Author Archives: Hall

2255: Can’t keep reraising 4A claim you’ve already lost on

2255 petitioner already lost on his CSLI issue in the direct proceedings, and he doesn’t get to relitigate it now. Figueroa v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206123 (S.D. N.Y. Nov. 26, 2019).* Petitioner raised his Fourth Amendment issues … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on 2255: Can’t keep reraising 4A claim you’ve already lost on

FL4: Use of cell site simulator under CSLI order 4A violation; no GFE because of lack of contrary authority

In 2012, well before Carpenter, the police used a cell site simulator under CSLI order to track defendant. There was no binding authority at the time for the state to rely on. By the time this case reaches appeal, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on FL4: Use of cell site simulator under CSLI order 4A violation; no GFE because of lack of contrary authority

E.D.Wis.: Cert grant alone in Carpenter didn’t nullify GFE as to CSLI

The fact that SCOTUS had granted cert in Carpenter when the CSLI was obtained under a § 2703 order and not a search warrant doesn’t make government reliance on existing precedent unreasonable or show a lack good faith. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Cert grant alone in Carpenter didn’t nullify GFE as to CSLI

CA1: Ptf shows apparent Franks violation to survive SJ in § 1983 case

Defendants’ grant of summary judgment in a § 1983 case is reversed for a Franks violation in a theft case where plaintiff had a power of attorney over the property and the officer knew it and failed to disclose it … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: Ptf shows apparent Franks violation to survive SJ in § 1983 case

CA8: Dist.Ct. erred in finding no RS for extending stop; there was, and it ripened to PC

The district court erred in finding there was no reasonable suspicion for extending the stop. “We have found a combination of nervous behavior and suspicious travel plans creates a reasonable suspicion justifying a traffic stop’s extension. … In the protective … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Dist.Ct. erred in finding no RS for extending stop; there was, and it ripened to PC

CT: Def counsel’s choice to distance def from bedroom with drug was reasonable

Defendant argued defense counsel was ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress the search of a bedroom he stayed in in the house of another. The testimony was conflicting. Defendant said that he had exclusive use of the bedroom, … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CT: Def counsel’s choice to distance def from bedroom with drug was reasonable

CA3: Inevitable discovery applies because govt was drafting SW and there was “overwhelming” PC

Inevitable discovery applies: “The District Court based its decision to admit evidence from Restitullo’s apartment on three factors. First, police drafted the warrant application before Restitullo’s interrogation began. Second, ‘overwhelming’ probable cause existed to search Restitullo’s bedroom based on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA3: Inevitable discovery applies because govt was drafting SW and there was “overwhelming” PC

CA1: Mere fact friend had possession of def’s bags didn’t show actual or apparent authority to consent

Defendant stored bags with a friend, and he ended up in jail. There was no actual or apparent authority shown for her to consent to search of the bags. The government carries the burden on both, and it fails. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA1: Mere fact friend had possession of def’s bags didn’t show actual or apparent authority to consent

IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

It’s defendant’s burden in challenging a search warrant to raise both the defects in the warrant (such as a lack of probable cause) and inapplicability of the good faith exception. Raising the good faith exception in his reply brief is … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

W.D.N.C.: Guilty plea waived 4A IAC claim

“The knowing and voluntary guilty plea waived all alleged ineffective assistance of counsel which preceded it, including counsel’s alleged deficiencies with regards to Fourth Amendment issues.” Allen v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205762 (W.D. N.C. Nov. 26, 2019). … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Guilty plea waived 4A IAC claim

PA: Refusing to submit to BAC blood draw under SW supports obstruction of justice conviction

Refusal to submit to a blood draw search warrant for BAC supports a conviction for obstruction of justice. Commonwealth v. Palchanes, 2019 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1186 (Nov. 27, 2019). The CI’s basis of knowledge and reliability was adequately shown, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: Refusing to submit to BAC blood draw under SW supports obstruction of justice conviction

TN: Def can’t show prejudice for IAC claim for failing to call a witness he can’t identify or summarize testimony of

Defendant filed a post-conviction petition alleging that a necessary witness hadn’t been called for the suppression hearing. He could not, however, provide any decent information about name, where she could be found, what she would say, or that it would … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Def can’t show prejudice for IAC claim for failing to call a witness he can’t identify or summarize testimony of

OH8: State’s losing exhibits from suppression hearing requires new trial

Appellant appeals the denial of his suppression motion, but a bunch of the exhibits are missing. The state relies on precedent that it’s the appellant’s obligation to bring up a record. The state, however, somehow got Exhibits 1-23 back and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH8: State’s losing exhibits from suppression hearing requires new trial

CO holds four months of pole camera surveillance of def’s fenced-in backyard was unreasonable and violated 4A

Four months of warrantless and continuous pole camera surveillance of defendant’s fenced-in back yard was unreasonable and violated his reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment. People v. Tafoya, 2019 COA 176, 2019 Colo. App. LEXIS 1799 (Nov. 27, … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on CO holds four months of pole camera surveillance of def’s fenced-in backyard was unreasonable and violated 4A

FL follows Mitchell on blood draws from the unconscious

The Florida Supreme Court granted a certified question of public importance on whether a search warrant was required to draw blood from an unconscious motorist in the hospital. In the meantime, SCOTUS decided Mitchell v. Wisconsin. This court applies Mitchell … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL follows Mitchell on blood draws from the unconscious

KS: Officer’s reinitating contact during stop and leaning into window with hands on door meant to driver he wasn’t free to leave

Officer’s reinitiating contact with driver, leaning on window and asking about asking more questions on the totality signaled to defendant he wasn’t free to leave. State v. Gonzalez, 2019 Kan. App. LEXIS 85 (Nov. 27, 2019):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on KS: Officer’s reinitating contact during stop and leaning into window with hands on door meant to driver he wasn’t free to leave

WaPo: Maryland police drones aid in searches, crash investigations, but raise privacy concerns

WaPo: Maryland police drones aid in searches, crash investigations, but raise privacy concerns by Alison Knezevich:

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on WaPo: Maryland police drones aid in searches, crash investigations, but raise privacy concerns

IL: Once def was acquitted, seized computer data should have been returned, not searched again without a warrant

Defendant was a Peoria police officer being accused of sexual assault, and the Illinois State Police obtained a search warrant for his computer and other devices. The hard drives were copied with EnCase software. Defendant was tried on the sexual … Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IL: Once def was acquitted, seized computer data should have been returned, not searched again without a warrant

E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

A brief meeting for what could only be described by the officer, in his experience, was likely a hand-to-hand sale in a high crime area reasonable suspicion for a stop. “Other suggested explanations by defendant, such as that defendant may … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

Daily Beast: Trump Is First to Use PATRIOT Act to Detain a Man Forever

Daily Beast: Trump Is First to Use PATRIOT Act to Detain a Man Forever by Spencer Ackerman (“Never in 18 years has the government used Section 412 of the PATRIOT Act, which permits indefinite detention of resident aliens on national-security … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Daily Beast: Trump Is First to Use PATRIOT Act to Detain a Man Forever