Defendant had permission to possess and drive a car for a while, but it had been rescinded by the time of the search. Therefore, he lacked standing in the car. United States v. Leclear, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106550 (N.D. W.Va. June 26, 2018).
The state showed probable cause from the CI. People v. Magny, 2018 NY Slip Op 04755, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4663 (2d Dept. June 28, 2018).*
The exclusionary rule does not apply in federal revocation of supervised release proceedings, and numerous courts have so held. It doesn’t matter that the search was conducted by a law enforcement officer and not a PO. United States v. Garcia, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106387 (N.D. Ind. June 26, 2018).