Category Archives: Cell phones

GA: Three year delay in searching cell phone not unreasonable on these facts

Nearly three year delay between seizure of defendant’s cell phone and electronics and their search was not unreasonable here where defendant was in jail throughout and thus he had a far diminished possessory interest. Nelson v. State, S21A0773 (Ga. Sept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: Three year delay in searching cell phone not unreasonable on these facts

W.D.Mo.: RS def was in violation of order of protection justified vehicle stop

Reasonable suspicion defendant was driving a car with a child in it in violation of an order of protection was justification for his stop. When the car was stopped, the smell of marijuana justified its further search. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: RS def was in violation of order of protection justified vehicle stop

The Atlantic: Your Phone Is Your Private Space

The Atlantic: Your Phone Is Your Private Space (“Without evidence of wrongdoing, neither public agents nor private companies should be rifling through the photos on your personal devices.”)

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Your Phone Is Your Private Space

Raw Story: Mo Brooks bellyaches about Congress seizing his phone records: ‘They should not have access to anything’

Raw Story: Mo Brooks bellyaches about Congress seizing his phone records: ‘They should not have access to anything’ by David Edwards:

Posted in Cell phones, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Raw Story: Mo Brooks bellyaches about Congress seizing his phone records: ‘They should not have access to anything’

D.N.J.: Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo

The affidavit for search warrant was based on probable cause. Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo. United States v. Harper, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162543 (D.N.J. Aug. 26, 2021). Defendant was stopped with reasonable suspicion, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo

NY (Kings Co.): SW for cell phone failed to show nexus to the crime

“As such, the People failed to establish a nexus, supported by probable cause, that the cell phone recovered was the cell phone used at the time they allege the defendant committed the charged crimes and therefore cannot satisfy the required … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on NY (Kings Co.): SW for cell phone failed to show nexus to the crime

9to5Mac: Apple’s Find My app leads police to arrest suspect after searching for lost iPhone

9to5Mac: Apple’s Find My app leads police to arrest suspect after searching for lost iPhone by Filipe Espósito. (Using the Find My app of the officer’s phone, “The police then succeeded in arresting Sandoval after tracking him for about an … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on 9to5Mac: Apple’s Find My app leads police to arrest suspect after searching for lost iPhone

N.D.Ga.: Cell phone lock screen is in plain view

On a cell phone, “information that simply appears on a lock screen, without requiring digital entry, is in plain view.” United States v. Blair, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156445 (N.D.Ga. Aug. 18, 2021). Defendant didn’t have a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Cell phone lock screen is in plain view

ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

Defendant’s patdown as a passenger on smell of marijuana was reasonable during the stop, but a search of his person was not. There was no justification for a search of his person. State v. K.V. (In the Interest of K.V.), … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

The New Mexico regulatory scheme for truck inspections has already been held to satisfy Burger. Stopping defendants’ truck for inspection at an inspection station was reasonable under that standard. On opening the trailer to compare to the bills of lading, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

WaPo: Apple plans to scan iPhones to find sexual predators. Some fear the software could be weaponized.

WaPo: Apple plans to scan iPhones to find sexual predators. Some fear the software could be weaponized. By Reed Albergotti (“The new push pits Apple against civil liberties activists and appears to contradict some of the company’s own long-held assertions … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Apple plans to scan iPhones to find sexual predators. Some fear the software could be weaponized.

E.D.Cal.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a contraband cell phone found on him in prison. The contents of the phone were used in a drug distribution indictment. The government got a search warrant for the contents of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

TN: Consent in the face of a threat to get a SW is invalid where no PC

Defendant’s consent in the face of the officer’s threat to get a search warrant was involuntary where there was no probable cause for a warrant. State v. Cohen, 2021 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 356 (July 29, 2021). There was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Seizure | Comments Off on TN: Consent in the face of a threat to get a SW is invalid where no PC

CA8: SW for CP didn’t include “cell phone” in “electronic devices,” but GFE covers it

The search warrant here was for electronic devices that could hold child pornography, and it failed to specifically mention defendant’s cell phone. The good faith exception, however, overcame this omission of particularity. United States v. Pospisil, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on CA8: SW for CP didn’t include “cell phone” in “electronic devices,” but GFE covers it

N.D.Cal.: “Hot watch” order for real time travel information isn’t disclosable yet; matter still under investigation

The government made an “Application request[ing] an order compelling Sabre, a travel technology firm, ‘to provide representatives of the FBI complete and contemporaneous ‘real time’ account activity’ for an individual subject to an arrest warrant—what the government refers to as … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: “Hot watch” order for real time travel information isn’t disclosable yet; matter still under investigation

CA2: Parole search valid under “special needs” even without RS

The parole search here lacked reasonable suspicion, but it was justified by the special needs exception to the warrant requirement. “Because a search undertaken by a parole officer of a parolee to detect parole violations is ‘reasonably related to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Parole search valid under “special needs” even without RS

W.D.Mo.: How long is too long a wait for search of a seized cell phone: reasonableness controls

“A seizure reasonable at its inception because it is based upon probable cause may become unreasonable as a result of its duration. The duration of the seizure pending the issuance of a search warrant must still be reasonable, and reasonableness … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: How long is too long a wait for search of a seized cell phone: reasonableness controls

CA8: Cell tower warrant to ID robbers was reasonable and with PC

Cell phone tower warrant in an effort to solve multiple robberies by identifying repeated phone use was reasonable when the question is a “substantial basis,” which there was. United States v. James, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 20336 (8th Cir. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: Cell tower warrant to ID robbers was reasonable and with PC

OR: Venn diagram of PC to a place or thing (nexus)

State v. Turay, 313 Ore. App. 45, 53, 2021 Ore. App. LEXIS 941 (July 8, 2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Venn diagram of PC to a place or thing (nexus)

CA3: No REP in sent text messages

“[C]ounsel notes that he moved to suppress the text messages Bereznak and A.G. exchanged, arguing that those messages were acquired from A.G.’s cellphone in violation of Bereznak’s Fourth Amendment rights. This issue lacks merit because Bereznak had no reasonable expectation … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA3: No REP in sent text messages