CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting a warrant to search was reasonable. People v. Mills, 2025 CO 47, 2025 Colo. LEXIS 572 (June 30, 2025).

Defendant’s cell phone was linked to his prostitution/human trafficking case, so there was probable cause for the warrant to search it. Jackson v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4597 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) July 1, 2025).*

Defendant claims false testimony was used to get an indictment, and he requests a Franks hearing. Franks is a Fourth Amendment issue; indictments is a Fifth Amendment issue. Denied. United States v. Twitty, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123997 (S.D. Ga. June 30, 2025).*

The trial court credited the officer’s testimony that the license plate light was out justifying this stop. State v. Davis, 2025-Ohio-2322 (5th Dist. June 27, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.