Category Archives: Informant hearsay

CA8: Stop of car apparently leaving scene of crime was valid

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop based on the fact the vehicle matched the description of one leaving the scene of a robbery by time and proximity, too. United States v. Daniel, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8504 (8th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Stop of car apparently leaving scene of crime was valid

CA3: Controlled buy moots Franks challenge to CI

The CI’s story was confirmed by two controlled buys. The Franks challenge to the CI fails as to whether it was corroborated or completely immaterial because of the controlled buys. United States v. Carney, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8116 (3d … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Controlled buy moots Franks challenge to CI

NY1: Cross-exam of police officers’ alleged deficient investigation opened door to CI’s information

Defendant’s cross-examination of officers on the alleged lack of quality of their investigation opened the door to why they were there, the CI’s story. The trial court mitigated the prejudice by a limiting instruction. People v. Brown, 2018 NY Slip … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY1: Cross-exam of police officers’ alleged deficient investigation opened door to CI’s information

TN: Uncorroborated anonymous tip insufficient

The anonymous tip in this case was not corroborated, and it was insufficient even under the Tennessee Supreme Court’s 2017 adoption of Gates and rejection of Aguilar-Spinelli. State v. Dibrell, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 224 (Mar. 26, 2018). There … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on TN: Uncorroborated anonymous tip insufficient

NJ: If driver can’t find registration after reasonable time, police can search for it

Defendant was given a reasonable amount of time to produce the registration of his vehicle. When he’s unwilling or unable to locate it, that justifies a limited “pinpoint” search of the vehicle for the registration in the glove box or … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NJ: If driver can’t find registration after reasonable time, police can search for it

OH8: A pill bottle search wasn’t plain view during execution of SW for firearms

The police had a search warrant for firearms, and, during execution of the warrant, the officers looked in a pill bottle. The state’s plain view argument is unavailing because it wasn’t immediately apparent to the officers. “We further find little … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Overseizure, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH8: A pill bottle search wasn’t plain view during execution of SW for firearms

OH8: Trash pull helped corroborate informant hearsay

The police received informant hearsay, and sought to corroborate it, and a trash pull did it. State v. Rieves, 2018-Ohio-955, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1021 (8th Dist. Mar. 15, 2018). The town’s housing inspection scheme is reasonable under the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Dog sniff, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH8: Trash pull helped corroborate informant hearsay

LA5: A micro data storage card in defendant’s watch pocket could be seized incident to arrest

A micro data storage card in defendant’s watch pocket could be seized incident to arrest. It was then searched with a warrant. The informant was a victim, and thus didn’t need to be corroborated. “Knocking on a door does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on LA5: A micro data storage card in defendant’s watch pocket could be seized incident to arrest

PA: SW papers issued by GJ retain secrecy and aren’t open

The search warrant issued by a state grand jury are still entitled to grand jury secrecy, compared to other judicial records. The court followed In re Gwinnett Cty. Grand Jury, 284 Ga. 510, 668 S.E.2d 682 (2008). In re 2014 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on PA: SW papers issued by GJ retain secrecy and aren’t open

OH11: Def’s vehicle and occupants matching description of bank robbery getaway car and suspects was RS

Defendant’s vehicle matched the description of a bank robbery suspect’s truck in terms of the color, size, make, and model, and the defendant matched the suspect’s description in terms of his gender, race, and clothing. That was reasonable suspicion. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: Def’s vehicle and occupants matching description of bank robbery getaway car and suspects was RS

MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

The 2008 CSLI warrant here was based on a “conclusory statement” of witness statements being credible and “bereft of the factual details required to establish probable cause.” It had to be suppressed. (Based on Fourth Amendment and state constitution.) Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

CA10: Three CIs corroborated each other and were independently corroborated

The affidavit for the arrest warrant was based on three CIs who corroborated each other and which were independently corroborated by the police. A Franks challenge was included that a prior search resulted in finding drugs that were not mentioned … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: Three CIs corroborated each other and were independently corroborated

LA3: Once parolee found in possession of MJ, search of his hotel room was justified

Defendant was arrested for possession of marijuana so the search of his wallet was justified as a search incident. As a parolee, his hotel room was his “residence” for purposes of a parole search. State v. Warren, 2018 La. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA3: Once parolee found in possession of MJ, search of his hotel room was justified

CA6: Nexus to cell phones shown through investigation plus def was using his when arrested

Nexus was shown to defendant’s cell phone because the affidavit in support of the search warrant for the phone showed that the gang had used cell phones to communicate and defendant was using his phone when arrested and he’d already … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus to cell phones shown through investigation plus def was using his when arrested

NY3: In camera CI reliability hearing established it

“Based on our in camera review of the transcript of the Darden hearing, we are satisfied that County Court properly determined that the CIs existed and provided reliable and timely information that justified a finding that probable cause existed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY3: In camera CI reliability hearing established it

OR: Def disavowed consent issue in trial court, so he couldn’t argue it on appeal

Defendant disavowed the argument made on appeal in the trial court, and you just can’t do that. “Defendant failed to preserve his argument because he failed to provide the trial court with an objection, let alone ‘an explanation of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OR: Def disavowed consent issue in trial court, so he couldn’t argue it on appeal

D.Utah: The REP is reduced on the curtilage of a duplex

Defendant was found to have abandoned property on the common area of the duplex. The privacy of the curtilage is reduced when there are others on the joint property of a duplex. United States v. Lucero, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Curtilage, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Utah: The REP is reduced on the curtilage of a duplex

S.D.Ala.: That ID’ing informant “may reveal” information helpful to the defense isn’t good enough

The potential that the informant “may reveal” information helpful to the defense isn’t good enough to get the informant’s identification. United States v. Reed, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25448 (S.D. Ala. Feb. 16, 2018). The entry was based on observation … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: That ID’ing informant “may reveal” information helpful to the defense isn’t good enough

CA7: Controlled buy corroborated CI

“Although the factors [on CI reliability] go both ways, on balance they support the CI’s reliability. Most significantly, the deputies corroborated the CI’s story with their own investigation by conducting surveillance and executing a controlled buy.” United States v. Haynes, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA7: Controlled buy corroborated CI

GA: Hot pursuit of a traffic stop over jurisdictional lines not unlawful

Officer’s hot pursuit of a traffic offender into a different state jurisdiction didn’t void the stop. In addition, it was reasonable for the officer to time the stop for more level ground. State v. Charles, 2018 Ga. App. LEXIS 51 … Continue reading →

Posted in Hot pursuit, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on GA: Hot pursuit of a traffic stop over jurisdictional lines not unlawful