Category Archives: Seizure

CA11: Officer’s threat to arrest ptf for trespass if he didn’t leave a shopping center wasn’t a seizure

Police officer’s threat to arrest plaintiff for trespass if he didn’t leave a shopping center was not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Watkins v. Ramcharan, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 25016 (11th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019). The officer’s encounter with a parked … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Officer’s threat to arrest ptf for trespass if he didn’t leave a shopping center wasn’t a seizure

D.Ariz.: IRS seizure of funds in registry of court not 4A violation

IRS seizure of funds in the registry of the court invades no Fourth Amendment interest of the taxpayer. United States v. Bigley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142220 (D. Ariz. Aug. 20, 2019).* No showing that ICE raid was conducted egregiously … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: IRS seizure of funds in registry of court not 4A violation

M.D.Ga.: Def handcuffed for officer safety was unMirandized, and his statement admitting to gun that led to search for it suppresses both

Officers had a right during a traffic stop to check criminal history, and that legitimately led to finding defendant’s search waiver. The Georgia search waiver is not complete, however, and more stringent than the one in Samson. He was handcuffed … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Def handcuffed for officer safety was unMirandized, and his statement admitting to gun that led to search for it suppresses both

IN: Even if admitting SW affidavit at trial was error, it was harmless based on all the evidence

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s car, but he also had a community corrections search waiver on file. (The latter wasn’t even acknowledged by the parties.) Defendant was suspected of an ongoing operation of drug selling, so the older … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IN: Even if admitting SW affidavit at trial was error, it was harmless based on all the evidence

N.D.Ga.: Def’s removal for questioning and 8 hour detention could’t be justified under Summers

Defendant’s handcuffing and removal to the police station for interrogation could not be justified by Summers and was without probable cause. He was held eight hours and interrogated. United States v. Mitchell, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139026 (N.D. Ga. June … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def’s removal for questioning and 8 hour detention could’t be justified under Summers

SD: Def wasn’t stopped by the officer when he encountered car based on anonymous call

Police received an anonymous call that a particular van was DUI. An officer found the van parked at a gas station, parked far enough away that defendant could back out, and he walked up and asked how defendant was doing, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on SD: Def wasn’t stopped by the officer when he encountered car based on anonymous call

CA2: Ordering ptf out of a city council meeting that had been disrupted wasn’t a 4A seizure

Making plaintiff leave a city council meeting that had been disrupted by her and others was not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Guiding her out wasn’t either. Youkhanna v. City of Sterling Heights, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 24165 (6th Cir. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA2: Ordering ptf out of a city council meeting that had been disrupted wasn’t a 4A seizure

D.D.C.: Def tossed gun as encounter started and that was abandonment, but the court has questions about the encounter

The DC Gun Recovery Unit encountered a person on the street and talked to him, but by the time a more intensive encounter occurred, something that troubled the court, defendant had tossed the gun. United States v. Meekins, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Seizure | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Def tossed gun as encounter started and that was abandonment, but the court has questions about the encounter

CA11: Telling ptf to move his car wasn’t a 4A seizure

Ordering plaintiff off a parking lot because of suspected trespassing wasn’t a Fourth Amendment seizure. Watkins v. Joy, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22910 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2019). X-ray for contraband on an inmate is not a Fourth Amendment claim. … Continue reading

Posted in Search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Telling ptf to move his car wasn’t a 4A seizure

KY: Officers approached men on a street corner talking; telling def to “hang tight for a minute” because he wanted to run his name and SSN was a seizure requiring RS

Officers saw a group on a corner, so they initiated contact, just because they wanted to. They also attempted to get them to clean up the trash on the corner, which wasn’t shown to be their fault or responsibility. When … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Officers approached men on a street corner talking; telling def to “hang tight for a minute” because he wanted to run his name and SSN was a seizure requiring RS

N.D.Iowa: Holding def’s driver’s license shows he’s not free to leave

The officer continued to hold defendant’s driver’s license, and that meant to him he sure wasn’t free to leave. United States v. Steffens, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122096 (N.D. Iowa July 23, 2019). Defendant was stopped for a muddy license … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Holding def’s driver’s license shows he’s not free to leave

TN: Def counsel can’t be ineffective for not moving to suppress where it’s apparent there was no standing

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not moving to suppress evidence seized off a co- defendant because defendant wouldn’t have any standing. Smith v. State, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 442 (July 22, 2019).* It was professionally reasonable for defense … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on TN: Def counsel can’t be ineffective for not moving to suppress where it’s apparent there was no standing

PA: Refusal to submit to a test is admissible under Birchfield

“[W]e conclude the ‘evidentiary consequence’ provided by Section 1547(e) for refusing to submit to a warrantless blood test — the admission of that refusal at a subsequent trial for DUI — remains constitutionally permissible post-Birchfield. We therefore affirm the order … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Refusal to submit to a test is admissible under Birchfield

CA6: When PC is shown for the SW, what’s not there really doesn’t matter

There was probable cause on the totality for this search warrant. Defendant’s attack on what’s not there doesn’t help him. United States v. Jones, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 20851 (6th Cir. July 15, 2019). There was a factual basis for … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: When PC is shown for the SW, what’s not there really doesn’t matter

W.D.N.C.: The fact def’s car crossed the county line between when the police car lights came on and when he was stopped is not a basis to suppress

The fact a stop was started in one county and actually occurred as defendant crossed the county line is not a basis for suppressing the stop. Defendant’s consent to search his house is suppressed, however, because of language difficulties: “Thus, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: The fact def’s car crossed the county line between when the police car lights came on and when he was stopped is not a basis to suppress

VT: SW target gets a hearing on whether he gets access to his own SW materials

“In this matter, Jacob Oblak petitioned the superior court for access to an affidavit of probable cause filed in a criminal case and was denied.” The public access to records rule has another rule for exceptions was not properly applied. … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on VT: SW target gets a hearing on whether he gets access to his own SW materials

CA6: State sanctioned blood draws of newborns and keeping the samples stated 4A claim

Plaintiffs stated a Fourth Amendment claim that the state took blood samples from children to check for diseases and then retained them in the Michigan Neonatal Biorepository. Remanded for further consideration. Kanuszewski v. Michigan Dept. of Health and Human Services, … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: State sanctioned blood draws of newborns and keeping the samples stated 4A claim

MA: Pinging a cell phone is a search, but here it was with exigent circumstances

Pinging a cell phone to find its location was a search under the Massachusetts Constitution and Fourth Amendment, but it was reasonable because the state showed true exigent circumstances. Commonwealth v. Almonor, 482 Mass. 35 (Apr. 23, 2019). Washington declines … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on MA: Pinging a cell phone is a search, but here it was with exigent circumstances

CA5: QI granted officer who detained business owner for 4 hrs for civil violation

Detaining a business owner for four hours for civil violations and pulling a gun wasn’t clearly established as a Fourth Amendment violation, so the officer gets [away with it by getting] qualified immunity. Okorie v. Crawford, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: QI granted officer who detained business owner for 4 hrs for civil violation

ScotusBlog: Argument preview: Searching for an accrual rule when the government fabricates evidence in a criminal proceeding

ScotusBlog: Argument preview: Searching for an accrual rule when the government fabricates evidence in a criminal proceeding by Howard M. Wasserman: McDonough v. Smith, to be argued on April 17, offers the Supreme Court another opportunity to clarify when civil-rights … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Seizure | Comments Off on ScotusBlog: Argument preview: Searching for an accrual rule when the government fabricates evidence in a criminal proceeding