Author Archives: Hall

ACLU Blog: Stop-and-Frisk Settlement in Milwaukee Lawsuit Is a Wakeup Call for Police Nationwide

ACLU Blog: Stop-and-Frisk Settlement in Milwaukee Lawsuit Is a Wakeup Call for Police Nationwide by Nusrat Choudhury: In a banner day for police reform, the city of Milwaukee has entered into a settlement agreement to end practices amounting to a … Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ACLU Blog: Stop-and-Frisk Settlement in Milwaukee Lawsuit Is a Wakeup Call for Police Nationwide

Human Rights Watch Blog: US: Government Has Planted Spy Phones With Suspects

Human Rights Watch Blog: US: Government Has Planted Spy Phones With Suspects:

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Human Rights Watch Blog: US: Government Has Planted Spy Phones With Suspects

OH7: There was plenty of PC for def’s DNA in a murder case to connect him to the body found in his house

Affidavits for search warrant can be based on hearsay, and here the totality of information was probable cause to gather defendant’s DNA in a murder case. There was a known connection between the defendant and the victim, and male DNA … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OH7: There was plenty of PC for def’s DNA in a murder case to connect him to the body found in his house

WY: PC existed for vehicle search before dog was called in; legality of stop abandoned

Defendant’s three sentence motion to suppress said it would follow up with authority. The motion and hearing without that authority narrowed the scope of the claim and abandoned the justification for the stop and any state constitutional claim. What developed … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, State constitution | Comments Off on WY: PC existed for vehicle search before dog was called in; legality of stop abandoned

W.D.Mo.: Overnight guest didn’t have standing in attic

Defendant was an overnight guest in a house searched with a warrant. A protective sweep of the attic was done, and the only way into the attic was from the room defendant was staying in. The court first finds that … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Overnight guest didn’t have standing in attic

CA3: Def’s trespass argument of using key to find door was interesting, but waived

Defendant raises an interesting argument, but it’s raised for the first time on appeal and thus waived: “Wheeler next argues that under the trespass theory of the Fourth Amendment articulated in United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012) and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s trespass argument of using key to find door was interesting, but waived

W.D.Mo.: Cell phone seized during child porn raid was initially seized and searched, and then seven months later searched again; no exclusion

The defendant’s cell phone was seized during a child pornography raid. The phone was attempted to be searched reasonably promptly, and it was confirmed there was child pornography on it. The search was not completed, however, because of problems with … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Cell phone seized during child porn raid was initially seized and searched, and then seven months later searched again; no exclusion

CA11: Newly discovered evidence that officer committed perjury years after obtaining def’s SW wasn’t sufficient for successor habeas

Newly discovered evidence that the police officer involved in obtaining the search warrant for petitioner had committed perjury in some other proceeding years later wasn’t sufficient to show actual innocence for successor habeas. In re Taylor, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA11: Newly discovered evidence that officer committed perjury years after obtaining def’s SW wasn’t sufficient for successor habeas

NMCCA: Despite lack of PC for search authorization, GFE applies because everybody thought there was PC

Defendant service member had sex with another service member, allegedly taking pictures and videos of her. Then he allegedly tried to extort her over the pictures, which she reported. A search authorization was issued for defendant’s on base housing to … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on NMCCA: Despite lack of PC for search authorization, GFE applies because everybody thought there was PC

NY3: Neutral and detached magistrate claim has to be preserved for appeal

Defendant’s claim that the issuing magistrate was not neutral and detached was not preserved for appellate review. And, in any event, it lacks merit because there was plenty of probable cause. People v. Schaefer, 2018 NY Slip Op 05235, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on NY3: Neutral and detached magistrate claim has to be preserved for appeal

TN: Seizure of a cell phone incident to arrest is provided for in Riley; search still requires warrant

Defendant’s cell phone was properly seized incident to his arrest, as contemplated by Riley. It was not searched until a search warrant was obtained. State v. Wade, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 523 (July 13, 2018). The search warrant for … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Search incident, Staleness | Comments Off on TN: Seizure of a cell phone incident to arrest is provided for in Riley; search still requires warrant

E.D.N.C.: Passenger’s possession of counterfeit drugs didn’t justify search of def’s car

Defendant’s passenger having alleged counterfeit drugs on his person didn’t provide probable cause for a search of defendant’s car under the automobile exception. United States v. Daughtridge, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115326 (E.D. N.C. July 11, 2018). You can’t relitigate … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Passenger’s possession of counterfeit drugs didn’t justify search of def’s car

N.D.Ind.: Protective sweep here was based on officers’ experience and not on any specific facts and was still reasonable

The officers here had no specific information there was anybody else in defendant’s house when they did a protective sweep. Nevertheless, the sweep is reasonable. Officers are also entitled to draw on their experience in determining whether a protective sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Protective sweep here was based on officers’ experience and not on any specific facts and was still reasonable

D.Md.: Officer gets QI for arresting person with same name but it turned out warrant was for far younger woman of different race

Plaintiff was legally blind but owned her car. She was a passenger in the back seat. After the vehicle was stopped, the officer found a warrant for a person with the same name as her. She protested she wasn’t the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Md.: Officer gets QI for arresting person with same name but it turned out warrant was for far younger woman of different race

S.D.Tex.: Ct credits def’s version; on govt’s: “Hypothetical could-haves or would-haves simply will not do.” Govt conceded gamma ray scan was search.

Defendant was stopped at the I-35 immigration check point near Laredo. The video is soundless and 14 seconds long. The officer’s version doesn’t seem possible within the time of the video, but the defendant’s does. The officer had the defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Ct credits def’s version; on govt’s: “Hypothetical could-haves or would-haves simply will not do.” Govt conceded gamma ray scan was search.

Lexology: Can the government unlock your iPhone by forcing you to provide your fingerprints?

Lexology: Can the government unlock your iPhone by forcing you to provide your fingerprints? by Duane Morris LLP.

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Lexology: Can the government unlock your iPhone by forcing you to provide your fingerprints?

D.D.C.: Random drug testing of day care employees unreasonable

Random suspicionless government mandated drug testing of day care employees unreasonable because there is no compelling governmental interest. Ass’n of Indep. Sch. of Greater Wash. v. District of Columbia, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70146 (D.D.C. April 20, 2018), reconsideration denied, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Random drug testing of day care employees unreasonable

The Verge: California malls have been feeding license plate data to a national network linked with ICE

The Verge: California malls have been feeding license plate data to a national network linked with ICE by Russell Brandom: A number of California malls appear to be feeding data back to a national license-plate reader network linked to Immigration … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Verge: California malls have been feeding license plate data to a national network linked with ICE

E.D.Va.: Manafort storage building search sustained: Employee with free access had apparent authority to consent to entry

The FBI reasonably relied on a person with apparent authority to consent to an entry into a storage locker to look around. The consenter had free access to the storage room as an employee, and the employer-employee relationship can permit … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Independent source | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Manafort storage building search sustained: Employee with free access had apparent authority to consent to entry

CA3: FTCA doesn’t apply to TSA screeners

TSA screeners are not “investigative or law enforcement officers” for purposes of the Federal Tort Claims Act. Therefore, they are covered by the discretionary function exemption. Pellegrino v. United States Transp. Sec. Admin., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 18821 (3d Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Airport searches | Comments Off on CA3: FTCA doesn’t apply to TSA screeners