Author Archives: Hall

TX4: Juvenile consented to search of room but parent objects; it’s the parent’s call

A juvenile was detained on suspicion of burglary, and the officers went back to his house. The juvenile consented, but the parent objected, and that was binding on the officers because of the control a parent has over a child. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX4: Juvenile consented to search of room but parent objects; it’s the parent’s call

MI: Unreasonable mistake of law voids search

Defendant’s arrest was without probable cause for violating a no trespassing ordinance. It was a public place, open for business, defendant briefly entered and did nothing wrong. The search incident to the arrest thus fails too. Mistake of law as … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MI: Unreasonable mistake of law voids search

EFF: Montana Protects Communications Privacy, But Allows Gag Orders

EFF: Montana Protects Communications Privacy, But Allows Gag Orders by Andrew Crocker and Adam Schwartz (which EFF says violate the First Amendment).

Posted in ECPA | Comments Off on EFF: Montana Protects Communications Privacy, But Allows Gag Orders

ABC News: JetBlue testing facial-recognition boarding system in Boston

ABC News: JetBlue testing facial-recognition boarding system in Boston by Jeffrey Cook: JetBlue Airways will soon begin testing technology at Boston’s Logan International Airport that will use facial-recognition in lieu of a boarding pass to clear passengers to board their … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABC News: JetBlue testing facial-recognition boarding system in Boston

WaPo: Opinion: Body cameras are key for police accountability. We can’t let them erode privacy rights

WaPo: Opinion: Body cameras are key for police accountability. We can’t let them erode privacy rights by Chris Dunn and Donna Lieberman: An essential tool poses a core dilemma.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: Opinion: Body cameras are key for police accountability. We can’t let them erode privacy rights

N.D.Ill.: Viewing def’s Facebook page isn’t a 4A violation

Viewing defendant’s public Facebook is [hardly] a Fourth Amendment or Stored Communications Act claim. United States v. Khan, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82493 (N.D. Ill. May 31, 2017):

Posted in ECPA, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Viewing def’s Facebook page isn’t a 4A violation

CA2: Computer SW was sufficiently particular; broad doesn’t mean necessarily unreasonable

In the Silk Road “drug kingpin” conviction, whether the third party doctrine succumbs to technology is going to have to come from SCOTUS since the doctrine came from it. The search warrant for defendant’s computer was sufficiently particular. Broad for … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overseizure, Particularity, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA2: Computer SW was sufficiently particular; broad doesn’t mean necessarily unreasonable

EFF: Why We’re Suing the FBI for Records About Best Buy Geek Squad Informants

EFF: Why We’re Suing the FBI for Records About Best Buy Geek Squad Informants by Stephanie Lacambra and Aaron Mackey:

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on EFF: Why We’re Suing the FBI for Records About Best Buy Geek Squad Informants

AZ: Being directed to get out of the car alone doesn’t extend the stop

“Urrea has not explained how his being directed to exit his vehicle while the deputy conducted a records check illegally prolonged the stop.” Even so, his coming back to the patrol car to talk about it was by consent. [Really?] … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on AZ: Being directed to get out of the car alone doesn’t extend the stop

IN: Anonymous report of man with gun wouldn’t alone support frisk, but def fled

Police received an anonymous tip that a man matching defendant’s description had a gun in a bar. The officer arrived right after the call and saw defendant. Under state case law, that alone wasn’t enough for a frisk without more. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: Anonymous report of man with gun wouldn’t alone support frisk, but def fled

Time: Alexa Takes the Stand: Listening Devices Raise Privacy Issues

Time: Alexa Takes the Stand: Listening Devices Raise Privacy Issues by Haley Sweetland Edwards:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Time: Alexa Takes the Stand: Listening Devices Raise Privacy Issues

IN: Failure to knock-and-announce is really just a reasonableness argument

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising a challenge to the officer’s failure to knock-and-announce before entering defendant’s home on a search warrant for drugs. She had priors, there were controlled buys, and guns often go with drugs. The knock-and-announce … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Failure to knock-and-announce is really just a reasonableness argument

IL: “Immediately apparent” for plain view really means “probable cause”

Product bar codes found in plain view in defendant’s car were seized with probable cause. Officers experienced in investigating retail theft from a Best Buy were investigating thefts that involved altered bar codes. “Immediately apparent” for plain view really means … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IL: “Immediately apparent” for plain view really means “probable cause”

M.D.Fla.: Unauthorized driver of rented car with suspended DL had no REP in car even if driving with permission of renter

Defendant had a subjective reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental vehicle he was driving with permission of the renter and potentially the implicit permission of the rental company because he was seen in it by them. [Whether they knew … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Unauthorized driver of rented car with suspended DL had no REP in car even if driving with permission of renter

NY1: A request to produce ID isn’t always a seizure

The request to defendant to produce his ID when the police were investigating a potential trespass doesn’t constitute a seizure per se. Here, the defendant volunteered to take the officer to where he was going. That was all consent. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on NY1: A request to produce ID isn’t always a seizure

W.D.Mo.: Driveway not curtilage for dog sniff of car

Relying on United States v. Beene, 818 F.3d 157 (5th Cir. 2016) (posted here), defendant’s car parked on the driveway in front of his home was subject to a dog sniff as if it was on the street. Because of … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Inventory | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Driveway not curtilage for dog sniff of car

SCOTUS: Co. of LA v. Mendez: No constitutional basis for the Ninth Circuit’s “provocation” rule that an officer’s conduct that provokes a violent response is a separate Fourth Amendment claim

There is no constitutional basis for the Ninth Circuit’s “provocation” rule that an officer’s conduct that provokes a violent response is a separate Fourth Amendment claim. County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3396 (U.S. May 30, 2017). … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Co. of LA v. Mendez: No constitutional basis for the Ninth Circuit’s “provocation” rule that an officer’s conduct that provokes a violent response is a separate Fourth Amendment claim

N.D.Cal.: It’s not for LEO to second guess a probation search condition’s validity or application

If the probation search condition applies on its face, and even if the search is for general law enforcement purposes, it’s not for the searching officer to inquire into the details of whether there might be some argument behind the … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: It’s not for LEO to second guess a probation search condition’s validity or application

TN: Blood draw without consent was valid at the time it happened; therefore valid

Obtaining defendant’s blood draw without consent was a practice authorized by binding appellate precedent at the time it occurred. Therefore, the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress was appropriate because the officer was acting under a good faith belief that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN: Blood draw without consent was valid at the time it happened; therefore valid

N.D.W.Va.: Officers arrived at an injured person call, and the assailant wasn’t around; protective sweep permissible

“Here, the officers arrived to a chaotic scene. The Defendant was severely injured after being hit by a bottle. There were at least two other individuals present. The Police were told the assailant, who had demonstrated his violent nature, was … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Officers arrived at an injured person call, and the assailant wasn’t around; protective sweep permissible