and stopping the car by getting in front of it?”

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on Orin Kerr: “At what point is a driver asleep in an electric car that is on autopilot ‘seized’ by the police slowing down and stopping the car by getting in front of it?”

CA10: A notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes

Giving plaintiff a notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes. Leon v. Summit County, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33349 (10th Cir. Nov. 28, 2018). The information from the CI was detailed, down to a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: A notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes

D.N.M.: Parking across def’s driveway wasn’t his seizure when he was hiding under a trailer

The officer parking across defendant’s driveway wasn’t his seizure. Defendant wasn’t seized until he came out from under a trailer. When he was seized, it was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Shelton, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197713 (D. N.M. … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Parking across def’s driveway wasn’t his seizure when he was hiding under a trailer

CA10: 17 hour seizure of def’s home while investigating wife’s OD was unreasonable; consent was product of the illegal seizure; exclusion required

Defendant’s wife had a seizure and stopped breathing at 5 am. He called 911. The police secured the home and denied him access. They obtained alleged consent after a few hours. They didn’t get a search warrant until 10 pm … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: 17 hour seizure of def’s home while investigating wife’s OD was unreasonable; consent was product of the illegal seizure; exclusion required

CA6: Police cannot summarily kill dogs in houses they search

From 1919-2014, it violated Michigan law to have an unlicensed dog over six months old, and state law and city ordinance permitted officials to kill them. In 2014, that changed. Plaintiffs became squatters in an abandoned house in Detroit, and … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Police cannot summarily kill dogs in houses they search

TN: Def wasn’t seized when officer parked next to him to talk, but he was when he tried to leave and was told to stop; all reasonable

Stopping next to defendant’s car to talk to him wasn’t a seizure. When defendant moved and attempted to leave, the officer told him to stop, and that was a seizure. The encounter was based on an anonymous caller’s information, and … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on TN: Def wasn’t seized when officer parked next to him to talk, but he was when he tried to leave and was told to stop; all reasonable