Category Archives: Standing

CA4: Def in rental car preserved standing issue; remanded for application of Byrd

Defendant was in a rental car, and he moved to suppress. He was denied standing under existing case law, but that was abrogated in Byrd. SCOTUS GVR’ed. Remanded for application of Byrd and whatever else. United States v. Houston, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA4: Def in rental car preserved standing issue; remanded for application of Byrd

M.D.La.: Leaving one’s garage door open is not a waiver of REP or standing

Defendant’s garage door was left open, and that reduced his reasonable expectation of privacy in it, but that didn’t mean he had no standing. By leaving open the garage, defendant didn’t invite the police in, and exigent circumstances or a … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Leaving one’s garage door open is not a waiver of REP or standing

CA9: Def didn’t have standing in her parents’ house that she used just to store stuff

Defendant kept stuff at her parents’ house, which was searched with a warrant for her stuff. She lacked standing because it was merely a storage place shared with others. The search warrant was narrowed by the district court with partial … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Def didn’t have standing in her parents’ house that she used just to store stuff

W.D.Mo.: Overnight guest didn’t have standing in attic

Defendant was an overnight guest in a house searched with a warrant. A protective sweep of the attic was done, and the only way into the attic was from the room defendant was staying in. The court first finds that … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Overnight guest didn’t have standing in attic

KS: Guest standing doesn’t require overnight stays to be substantial enough

To have standing to challenge a home search, a guest must show a degree of acceptance into the household or an ongoing and meaningful connection to the host’s residence so that the guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on KS: Guest standing doesn’t require overnight stays to be substantial enough

N.D.Ill.: Collins v. Virginia doesn’t apply to a shared parking area which is not curtilage

Collins v. Virginia does not apply to shared parking areas which are not curtilage. “United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 16409 (2d Cir. June 19, 2018), Jones’s vehicle was parked in a parking lot behind the multi-family building … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Collins v. Virginia doesn’t apply to a shared parking area which is not curtilage

N.D.W.Va.: No standing in car where permission to borrow had been revoked

Defendant had permission to possess and drive a car for a while, but it had been rescinded by the time of the search. Therefore, he lacked standing in the car. United States v. Leclear, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106550 (N.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: No standing in car where permission to borrow had been revoked

CA6: Removing records from a storage unit as police search your house was an obstruction of justice

Federal agents showed up at defendant’s house with a search warrant for records. They asked if he had other records elsewhere. He lied and said no. He left the house, went to a hardware store to buy boltcutters, and he … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Removing records from a storage unit as police search your house was an obstruction of justice

D.S.C.: One innocently driving a stolen vehicle generally doesn’t have standing in it, but he has to show his innocent status

One innocently driving a stolen vehicle generally doesn’t have standing in it. If, however, he innocently buys a stolen vehicle and then he’s stopped in it, it’s his burden to show that he was an innocent purchaser to acquire standing. … Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.C.: One innocently driving a stolen vehicle generally doesn’t have standing in it, but he has to show his innocent status

OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

Guest standing has a functional element. Defendant was a guest in the home of another and their relationship was founded on drugs. While defendant would have standing in the home, he didn’t under the back steps, where, incidentally, he’d been … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

VI: BOLO information shared at beginning of shift satisfies collective knowledge

BOLO information shared with officers at the beginning of their shift qualifies as collective knowledge. Emanuel v. People, 2018 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 10 (June 15, 2018) (relying on United States v. Braden, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115755 (W.D. Tenn. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Standing | Comments Off on VI: BOLO information shared at beginning of shift satisfies collective knowledge

Cal.1: Electronic search condition on juvenile was unreasonable for possession of a knife and rolling papers at school

The electronic search condition on this juvenile for having a knife, rolling papers, and a lighter in school after a school search was unreasonable. The state says its need to prevent him from procuring more marijuana, but the court disagrees. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Electronic search condition on juvenile was unreasonable for possession of a knife and rolling papers at school

CA11: Def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing suppression motion after def admitted facts showing no standing

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not adequately pursuing defendant’s motion to suppress because defendant admitted to counsel facts after the motion was filed that he had no standing at all. He provided that address as his address, but he was … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing suppression motion after def admitted facts showing no standing

S.D.W.Va.: Def’s admissions on body camera duffle bag wasn’t his denies him standing

“The body camera recording clearly shows that Defendant denied any ownership interest in the duffel bag at the time of the stop. As such, the Court finds that Defendant voluntarily abandoned the duffel bag and therefore lost any reasonable expectation … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Def’s admissions on body camera duffle bag wasn’t his denies him standing

LA3: Ping order for def’s cell phone was based on exigency

The police ping request to locate defendant’s phone to locate him was based on clear exigent circumstances. Thus, it did not violate the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2702(c)(4). State v. Malveaux, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 1082 (La. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on LA3: Ping order for def’s cell phone was based on exigency

D.Minn.: Def lacked standing to challenge SW to YouTube for search history and videos viewed in terrorism case

Defendant was indicted for providing material support to a terrorist organization and planned to travel to Afghanistan, and there were nine search warrants. She communicated with Afghanistan on digital devices and by a gmail account. The search warrants for all … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def lacked standing to challenge SW to YouTube for search history and videos viewed in terrorism case

E.D.Mich.: Def was essentially and admittedly an “innocent bystander” at the place searched and had no standing

This defendant had no standing in the condo that was searched under a search warrant. He produced nothing to show that he had any connection to the property or was a guest with a connection to the premises, even an … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def was essentially and admittedly an “innocent bystander” at the place searched and had no standing

SCOTUS: The driver of a rental car not on the contract may have a REP in the car

The driver of a rental car not listed on the contract may have a reasonable exception of privacy in the car Byrd v. United States, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2803 (May 14, 2018). Syllabus:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on SCOTUS: The driver of a rental car not on the contract may have a REP in the car

CA5: When govt addresses GFE, defendant must respond or waive it

In the Fifth Circuit it’s good faith first, probable cause second. The government addressed good faith in its brief, but defendant didn’t in his. Good faith prevails. United States v. Carroll, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 12280 (5th Cir. May 10, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: When govt addresses GFE, defendant must respond or waive it

MS: A passenger in car 20 min before stop had no standing

Defendant was in the car that was stopped for 20 minutes and admittedly had no possessory interest in the car. Therefore, he had no standing. Nowell v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 210 (May 1, 2018). “Williams argues the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on MS: A passenger in car 20 min before stop had no standing