Author Archives: Hall

Cal.: Cal.’s initiated DNA act constitutionally requires DNA sampling from those charged with serious felonies

California’s initiated DNA collection act requiring DNA sampling of those charged with serious felonies applies to defendant’s arson arrest. He refused to provide a sample on booking and was convicted of a misdemeanor offense. The California statute is not exactly … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Cal.: Cal.’s initiated DNA act constitutionally requires DNA sampling from those charged with serious felonies

W.D.Mich.: No REP in overheard unethical ex parte communication with a judge

An ex parte communication between lawyers and a judge overheard on an open phone line of a part of a call that hadn’t been completely disconnected has no reasonable expectation of privacy. Ideally, there woud be a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in ECPA, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: No REP in overheard unethical ex parte communication with a judge

Volokh Conspiracy: Why the Supreme Court Reviews So Many Qualified Immunity Cases

Volokh Conspiracy: Why the Supreme Court Reviews So Many Qualified Immunity Cases by Orin Kerr: Here’s a theory, at least.

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: Why the Supreme Court Reviews So Many Qualified Immunity Cases

SCOTUS: Qualified immunity for shooting a woman holding a knife in an apparent threatening manner

In Kisela v. Hughes, 17-467 (U.S. April 2, 2018), decided on the cert petition and response, the Supreme Court held that an officer who shot a woman holding a knife in an apparent threatening manner [although that seems to be … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Qualified immunity for shooting a woman holding a knife in an apparent threatening manner

The Economist: There will be little privacy in the workplace of the future

The Economist: There will be little privacy in the workplace of the future: AI will make workplaces more efficient, safer-and much creepier.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Economist: There will be little privacy in the workplace of the future

Wired: The Hairy Problem With Drug Testing

Wired: The Hairy Problem With Drug Testing by Ellen Airhart: Boston police officers whose hair tests positive for drugs usually have two options: admit their substance abuse problems and agree to a stint in rehabilitation, or relinquish their position. But … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Wired: The Hairy Problem With Drug Testing

NYTimes: Hey, Alexa, What Can You Hear? And What Will You Do With It?

NYTimes: Hey, Alexa, What Can You Hear? And What Will You Do With It? by Sapna Maheswari: Amazon and Google have filed patent applications, many still under consideration, that outline how digital assistants can monitor more of what users say … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Hey, Alexa, What Can You Hear? And What Will You Do With It?

E.D.Va.: CP SW for images “created, modified or stored in any form,” including electronically included a cell phone

A child pornography search warrant for images “created, modified or stored in any form,” including electronically included a cell phone. As to defendant’s Franks challenge, his complaint about hearsay completely fails because whatever the police had, they obtained another person’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: CP SW for images “created, modified or stored in any form,” including electronically included a cell phone

E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

Suit over opening of non-legal mail, here medical records, was frivolous. Villafana v. Clarke, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54893 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2018). The first officer at the scene conducted a search without probable cause. A supervising officer appeared … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

CA3: Controlled buy moots Franks challenge to CI

The CI’s story was confirmed by two controlled buys. The Franks challenge to the CI fails as to whether it was corroborated or completely immaterial because of the controlled buys. United States v. Carney, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8116 (3d … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Controlled buy moots Franks challenge to CI

CA5: Holding DL doesn’t make request for consent coercive; record unclear on how long dispatch took to get back

Retention of identification documents when asking for consent does not ipso facto make the request coercive. The record is unclear on how long it took for computer checks to be complete, too. United States v. Perales, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Holding DL doesn’t make request for consent coercive; record unclear on how long dispatch took to get back

E.D.Cal.: Prison inmate states 4A claim for digital rectal search in front of other inmates

Plaintiff prison inmate states a claim for a digital search in front of other inmates. Fuentes v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52132 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018). The prison strip search here had a legitimate penological … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Body searches, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Prison inmate states 4A claim for digital rectal search in front of other inmates

TX5: Pre-Jardines dog sniff was apparently valid at the time and wouldn’t be suppressed

Defendant’s home was subjected to a dog sniff a year before Jardines. Relying on that, the trial court suppressed. Because enough Texas cases held similar searches were valid prior to Jardines, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule would not … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX5: Pre-Jardines dog sniff was apparently valid at the time and wouldn’t be suppressed

IL: SW in murder investigation was general and sought drug evidence without showing PC for it

The search warrant in a murder investigation didn’t incorporate the affidavit in support, and it wasn’t present for the search, so this warrant was too general to support a search. The search warrant was shown to be for a drug … Continue reading →

Posted in General warrant | Comments Off on IL: SW in murder investigation was general and sought drug evidence without showing PC for it

NJ: Vehicle SW doesn’t sanitize the prior illegal stop or shift the burden to defense

A later issued search warrant doesn’t retroactively justify a stop the defense showed to be without a legal basis. The state carried the burden of proof throughout, and it could not shift the burden to the defense by the issuance … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NJ: Vehicle SW doesn’t sanitize the prior illegal stop or shift the burden to defense

D.S.D.: Issuance of a state’s prosecutor’s subpoena for an ulterior motive states a claim

A state AG’s subpoena was issued for a prisoner’s medical records, but not in a criminal investigation. Enough cases, especially in this circuit, hold there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records to overcome qualified immunity. In addition, … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Issuance of a state’s prosecutor’s subpoena for an ulterior motive states a claim

Cal.5: Detaining visiting non-probationer during probation search was unreasonable

Defendant was visiting a friend when the friend’s PO showed up for an unannounced search. Defendant was detained, too. His detention was unreasonable. People v. Gutierrez, 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 282 (5th Dist. Mar. 29, 2018). This defendant challenged the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.5: Detaining visiting non-probationer during probation search was unreasonable

CA4: Jardines didn’t bar officers from following burnt marijuana smell to def’s apartment

Two officers on bike patrol rode through an apartment complex and smelled burning marijuana. They followed their noses and sniffed at defendant’s place and knocked. The district court erred in suppressing because it read too much into Jardines. The officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA4: Jardines didn’t bar officers from following burnt marijuana smell to def’s apartment

OH7: 23 days isn’t stale in a SW for guns

The police were in defendant’s house and observed guns. They didn’t realize that he was a felon in possession until two weeks later. Then they sought a warrant 23 days after seeing the guns. That wasn’t unreasonable considering the fact … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Staleness | Comments Off on OH7: 23 days isn’t stale in a SW for guns

D.Me.: SW didn’t authorize search of visitor’s cars arriving after search started

The search warrant in this case did not authorize a search of a vehicle that arrived at the premises during the search. There was, however, independent probable cause for a search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Me.: SW didn’t authorize search of visitor’s cars arriving after search started