Category Archives: Warrant execution

CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

The officer had reasonable suspicion that the owner of the vehicle had a suspended DL, but that dissipated when he saw the driver wasn’t the same gender as the owner. But, reasonable suspicion was developing the driver was under the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

In this 2254, petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn’t object that the search warrant was not personally served on him wasn’t a constitutional requirement. Also barred by Stone. Witkowski v. Bennett, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126262 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting a warrant to search was reasonable. People v. Mills, 2025 CO 47, 2025 Colo. LEXIS 572 (June 30, 2025). Defendant’s cell phone was linked to his prostitution/human trafficking case, so there … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep

Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep by C.J. Ciaramella (“The Trump administration deployed National Guard soldiers to assist the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and other federal law enforcement agencies … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep

W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

“Maybe thirteen officers were not needed. Maybe the officers did not need to carry and display rifles. Maybe fewer vehicles could have been used to block Defendant’s vehicle. Maybe officers did not have to place Defendant in handcuffs because their … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

Reason: Federal Courts Shrug at Potentially Lethal Wrong-Door Raids

Reason: Federal Courts Shrug at Potentially Lethal Wrong-Door Raids by Jacob Sullen (“Cops should not be free to forgo the modicum of care required to make sure they’re in the right place.”)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Federal Courts Shrug at Potentially Lethal Wrong-Door Raids

SCOTUS: FTCA applies to raid of the wrong house, remanded to CA11

After federal law enforcement officers raided the wrong house, which should have been evident at the time, the occupants stay in court on their FTCA claim and get to litigate the negligence claim. Martin v. United States, 2025 U.S. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS, Warrant execution | Comments Off on SCOTUS: FTCA applies to raid of the wrong house, remanded to CA11

D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

Defendant’s backpack was searched in 2017, but he wasn’t indicted until 2020, and his case lingered. The officer’s testimony about the search is hazy and inconclusive enough that the court finds cause to dismiss for a speedy trial violation. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

Police had an otherwise valid warrant to install a tracking device on defendant’s vehicle but in a public place. Instead, they entered the curtilage to install it there. This warrant execution violated the Fourth Amendment and state constitution. The tracking … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

CA6: Two officers with separate PC can use one warrant

When two officers have separate probable cause to search, they don’t need separate search warrants, as long as the description covers their purpose. At least qualified immunity applies here. Fitzpatrick v. Hanney, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13214 (6th Cir. May … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Two officers with separate PC can use one warrant

M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

Defendant was made to leave the premises while a search occurred inside, and that was not a seizure of his person. United States v. Arcadipane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82688 (M.D. Fla. May 1, 2025). Defendant, a sex offender on … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

While the question is close here, the protective sweep of defendant’s house during a search warrant was reasonable on the totality. Essentially, the search warrant doesn’t define the scope of a justified protective sweep. “[T]he Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Protective sweep, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

Defendant was a suspect in a driveby shooting. Because defendant’s social media showed firearms, it was a fair inference that evidence of the offense or the social media posts would be on his phone. Therefore, there was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

Reason: The FBI Wrongly Raided a Georgia Family’s Home. Now Their Case Is Going to the Supreme Court.

Reason: The FBI Wrongly Raided a Georgia Family’s Home. Now Their Case Is Going to the Supreme Court. by Billy Binion (“A federal court ruled Trina Martin could not sue the government after agents burst into her home and held … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Tort Claims Act, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: The FBI Wrongly Raided a Georgia Family’s Home. Now Their Case Is Going to the Supreme Court.

CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

71-day delay in getting search warrant to access defendant’s cell phone was reasonable where the delay was attributed to waiting for a software update for their device because the iPhone was a newer model. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

Summary judgment and qualified immunity were properly denied where officers searching for someone other than the plaintiff in plaintiff’s house [apparently] gratuitously nearly destroyed it, breaking all windows, toilets, leaving water running in the house, appliances, furniture, and a car … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

Defendant’s conviction for obstructing a search is affirmed. He was not entitled to a jury instruction that he had to have seen or read the warrant first where it was not disputed that he knew there was a warrant. Commonwealth … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution

Google responded to a series of search warrants for information and finally objected to a warrant to de-anonymize the information it previously provided. It can’t challenge the warrant before execution under Grubbs. Google LLC v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution

D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements

Defense counsel’s acceptance of a warrant was a waiver of the service requirements for a warrant in Rule 41. It was also otherwise valid. United States v. Reynoso, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40555 (D.P.R. Mar. 4, 2025). “The search and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements

KS: In responding to SW, out-of-state social media company’s authentication statement substantially complied with state law

In responding to a search warrant request, the social media company provided Rule 901 authentication for that state “under penalty of perjury,” but under the law of the United States not the State of Kansas. It was under penalty of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Pretext, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on KS: In responding to SW, out-of-state social media company’s authentication statement substantially complied with state law