Category Archives: Informant hearsay

E.D.Mich.: Officers’ versions of arrest and search show two valid versions of why it was valid

The two officers involved in defendant’s stop and search of his person and car had somewhat different versions of what happened. Under either, the search of his person and car were both reasonable. Defendant had no DL which was an … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officers’ versions of arrest and search show two valid versions of why it was valid

TN: Even if a viable motion to suppress existed, it was reasonable strategy to work a plea deal considering all the evidence of guilt

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a suppression motion and working a plea deal instead. First, with the mountain of evidence against defendant, it was wise to work out a deal and avoid sentencing after trial for sexual assault … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Even if a viable motion to suppress existed, it was reasonable strategy to work a plea deal considering all the evidence of guilt

CA1: “Face-to-face” contact with CI by another officer was sufficient

“Although we have said that ‘face-to-face contact between the agent and informant’ and an agent’s opportunity to personally question him generally provides indicia of that informant’s reliability, see, e.g., Dixon, 787 F.3d at 59; Greenburg, 410 F.3d at 67, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA1: “Face-to-face” contact with CI by another officer was sufficient

W.D.La.: Where the search was valid under the automobile exception, the officer’s subjective assessment is irrelevant

“Here, the facts known to Broussard at the time of the search—Dyson’s prior arrest for the illegal possession of a firearm and drugs, and the smell of marijuana emanating from the vehicle during the present stop—support a Terry pat-down search … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Where the search was valid under the automobile exception, the officer’s subjective assessment is irrelevant

CA11: Failure to seek review of R&R is waiver

Defendant did not seek review of the R&R by the USDJ, so appellate review was waived. Also, plain error review not sought. United States v. Fisher, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 37847 (11th Cir. Dec. 21, 2021). Citizen complaint from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: Failure to seek review of R&R is waiver

W.D.La.: In a § 1983 suit over a SW, informer privilege prevents disclosure here

In a § 1983 suit over a search warrant, the defendants plead informer privilege to prevent disclosure of the CI that led to the search. Denied. Informant privilege stronger in civil cases than criminal. There was also significant other information … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: In a § 1983 suit over a SW, informer privilege prevents disclosure here

D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

A single controlled buy from defendant’s home is probable cause without additional corroboration. Moreover, the CI had worked for MPD for a decade. United States v. Hill, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238824 (D.D.C. Dec. 14, 2021). The fire department responded … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

Officer “Mathieson testified that it is his habit to ask about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies during traffic stops. In any event, police officers are permitted to stop a vehicle for a traffic violation and look for evidence of a … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

CA9: That CI could be accountable for falsity supports veracity

“Considering the totality of circumstances, the search warrant affidavit established probable cause that evidence or contraband would be found at Conard’s residence. The affidavit supplied sufficient indicia that the first confidential informant (‘CI 1′) was reliable. To begin, CI 1 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA9: That CI could be accountable for falsity supports veracity

OH2: Citizen informant provided RS

Officers received a disorderly conduct call at a fitness center. When officers arrived, defendant was pointed out, and the officers detained him. They hadn’t seen anything illegal at that point, but the employee’s call as a citizen informant was enough … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Citizen informant provided RS

TX10: Not challenging search when lack of knowledge was the issue for trial is reasonable strategy

In this post-conviction case, trial defense counsel wasn’t asked and didn’t provide an affidavit why he said “no objection” to admission of allegedly illegally seized evidence at trial. Without knowing why, it can’t be ineffective (it was argued it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TX10: Not challenging search when lack of knowledge was the issue for trial is reasonable strategy

S.D.N.Y.: Press motion for disclosure of SW affidavit denied because investigation ongoing

“The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (‘RCFP’), claiming rights of access grounded in the common law, asks the Court to unseal documents relating to a search warrant dated November 5, 2021 (the ‘Search Warrant’), which was executed at … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Press motion for disclosure of SW affidavit denied because investigation ongoing

LA5: Two CIs provided RS for def’s vehicle stop without need for traffic offense

The trial court’s denial of suppress is affirmed. There were two CIs. One provided details about defendant’s drug operation and the places and vehicles involved. The other provided predictive information that panned out. By the time defendant’s vehicle was stopped, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on LA5: Two CIs provided RS for def’s vehicle stop without need for traffic offense

CA6: Failure to object to co-occupant’s apparent consent supported consent

An occupant of defendant’s house with apparent authority consented to an entry. When the officers expressed an interest in defendant’s cell phone, he didn’t voice any concerns. “He maintains that the male occupant’s invitation to the officers to enter Mason’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Failure to object to co-occupant’s apparent consent supported consent

OH4: Failure to corroborate CI was a complete failure of PC, so no GFE either

The affidavit for search warrant here failed to show probable cause at all. It relied on informant hearsay from an identified informant. The trial court erroneously concluded that an identified informant didn’t have to be corroborated. In addition, probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH4: Failure to corroborate CI was a complete failure of PC, so no GFE either

NY4: Failure to ID source of information in affidavit for SW failed showing PC

“Here, the majority of the information provided in support of the warrant application was in an affidavit prepared by a detective, and that affidavit ‘does not “permit a reasonable inference that it was based upon [the detective]’s personal knowledge”’ .… … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: Failure to ID source of information in affidavit for SW failed showing PC

W.D.Tex.: Stone bar applies whether 4A challenge made or not; could it have been?

“The Stone bar applies to ‘to all claims arising under the Fourth Amendment,’ including challenges to the seizure of evidence, Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 596 (5th Cir. 2005) and even to claims ‘where the petitioner did not avail … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Stone bar applies whether 4A challenge made or not; could it have been?

WI: Resident called 911 because of blood in garage; search that found body was reasonable under emergency aid exception

Another resident of the home called 911 because of a large amount of blood in the garage. They arrived and looked for the source, finding a body. Defendant was ultimately arrested. Although Caniglia v. Strom was decided after the briefs … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WI: Resident called 911 because of blood in garage; search that found body was reasonable under emergency aid exception

ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated

Reasonable suspicion was required when the officer retained defendant’s driver’s license by taking it, leaving her presence, and giving it to another officer to run a license check. Defendant was thus detained because a reasonable person in her position would … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Inevitable discovery, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated

CO: These controlled buys were with PC; they could have been “more pristine” but they were adequate

The trial court erred in suppressing the search warrant here because it speculated on things not in the record. The warrant was based on two controlled buys that recounted the CI’s information, the police investigation to corroborate what they could, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CO: These controlled buys were with PC; they could have been “more pristine” but they were adequate