Category Archives: Warrant execution

OH3: Invalid admin SW was saved by GFE

An administrative search warrant issued under the state criminal procedure law was invalid because of limits on who could request and serve a warrant (i.e., law enforcement officers and prosecutors). However, the good faith exception applies to administrative warrants, too. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: Invalid admin SW was saved by GFE

N.D.Cal.: “A small constitutional violation is no less a constitutional violation” here a cell phone search that is suppressed

The government attempted to access defendant’s cell phone in the jurisdiction but couldn’t. It sent it to Quantico for a “brute force” password attempt that could involve 1,000,000 combinations with waiting periods defined by the software they installed. Some brute … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: “A small constitutional violation is no less a constitutional violation” here a cell phone search that is suppressed

CAAF: The methodology of a search doesn’t have to be the best to still be reasonable

A flashing incident on a Marine base in December 2018 led to a search authorization of defendant’s cell phone. The images on the phone were first sorted by size instead of date, and that led to accidentally discovering an apparent … Continue reading

Posted in Overseizure, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CAAF: The methodology of a search doesn’t have to be the best to still be reasonable

CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

“[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.” Osmon v. United States, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9177 (4th Cir. Apr. 18, 2023). Defendant’s Franks motion fails because there’s no offer of proof … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

E.D.Pa.: Homeowner can be handcuffed during home search without his being arrested

Having the homeowner in handcuffs during a search of his house and then releasing him when done is reasonable under Michigan v. Summers. Armstrong v. Gretsky, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63028 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2023). Defendant parolee tried to … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Homeowner can be handcuffed during home search without his being arrested

D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am

Even if the search warrant was executed here before 6 a.m., defendant doesn’t show any prejudice by that. A cell phone is not exigency in itself, but here there was at least some risk of destruction of evidence because defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Nighttime search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am

OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

Defendant was stopped and got out of his car, and in the door was a sawed off shotgun. Questions about the gun next to him were legitimate under Quarles. State v. Anderson, 2023-Ohio-945, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 922 (7th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

TX: Totality of circumstances applies to exigency on warrantless seizure of cell phone

“Rather than announcing a categorical rule that police may never seize personal property simply because a criminal suspect knows he is a suspect, the court of appeals should have analyzed under the totality of the circumstances whether law enforcement’s seizure … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX: Totality of circumstances applies to exigency on warrantless seizure of cell phone

KARE 11: Bungled raid led to innocent pregnant woman’s shackling

KARE 11 Investigates: Bungled raid led to innocent pregnant woman’s shackling (“Taxpayers are on the hook for $500,000 after a detective’s misconduct led to a woman’s arrest and Hennepin County jailers illegally shackling her while in labor.”)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on KARE 11: Bungled raid led to innocent pregnant woman’s shackling

W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

An unreasonable 108-day delay in retrieving defendant’s cell phone from local police after the DEA adopted the case required suppression of the search of the phone. United States v. Adams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23973 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2023). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

E.D.Va.: No 4A right to notice before a search occurs; state search law inapplicable in federal court

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim is that he was given no notice that his phones had been searched, citing Virginia law, which is irrelevant in a federal prosecution, even though state officials did all the searching. There’s no constitutional right to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: No 4A right to notice before a search occurs; state search law inapplicable in federal court

Galveston Co. Daily News: Galveston SWAT team wrecks wrong house in search for wrong suspect

The Galveston Co. Daily News: Galveston SWAT team wrecks wrong house in search for wrong suspect by Trace Harris:

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Galveston Co. Daily News: Galveston SWAT team wrecks wrong house in search for wrong suspect

CA3: Going from home to a drug deal is nexus to the home

“Contrary to Torres’ arguments, when an individual is suspected of dealing narcotics, probable cause to search his home does not demand a showing that he deals those narcotics at his home. The common-sense likelihood that drug dealers keep evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA3: Going from home to a drug deal is nexus to the home

KY: Defs showed enough to get a post-conviction hearing officers planted drugs they pled guilty to

Defendants moved to vacate guilty pleas for drug possession after the officers involved were federally indicted for planting drugs on suspects. The trial court denied without a hearing because of the guilty pleas. The CoA reversed and ordered a hearing. … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on KY: Defs showed enough to get a post-conviction hearing officers planted drugs they pled guilty to

WaPo: Police misused Find My app before raiding 77-year-old’s home, ACLU says

WaPo: Police misused Find My app before raiding 77-year-old’s home, ACLU says by María Luisa Paúl:

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Police misused Find My app before raiding 77-year-old’s home, ACLU says

CA4: Video showed district court’s findings of reasonableness clearly erroneous

The video of this stop contradicted the district court’s findings, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. “Here, however, the video evidence does not support some of Officer Helms’s statements and impressions. As we explain, the district court … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Video showed district court’s findings of reasonableness clearly erroneous

CA2: Not unreasonable here to use flashbang device in execution of SW

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging the use of a flashbang device in execution of the search warrant at defendant’s home. The Fourth Amendment does not usually require limits on how the warrant should be executed. Here, it … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: Not unreasonable here to use flashbang device in execution of SW

E.D.N.Y.: Battering down door at dawn in CP SW wasn’t unreasonable, even if uncalled for

SWAT team entry into defendant’s Queens home at dawn for child pornography on a computer was not unreasonable. The police knew that only defendant, his wife, and their children (the children were “Potential Hazards” according to their operational plan) were … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Battering down door at dawn in CP SW wasn’t unreasonable, even if uncalled for

E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

Defendant argued that the execution of this search warrant resulted in disclosure of attorney-client privileged information because of alleged misuse of a taint team. But, he provides no context or anything to go on. Taint teams are recognized in such … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Taint team, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage

Plaintiff’s claim against defendant insurance company for failing to pay an insurance claim for damage during a SWAT team raid on his house goes forward. The policy’s exclusionary clauses are overbroad under California law. Heard v. QBE Ins. Corp., 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage