Category Archives: Plain view, feel, smell

M.D.Pa.: Traffic stop may be highly technical, but it still has a factual and legal basis

“Although many reasonable people may agree that the stop at issue here was a highly technical, ‘ticky-tacky’ sort of traffic stop, there is no doubt that Florida law requires a driver to stop at a clearly marked stop line before … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Traffic stop may be highly technical, but it still has a factual and legal basis

IN: Hard ball in pocket during frisk was immediately apparent it was drugs

A casino enforcement agent told defendant he had to be patted down before their sitting in an interview room. A round ball was felt in defendant’s pocket, and it was immediately apparent to the officer from training and experience that … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IN: Hard ball in pocket during frisk was immediately apparent it was drugs

NY4: No REP in a handgun placed under car bumper in driveway at sidewalk visible from off the property

When defendant saw the police car at night, he crouched down behind the rear bumper of his minivan and stood up. The officers could see a gun there, and it was approximately at where the sidewalk and the driveway met. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NY4: No REP in a handgun placed under car bumper in driveway at sidewalk visible from off the property

CA6: Police called to ER for shooting victim can make plain view

When the police are called to the ER for a shooting victim, the bloody clothes can be in plain view. United States v. Clancy, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35567 (6th Cir. Nov. 12, 2020):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Police called to ER for shooting victim can make plain view

WV: SW not needed to seize cell phone from a person, even when it’s expected to be found

The warrantless seizure of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable. The officers didn’t need to get a search warrant before taking it off his person. State v. Deem, 2020 W. Va. LEXIS 706 (Oct. 20, 2020). The officer’s prior knowledge of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WV: SW not needed to seize cell phone from a person, even when it’s expected to be found

N.D.W.Va.: A pipe in a car that could have legitimate uses still was incriminating enough for plain view

A pipe logically and usually used for smoking pot was seized in plain view because its incriminating nature was immediately apparent. The fact it could be used for legal substances doesn’t detract from that. United States v. Runner, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: A pipe in a car that could have legitimate uses still was incriminating enough for plain view

OH8: Smell of MJ justifies search of interior of car where it could be found

“Upon en banc consideration, we uphold the conclusion reached in Franklin, and reiterate that the heightened standard set forth in Farris does not apply to searches conducted within the passenger compartment of a vehicle. Consistent with the confines of Farris, … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH8: Smell of MJ justifies search of interior of car where it could be found

FL4: Police use of a flashlight isn’t itself a search

“R.F. appeals the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence. Because we conclude appellant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes where the deputy used a spotlight and a flashlight to illuminate his approach of appellant, we affirm the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Search, Waiver | Comments Off on FL4: Police use of a flashlight isn’t itself a search

OH10: Anonymous 911 call didn’t support def’s stop

A 911 anonymous tipster’s call wasn’t justification for defendant’s stop because it was wrong as to clothing and it essentially described all the black men in the area. State v. Walton, 2020-Ohio-5062, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3906 (10th Dist. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH10: Anonymous 911 call didn’t support def’s stop

Chicago Sun Times: Does Illinois’ pot law pass the smell test? Scent of weed can still prompt cops to search vehicles

Chicago Sun Times: Does Illinois’ pot law pass the smell test? Scent of weed can still prompt cops to search vehicles By Tom Schuba (“For many folks, the fragrance of weed is unmistakable. But the mere smell of pot can … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on Chicago Sun Times: Does Illinois’ pot law pass the smell test? Scent of weed can still prompt cops to search vehicles

MT: Plain view justifies automobile exception search

Seeing contraband in plain view justifies an entry into a car under the automobile exception. State v. Tenold, 2020 MT 263, 2020 Mont. LEXIS 2461 (Oct. 20, 2020). Three controlled buys were probable cause despite defendant’s argument that the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MT: Plain view justifies automobile exception search

FL4: SW of def’s cell phone authenticated text messages

After a search warrant produced defendant’s text messages, the state was able to authenticate them by the phone. State v. Torres, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 14356 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 7, 2020). “In addition, ‘[d]uring a valid traffic stop, officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on FL4: SW of def’s cell phone authenticated text messages

CA4: Seizure of firearm was inevitable; def would have been arrested for DUI and searched incident to arrest anyway

“[W]e conclude that the district court did not err in crediting the arresting officer’s testimony and finding that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Herman for driving under the influence. We further conclude that the district court did … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Seizure of firearm was inevitable; def would have been arrested for DUI and searched incident to arrest anyway

N.D.Ohio: Def’s version more credible than the police version, and motion to suppress is granted

The court sides with the defense on the credibility of the witnesses that defendant’s gun wasn’t in plain view after all, and it grants the motion to suppress. Even though he has an extensive criminal history, which the government seeks … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s version more credible than the police version, and motion to suppress is granted

OH11: Def’s admission he was wearing same shoes as the day of the murder was plain view

Defendant’s admission at his police interview that he was wearing the same shoes as the time of the murder justified seizure of the shoes as plain view. State v. Thomas, 2020-Ohio-4635, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3482 (11th Dist. Sept. 28, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Def’s admission he was wearing same shoes as the day of the murder was plain view

AL: Manipulating object in pocket of person leaving a drug house exceeded Terry

Defendant’s patdown resulted in an impermissible Terry and Dickerson search of her pocket. The state never showed it was apparent that the object being manipulated was a weapon. It was a search for drugs because she was stopped leaving a … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on AL: Manipulating object in pocket of person leaving a drug house exceeded Terry

TX9: Officer didn’t smell MJ in car until he unreasonably opened car door; suppression affirmed

“Deferring to the trial court’s findings of fact and viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling, as we must, the trial court could have reasonably concluded from the evidence at the suppression hearing that … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on TX9: Officer didn’t smell MJ in car until he unreasonably opened car door; suppression affirmed

OH3: Contents of bookbag shown by baggies of drugs hanging out of it

Based on the officer’s observation of baggies of drugs hanging out of a bookbag, the contents were readily apparent. State v. Burroughs, 2020-Ohio-4417, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3301 (3d Dist. Sept. 14, 2020). Defendant’s objection to the R&R had a … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH3: Contents of bookbag shown by baggies of drugs hanging out of it

AK: Aerial surveillance of a residential backyard to photograph it with a telephoto lens violates the state constitution

Aerial surveillance of a residential backyard to photograph it with a telephoto lens violates the Alaska Constitution where the landowner took precautions to protect his privacy at ground-level. McKelvey v. State, 2020 Alas. App. LEXIS 71 (Sept. 4, 2020):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on AK: Aerial surveillance of a residential backyard to photograph it with a telephoto lens violates the state constitution

CA10: Where wrong standard of review applied below, undisputed facts allow appellate court to still decide

“Because the evidence presented by the government at the evidentiary hearing in this case was largely undisputed, we conclude that the district court’s factual findings were not clearly erroneous, and that its misapplication of the standard of review does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA10: Where wrong standard of review applied below, undisputed facts allow appellate court to still decide